On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Mary Trigiani <marytrigi
...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am sharing a truncated version of some email correspondence today. I
> think we have to put a simple activity/action item in place after we
> have our in-person meetings -- where existing members follow up with
> new attendees.
> One thing we need to consider is whether engineers should do the
> followup with engineers, because in this example, in Rajesh's response
> to me below, he explains his specialty, and I think a fellow engineer
> would be more knowledgeable as to how Rajesh could participate in
> dp.org.
> Meanwhile, if any of you guys would like to add to the followup with
> Rajesh, just let me know and I'll share his contact details. Thanks!
> Mary
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
> From: Mary Trigiani
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:52 AM
> Hi again. When you have time, check out this page and see if there's
> anything that interests you. Right now, the project's focus is
> producing technical best practices. Mary
> http://dataportability.onconfluence.com/display/dpmain/Home
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
> Hi Mary,
> I haven't received any communication from DP after the meeting. In any
> case, I am more of a middle layer (between coders and end users) so
> not sure how much I can contribute.
> Thanks
> Rajesh
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Mary Trigiani wrote:
> Hi Rajesh -- thanks. Have been meaning to write and ask if you
> decided to join the dataportability project. Mary