From: "Wei Dai" <wei...@weidai.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:01:22 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2007 10:01 pm
Subject: Re: Is SHA224 supported for ECDSA<ECP, SHA224>? - urgent
There are no plans for further FIPS validated versions at this point. The
FIPS testing costs about $30000 per release. The reason they were being done is that Groove Networks (now part of Microsoft) needed new FIPS validated versions as they upgraded their compiler from MSVC 6 to 2003 to 2005, and was willing to pay for the testing. I was going to suggest that you use Crypto++ 5.3 if you need FIPS -------------------------------------------------- > I have just built version 5.5.2 of crypto++ and it worked fine! This > By the way, will 5.5.2 be FIPS certified at some point? > Christian > On Sep 29, 9:09 pm, greatx <bercz...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> I am using: >> The error compiling: >> Am I using a version that is too old? Maybe I should more to 5.5.2? (I >> Thank you. >> Christian >> On Sep 29, 6:25 pm, "Wei Dai" <wei...@weidai.com> wrote: >> > It works fine for me with MSVC 2005 and Crypto++ 5.5.2. Please post the >> > * exact error message >> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > > I need to use the folowing: >> > > ECDSA<ECP, SHA>::Signer sig1; >> > > but I see that SHA224 does not build. Is this not supported in >> > > Thank you. >> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> - Show quoted text - You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||