Brady lets first see if people think it's a good idea etc - you already have tonnes on your plate with the Legal Entity task force :)
If this is a 'go' then we should get a taskforce leader and event organizer to run it.
Chris
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Brady Brim-DeForest <brad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds excellent.
> Lets find a date and a location.
> I'll look into the details of your proposal this afternoon.
> -Brady
-- Chris Saad
FaradayMedia - For Audiences of One Particls - Are You Paying Attention? Engagd - The Open Attention Platform Media 2.0 Workgroup - Social, Democratic, Distributed APML - Your Attention Profile DataPortability - Connect, Control, Share, Remix
Should get some socially-aware enterprises to be sponsors, for the summit, to a good cause, ie., engage them to do a simple commitment first (ie., give money, easiest for them?!).. then let their messengers work the cause within their respective organizations.. just an idea.. of cos we can show their big logos on our homepage for their being sponsors etc.
Re the wiki, and in fact our tech best practices, we've been focusing almost solely on social networks data portability.. (that's good and that's hot).. [re tech best practice doc: the first step is "Login".. but what about other social media services that requires no login, eg., technorati, blogsfeed, newsfeed, etc.. still want data portability for these..] Then, document format's data portability too.. ie., ooxml and odf, etc.. just a brief by-the-way mention.. unless we can expand the agenda to include that part (or, unless that's outside dp's scope.. me not sure).. regards, /ac.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Saad" <chris.s...@gmail.com> To: "DataPortability.Action.Steering" <dataportabilityactionsteering@googlegroups.com> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 3:59 AM Subject: [DP.AG.Steering] Proposing a DataPortability summit
Sounds like a good idea, and if done right could get a lot
accomplished.
My suggestion would be to target 2 (or possibly 2.5) days. It's
possible that we could multi-track some of the discussions (or go
later into the night).
=jtrentadams
On May 16, 3:59 pm, Chris Saad <chris.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
Multi-track sounds like a good idea - I just worry that wont be able to pour discoveries from one session into the other. I was hoping to have a sort of evolving set of conversations that lead naturally from one to the other so that if you attended all of them a story would be told.
Maybe that is too ambitious and will take too many days?
Chris
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:32 PM, J. Trent Adams <jtrentad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea, and if done right could get a lot > accomplished.
> My suggestion would be to target 2 (or possibly 2.5) days. It's > possible that we could multi-track some of the discussions (or go > later into the night).
FaradayMedia - For Audiences of One Particls - Are You Paying Attention? Engagd - The Open Attention Platform Media 2.0 Workgroup - Social, Democratic, Distributed APML - Your Attention Profile DataPortability - Connect, Control, Share, Remix
Not sure where I mentioned it already but I think having some way to participate from the outside would be great. Like if there would be some video stream in Quicktime format I could set something up in Second Life. If it's a discussion it would then also be cool to project the SL location on the wall to "connect" both worlds a bit. The same can be done of course with ustream.tv etc.
Of course multitrack makes this more complicated but some way to participate from the outside would be nice.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Chris Saad <chris.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Multi-track sounds like a good idea - I just worry that wont be able to pour > discoveries from one session into the other. I was hoping to have a sort of > evolving set of conversations that lead naturally from one to the other so > that if you attended all of them a story would be told.
> Maybe that is too ambitious and will take too many days?
> Chris
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:32 PM, J. Trent Adams <jtrentad...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>> Chris -
>> Sounds like a good idea, and if done right could get a lot >> accomplished.
>> My suggestion would be to target 2 (or possibly 2.5) days. It's >> possible that we could multi-track some of the discussions (or go >> later into the night).
>> =jtrentadams
>> On May 16, 3:59 pm, Chris Saad <chris.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I'd like to propose this idea - would be interested in feedback and
> FaradayMedia - For Audiences of One > Particls - Are You Paying Attention? > Engagd - The Open Attention Platform > Media 2.0 Workgroup - Social, Democratic, Distributed > APML - Your Attention Profile > DataPortability - Connect, Control, Share, Remix
Do you imagine this to be a free/nearly-free event, open to the dataportability public (as barcamps and academic gatherings often are)? Or more of a rationed access event, either through restricted invitation (like foocamp) or by ticket price (like TED)? Where you fall on this continuum influences overall budget, revenue mix, marketing mix, % of people with planned comps (as much as 50-60% comped at an O'Reilly-style event) and event design.
- Phil
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Chris Saad <chris.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to propose this idea - would be interested in feedback and > ideas.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Phil Wolff <pwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you imagine this to be a free/nearly-free event, open to the > dataportability public (as barcamps and academic gatherings often are)? Or > more of a rationed access event, either through restricted invitation (like > foocamp) or by ticket price (like TED)? Where you fall on this continuum > influences overall budget, revenue mix, marketing mix, % of people with > planned comps (as much as 50-60% comped at an O'Reilly-style event) and > event design.
> - Phil
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Chris Saad <chris.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to propose this idea - would be interested in feedback and >> ideas.
FaradayMedia - For Audiences of One Particls - Are You Paying Attention? Engagd - The Open Attention Platform Media 2.0 Workgroup - Social, Democratic, Distributed APML - Your Attention Profile DataPortability - Connect, Control, Share, Remix
