> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:46 PM, darrinholst <darrin.ho
...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > try replacing :surplus_row => false with :missing_row => false, which
> > reads don't raise if the expected table has missing rows...I think:)
> But the table passed as an argument to diff! doesn't have missing rows
> - it has surplus rows. There is definitely a bug. See my other post.
> Aslak
> > On Jan 29, 4:37 am, senny <yves.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hey there
> >> I am trying to write a step definition that only raises an error when
> >> the data specified in the feature is not present in the actual table.
> >> The step definition should NOT raise when the actual table contains
> >> more data than the one specified in the feature file. I have created a
> >> Gist to illustrate my problem:http://gist.github.com/289623
> >> Is there a way to make this scenario pass?
> >> Cheers,
> >> Senny
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cukes" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to cukes@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cukes+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cukes?hl=en.
