Viking: Yes to Life on Mars

[andy lloyd]

Perhaps this won't come as too much of a shock to a deeply cynical
group such as ourselves, but it looks like NASA are about to make a
complete U-Turn on their 35 year long mantra about there being no life
on Mars. Here's the prelude, announced today:

'It's 99% certain there is life on Mars': Shock finding as scientists
re-analyse soil samples from Seventies Viking lander

-Soil samples from Viking 1 lander which visited Mars in 1976
-Mathematical analysis shows strong sign of organics
-Samples had been dismissed as contaminated
-'99% probability of life' claims one scientist


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2129152/Its-99-certain-life-Mars-Shock-finding-scientists-analyse-soil-samples-Seventies-Viking-lander.html#ixzz1rvDKhT8D

[Alan Cornette]

Yes. Probably contaminated with Anunnaki genes. Twenty-six years it took them to suddenly admit "Oh, we just cannot explain how we missed such an easy test." Their admissions will be a slow release of information over the next several years - maybe.  Maybe sooner because of nearing events they won't be able to hide. Al C.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dark Star Planet X" group.
To post to this group, send email to dark-star...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to dark-star-plane...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dark-star-planet-x?hl=en.

[mk23666]

Ohhh ohhh! They are gonna rush going to Mars now!

[Barry Warmkessel]

One of the anonymous members on our team worked on the Viking Lander team running the mission.

That person told of how the Lander's life science experiments had found life on Mars even when they were tested and could not find life on the beaches of California.

All the biologists agreed that microbial life had been found. 

The one who suppressed this information was Carl Sagan, and the entire team despised him because of it..

Of course, this was most likely at the behest of the oligarchy who control the USA.  Such was the fear of stimulating the possibility that ET life was possible, for then people would be asking about ET aliens visiting Earth.

Now that cat is out of the bag also.

DISCLOSURE CONFERENCE, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, 27 SEPTEMBER 2010 (EXTENDED VERSION, ENGLISH SUBTITLES) - Oct 8, 2010 
Declassified U.S. government documents and the testimony of former/retired military personnel confirm the reality of intermittent UFO activity at American nuclear missile sites over the years. Six of those veterans spoke about such incidents at my UFOs and Nukes press conference in Washington D.C. on September 27, 2010. CNN streamed the event live and a full-length video can be seen below: 
Another individual, retired U.S. Air Force Major Gaylan W. King, who was a Minuteman launch officer at Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, in the mid- 1960s, recently told me the following during a taped telephone conversation: 
I think this happened in 1967 but it may well have been in ’66. I was a Captain, a Missile [Combat] Crew Commander, with the 66th Strategic Missile Squadron. We experienced several cases of UFOs hovering over sites. Everyone knew that there were weird things going on.

Of course, our fearless leader is still clinging to the old mantra.

WHITE HOUSE DENIES CONTACT WITH SPACE ALIENS - November 8, 2011

My conclusion, 

The aliens may believe that our political leaders are genocidal psychopaths and may have terminated communications with them in order to save the human race from a nuclear holocaust. Our politicians in turn have responded in the only way they can by refusing to recognize the alien's existence.

> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:15:23 -0700
> Subject: Viking: Yes to Life on Mars
> From: andy...@hotmail.com
> To: dark-star...@googlegroups.com

[Alan Cornette]

What an admirable character Sagan was to most folks because of his eloquent presentations on his Nova programs. A "silver-tongue-devil," he was in this regard. He helped suppress many things because of academic narcissism (my belief). He absolutely hated Velikovsky because he (Velikovsky) directly opposed (later proven), Sagan's conclusions that Venus had a much milder atmosphere closely resembling the earth's. Quiet a verbal war occurred in the early 1950s because of Velikovsky's catastrophism theories. They prevented one publisher from printing his first book, threatening to take away their academic business. The same is true today with Sitchin's research. I know some academics cringe at the mention of Zecharia's name because to accept almost any part of his work means admitting the ET possibilities - the reason they avoid the simple, collision theory at the asteroid belt location.Yes, oligarchy is a great label. Some people will never get out of the academic box.  Al C.

[Lee]

I believe that Sitchin will be vindicated in our lifetimes.  Hopefully, the DIN.GER inscription they found in the so-called Jonah tomb ossuary will wake up the academics.  A number of academics at Hebrew University are studying the inscription as we speak!

--Lee

________________________________________
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com

[Gitanjali Dunbar]

Duh!

Gita.

http://www.world-science.net/othernews/120417_planets

Homeless planets may get adopted

April 17, 2012
Courtesy of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
and World Science staff

New re­search sug­gests that bil­lions of stars in our gal­axy have cap­tured rogue plan­ets that once roamed the voids be­tween stars.
The no­mad worlds, which were kicked out of the star sys­tems in which they formed, could oc­ca­sion­ally find a new home with a dif­fer­ent sun, as­tro­no­mers pro­pose. 

This could ex­plain the ex­ist­ence of some plan­ets that or­bit sur­pris­ingly far from their stars, and even the ex­ist­ence of a double-plan­et sys­tem.

Also ... electrical universe anyone?   http://www.world-science.net/othernews/120417_darkmatter

Where’s the dark matter? Not here, befuddled astronomers find

April 18, 2012
Courtesy of the European Southern Observatory
and World Science staff

Con­ven­tion­al as­tron­o­my holds that the­re’s a mys­te­ri­ous, in­vis­i­ble sub­stance called dark mat­ter, and though we don’t know its pre­cise na­ture, it per­me­ates much of the uni­verse.
       Now, con­ven­tion­al as­tron­o­my may have a prob­lem.

Dark mat­ter is not here, a new study has con­clud­ed. It might be somewhere else, but not in, or even any­where near, our so­lar sys­tem. And that’s a big prob­lem, be­cause it should be all over the gal­axy. 

To make mat­ter worse, dark mat­ter is still sadly very much needed to plug oth­er gaps in as­tro­nom­i­cal the­o­ries.

Dark mat­ter has been pre­viously iden­ti­fied based on what would seem to be gravita­t­ional forc­es ex­erted by vast blobs of this ma­te­ri­al, sur­round­ing and fill­ing ga­lax­ies. 

Yet the new stu­dy—the most ac­cu­rate to date of the mo­tions of stars in the Milky Way—turned up no ev­i­dence for dark mat­ter in a large zone around us, re­search­ers said.

...

“So if dark mat­ter is not pre­s­ent where we ex­pected it, a new so­lu­tion for the mis­sing mass prob­lem must be found. Our re­sults con­tra­dict the cur­rently ac­cept­ed mod­els. The mys­tery of dark mat­ter has just be­come even more mys­te­ri­ous."