Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
billing 88172
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Charlie Tudor  
View profile  
 More options Apr 27 2009, 9:49 pm
From: Charlie Tudor <cwtu...@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Apr 27 2009 9:49 pm
Subject: billing 88172

I too have started looking into this. One of our pathologists found an article in a book. I will give you the reference tomorrow after I get to work.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Feher, Stephen  
View profile  
 More options Apr 28 2009, 9:03 am
From: "Feher, Stephen" <sfe...@CMC-NH.ORG>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:03:13 -0400
Local: Tues, Apr 28 2009 9:03 am
Subject: RE: [CYTOPATHNET-L] billing 88172
Thanks Charlie.

Steve


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Charlie Tudor  
View profile  
 More options Apr 28 2009, 1:30 pm
From: Charlie Tudor <cwtu...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Apr 28 2009 1:30 pm
Subject: Re: [CYTOPATHNET-L] Re: billing 88172

immediate interpretation by pathologist  88172-26
                            Cytotech     88172-TC

Page 467

Cytology Diagnostic Principles and Clinical Correlates
Cibas Ducatman

Second edition

I have not read all the text yet.

--- On Tue, 4/28/09, Feher, Stephen <sfe...@CMC-NH.ORG> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Feher, Stephen  
View profile  
 More options Apr 28 2009, 1:37 pm
From: "Feher, Stephen" <sfe...@CMC-NH.ORG>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:37:05 -0400
Local: Tues, Apr 28 2009 1:37 pm
Subject: RE: [CYTOPATHNET-L] Re: billing 88172
Thanks again Charlie.  I wonder how many labs are not billing when the cytotech does the immediate read for fear of being audited and fined for overcharging.  I know, for example, that ASC states that it is perfectly reasonable to bill for the cytotech doing the adequacy assessment.  CAP and the AMA (which is the guidance most coders look to) say that 88172 is a pathologist only code and that it is not proper to bill for the cytotech providing that service.

Steve


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »