Well, Spindle motors, saw arbor motors etc are always useful - as to
re-designing stuff - I don't mind, since that opens the door for a few
more people to use what is available to THEM to get a working design
as opposed to whats been specc'd so far- the only hitch is, I'm not
very fast - since I have the usual excuse of too many Irons in the
fire...
I'm neutral on purchased parts at this point - a lot of the stuff the
project needs, it cannot make, and no open source equivalent is
available.
In the long term goal is to make every part the system needs ON THE
SYTEM. I expect this to take several years at best.
Here are the prints for the parts I have designed, had made, and
validated so far:
http://www.cubespawn.com/625Motion.html
its actually a pretty short list since I'm trying to keep it simple
and re-use part # wherever possible (design one part to do multiple
things)
A design philosophy rule I'm also applying is simple parts that can be
made with simple shop tools in the initial efforts - with more
sophisticated designs coming later.
The basic premise of the whole system is the cubic frames, they
fulfill 5 basic machine requirements:
A structural Framework
Power and data connections, so that several cubes can be linked
a pallet transporter - so that workpieces can move from one cube to
another without manual intervention or an external handling system
(here is an (incomplete) sketch showing how a system can be composed
of a few cubes)
http://www.cubespawn.com/designs.html#System_Concept
Modularity - all the cubes have the same external and interface
dimensions regardless of the materials they are constructed from so
that regardless of the designer - they are inter-operable by nature
Scaleability - they are based on "modular coordination"
http://www.cubespawn.com/index.html (middle of the page)
so the prototypes are being built at 600mm but they could just as
easily have been 1200mm- the smaller size was felt to be a reasonable
balance between usefulness and cost.
And, lest you think is all hypothetical here is a pic of the motion
module a couple days ago:
https://picasaweb.google.com/cubespawn/Apr192011CubeSnaps#
So the bottom line is I'd like to draw up a Bosch design, probably
just modify the 80/20 drawings dimensions, but I'm not certain how
quickly I can get it done.
the last couple weeks have revolved around jelling up the concept for
the first implementation of the motion control electronics
-snip-
...the setup is EMC on a dell GX620 in Ubuntu LTS 10.4
the breakout board is this
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170534793516&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT
(we'll roll our own when we decide what the controller should be)
I'm using 4 of these motor controllers
http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10267
(might be a little light duty) 2 are slaved to Y's outputs
and this motor:
http://www.circuitspecialists.com/prod.itml/icOid/8927
spec sheet here
http://www.circuitspecialists.com/products/pdf/57BYGH207.pdf ...
-snip-
Sorry for the "wall of text" but without voice and arm waving its hard
to describe ;-)
James
On Apr 22, 10:48 am, "Joshua D. Johnson" <
objectsunlimi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> These are not stepper or Servo motors just plain old AC italian units, they
> would be used for small machine tools, repowering drill presses, saws. etc.
> We need to find a regular/replicable source for parts. I prefer not using
> asian materials but am open to it if I don't have to pay through the nose
> for shipping and there is some guarantee. I just gave away a bunch of NEMA
> 24's as a trade that I wasn't able to collect on.. those were Kelings and
> looked pretty decent.
> I guess I don't want you to go through the trouble of having to modify
> designs for Bosch extrusions just because. I'll keep them and use them to
> support the cause on my side.
>
> I'd like to see more info on this project in terms of recent activity..
> Where does development currently sit? what types of goals/metrics have been
> set?
>
> JOSH
>