Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Cromemco CLD

Received: by 10.68.232.169 with SMTP id tp9mr11959962pbc.6.1333517835340;
        Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: cromemco@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.134.39 with SMTP id ph7ls1393142pbb.4.gmail; Tue, 03 Apr
 2012 22:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.197.37 with SMTP id ir5mr1661181pbc.11.1333517835187; Tue,
 03 Apr 2012 22:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 br...@getdata.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=br...@getdata.com; dkim=pass
 header...@getdata.com
Received: by z3g2000pbn.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:37:15
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DC17F5DAA19646788ADF030D6B68A517@vl420mt>
References: <7bbaf940-eb5f-4cf6-abec-1a99d501992e@wr2g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <4f7ae9e2.a16a320a.1d68.fffff7afSMTPIN_ADDED@gmr-mx.google.com>
 <40894830-6e65-4f49-9bec-b20ecbe09d6a@t8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com>
 <91CC63EC54D246588289142D7948702A@vl420mt> <e36f03cf-1be2-4aa5-b863-c075cf048a45@px4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <DC17F5DAA19646788ADF030D6B68A517@vl420mt>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:11.0)
 Gecko/20120325 Firefox/11.0.1-x64 PaleMoon/11.0.1-x64,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <972e3534-ba66-44e4-891c-285cccf955d7@z3g2000pbn.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Cromemco CLD
From: bah <br...@getdata.com>
To: Cromemco <cromemco@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mike,
Boring indeed.  My imagination was running wild with new fantastic
graphics capabilities.  By any chance do you know the replacement part
numbers and xtals?  It might be that there is a "faster" CRTC chip
that they used or something - though I can't find a plugin replacement
for the CRTC 8275 (Intel).  It might be just a technote if something
goes wrong with it.  Thanks for the info.
Brett


On Apr 4, 2:47=A0pm, "MikeS" <dm...@torfree.net> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bah" <br...@getdata.com>
> To: "Cromemco" <cromemco@googlegroups.com>
>
> If anyone has the technotes on C-10 specifics I would appreciate any
> scans if possible. =A0Especially the really interesting ones like:
> "Installing New Video Chip for C-5, C-10, C-10A", #023-9217
>
> Thanks
> Brett
> ---------
> It doesn't say much; basically, "Replace video chip and two crystals with=
 a
> different video chip and crystals," with part #s and xtal frequencies.
>