Message from discussion
Proposal: Using pandas as backend
Received: by 10.216.235.32 with SMTP id t32mr103728weq.7.1343379528990;
Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: databrewery@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.216.228.99 with SMTP id e77ls3142312weq.9.gmail; Fri, 27 Jul
2012 01:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.98.234 with SMTP id el10mr310859wib.3.1343379528736;
Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.98.234 with SMTP id el10mr310858wib.3.1343379528726;
Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <stefan.urba...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i17si485718wiw.0.2012.07.27.01.58.48
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of stefan.urba...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.47;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of stefan.urba...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=stefan.urba...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fa7so2333469wgb.4
for <databrewery@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer;
bh=FBdfWNUEOt/C0TrtuVcMuIrfeLm3w6Hfi4dbo+dpgLU=;
b=o1A+Y0f/I7+wXZLGbTJJ1kli2Q7RsjuO8zJ6lhBPbnzliznMjNcn5VUV46Kpl5GnMn
tOXcKZjgJygVPYPU417KFsOSDzDo2HV4X/DI1gZP9oHh4I51TSFAaVp+Wz5oieG4dpgy
AuOoEJmLodg5UGM/HTHZzBIjwX5NMZ41JMCbq/lpAg43dVpTv+9D1TgkZzqGns79xaxR
M1llQakDhubnZRmDXI3sfP1wSGF/8DNjtRiEbmwaxYQW+nsdMFALyroPl45WE/HhX3VQ
wIzIh2QkL4rgx/tUfFh/iorlf5rGmFAFZpU+ZMVpjTIb1yxziiymy4iixeeG4Fb5ep1n
qYEw==
Received: by 10.180.105.130 with SMTP id gm2mr20309468wib.6.1343379528505;
Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <stefan.urba...@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (ip-94-112-7-141.net.upcbroadband.cz. [94.112.7.141])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ef5sm4984334wib.3.2012.07.27.01.58.46
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stefan Urbanek <stefan.urba...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B4AFBA95-2587-4AD6-B6E8-439D8F046D5A"
Subject: Proposal: Using pandas as backend
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:58:45 +0200
Message-Id: <9B733060-583C-4F13-A71D-F4E7E07E4...@gmail.com>
To: databrewery@googlegroups.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
--Apple-Mail=_B4AFBA95-2587-4AD6-B6E8-439D8F046D5A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Hi,
Here is a proposal of using Pandas data analysis library as one of =
potential backends for Brewery:
http://blog.databrewery.org/post/28088920149
Note that having dependency on Pandas will impose dependency on numpy =
and couple other packages. I do not think that more dependencies it good =
idea, therefore it should be only an alternative. It will require =
different approach to stream construction and different Node interface.
What do you think?
Stefan
Twitter: @Stiivi
Home: http://stiivi.com
Brewery: http://databrewery.org
Github: https://github.com/Stiivi
--Apple-Mail=_B4AFBA95-2587-4AD6-B6E8-439D8F046D5A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
<html><head></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; =
">Hi,<div><br></div><div>Here is a proposal of using Pandas data =
analysis library as one of potential backends for =
Brewery:</div><div><br></div><div><a =
href=3D"http://blog.databrewery.org/post/28088920149">http://blog.databrew=
ery.org/post/28088920149</a></div><div><br></div><div>Note that having =
dependency on Pandas will impose dependency on numpy and couple other =
packages. I do not think that more dependencies it good idea, therefore =
it should be only an alternative. It will require different approach to =
stream construction and different Node =
interface.</div><div><br></div><div>What do you =
think?</div><div><br></div><div>Stefan</div><div><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true"><div style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; =
"><div><div><div><div style=3D"font-weight: normal; =
"><i><br></i></div><div style=3D"font-weight: normal; =
"><b>Twitter:</b> @Stiivi</div><div><div><div><div =
style=3D"font-style: normal; "><b>Home:</b><span =
class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-weight: normal; "> <a =
href=3D"http://stiivi.com">http://stiivi.com</a></span></div></div></div><=
div style=3D"font-style: normal; "><b>Brewery:</b><span =
class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-weight: normal; "> <a =
href=3D"http://databrewery.org">http://databrewery.org</a></span></div><di=
v style=3D"font-style: normal; "><b>Github:</b><span =
class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-weight: normal; =
"> </span><a =
href=3D"https://github.com/Stiivi">https://github.com/Stiivi</a></div><div=
><br></div></div></div></div></div></div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br></div></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_B4AFBA95-2587-4AD6-B6E8-439D8F046D5A--