Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Crypto++ Users
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Test suite failure on armel arch
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jens Peter Secher  
View profile  
 More options Mar 23 2011, 7:33 pm
From: Jens Peter Secher <j...@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:33:45 +0100
Local: Wed, Mar 23 2011 7:33 pm
Subject: Test suite failure on armel arch
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Hi, I have uploaded 5.6.1 to the main Debian archive for inclusion in
the next release (Wheezy), but the test suite fails [1] for the "armel"
achitecture [2] in the following sense:

Testing MAC algorithm Panama-BE.
AlgorithmType: SymmetricCipher
Ciphertext: F07F5FF2CCD01A0A7D44ACD6D239C2AF0DA1FF35275BAF5DFA6E09411B79D8B9
IV: 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f
Key: 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f
Name: Panama-LE
Plaintext: 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f
Source: generated by Crypto++ 5.2.1
Test: Encrypt
....
Testing SymmetricCipher algorithm Panama-LE.
incorrectly encrypted:
F04607D2CCD41E0E7D48A0DAD23DC6AB0DBDE329275FAB59FA62054D1B7DDCBD

I am not really sure how to debug this...

Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1.

A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?

 [1]
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libcrypto%2B%2B;ver=5.6.1-2;a...
.
 [2] http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort .


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Marshall Clow  
View profile  
 More options Mar 23 2011, 7:43 pm
From: Marshall Clow <mclow.li...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:43:44 -0700
Local: Wed, Mar 23 2011 7:43 pm
Subject: Re: Test suite failure on armel arch
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Mar 23, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Jens Peter Secher wrote:

I'm doing some testing with the llvm compiler (http://llvm.org) on x86, and the Panama tests are also failing for me (fails at -O2, passes at -O0)

If I had to bet, I would guess that my problem is with llvm, but I'm mentioning it here as an extra data point.

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:mclow.li...@gmail.com>

A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
        -- Yu Suzuki


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wei Dai  
View profile  
 More options Mar 24 2011, 9:53 pm
From: Wei Dai <wei...@weidai.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:53:19 -0700
Local: Thurs, Mar 24 2011 9:53 pm
Subject: Re: Test suite failure on armel arch
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
The armel machines in the GCC compile farm
(http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm) are all offline. How can I get a shell
account on a live armel machine to debug this?

Or, if you want to try debugging this yourself, use 2 machines, one armel,
another one where Crypto++ works, set some breakpoints in panama.cpp, and
step through the code to see where they start to differ.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jens Peter Secher  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2011, 7:02 pm
From: Jens Peter Secher <j...@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:02:01 +0200
Local: Mon, Apr 11 2011 7:02 pm
Subject: Re: Test suite failure on armel arch
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 2011-03-25 02:53, Wei Dai wrote:

> The armel machines in the GCC compile farm
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm) are all offline. How can I get a
> shell account on a live armel machine to debug this?

[Sorry for the late reply, I was without internet access for a long time.]

I will see what I can do...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zooko O'Whielacronx  
View profile  
 More options Apr 12 2011, 8:57 pm
From: "Zooko O'Whielacronx" <zo...@zooko.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:57:45 -0600
Local: Tues, Apr 12 2011 8:57 pm
Subject: Re: Test suite failure on armel arch
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Jens Peter Secher <j...@debian.org> wrote:

> On 2011-03-25 02:53, Wei Dai wrote:
>> The armel machines in the GCC compile farm
>> (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm) are all offline. How can I get a
>> shell account on a live armel machine to debug this?

> [Sorry for the late reply, I was without internet access for a long time.]

> I will see what I can do...

Also the Tahoe-LAFS Software Foundation will have a SheevaPlug
delivered to your house if you but ask. :-)

Regards,

Zooko


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google