Darwinism's Unscientific Formula
Saam
Civilization
(For full scientific refutation of Darwinism, please download the book
from: http://www.harunyahya.com/refuted1.php)
When the subject of evolution comes up, many people imagine that this
is a scientific problem-and that for anyone less knowledgeable than
scientists, Darwinism is impossible to understand. They assume it's
pointless to argue the issue, one way or the other. Indeed, Darwinists
employ Latin words and scientific terms generally unfamiliar to the
public in order to encourage this mistaken idea. They engage in
complicated descriptions and frequently resort to demagoguery and
hollow slogans in order to give the impression they are discussing a
highly scientific matter.
In fact, however, Darwinism's basic claim is completely unscientific,
and its logical poverty is so obvious that even primary school age
children can see it. According to Darwinism, in some unexplained
manner, the first cell supposedly formed in the Earth's primeval
environment, in a pool of muddy water. And out of that single cell, a
literally endless series of coincidences later gave rise to animals,
plants, human beings and civilizations. In other words, all of
mankind, as well as the entire plant and animal kingdoms, are
supposedly the work of an ideal quantity of mud, a long period of time
and plentiful coincidences.
One would have to lack any facility to understand and reason in order
to believe that through coincidences, mud eventually gave rise to
civilizations. Anyone capable of thinking and drawing appropriate
conclusions can't possibly be taken in by Darwinist errors.
According to Darwinists, who are suffering from an obvious logical
deficiency, these materials, each one of which is unconscious, gave
rise to human beings possessed of reason and conscience, who think,
love, feel compassion, possess sound judgment, produce paintings and
statues, compose symphonies, write novels, build skyscrapers,
construct nuclear reactors, discover the causes of diseases and
manufacture drugs to cure them, or engage in politics. They claim that
when sufficient time had passed, lions, tigers, rabbits, deer,
elephants, cats, dogs, moths, flies, crocodiles and birds all evolved
by chance from muddy water.
A whole range of fruits and vegetables, with their own unique tastes
and smells-oranges, strawberries, bananas, apples, grapes, tomatoes,
peppers-flowers with their matchless appearances and other plants all
emerged from that same mud. In short, ever since Darwin's time,
countless articles, papers, films, newspaper reports, magazine
articles and television programs have repeated the evolutionist
scenario in which all of life emerged by chance from mud.
In other words, if you ask a Darwinist "How did our civilization
arise?" or, "How did such a wide range of life forms come into being?"
or, "How did mankind come into existence?" the essential answer you
will receive is this: Coincidences gave rise to all these things from
mud, over the course of time.
The Darwinist scenario of "life emerging from mud" can no longer
deceive people. Any rational person can immediately see the
nonsensical premise of the theory of evolution.
One would doubtless need to be devoid of reason or lack any facility
for understanding in order to believe such a tale. Yet surprisingly,
that very irrational and illogical theory has had its adherents for
many years and is still being propagated constantly under a scientific
guise.
The Lies of Darwinism Have Been Unmasked
Scientific evidence has revealed that the "sequence" of equine
evolution, long portrayed as one of the strongest pieces of evidence
for evolution, is untrue-and wholly imaginary.
The theory of evolution, first proposed under the primitive conditions
of the 19th century, has been disproved by advances in science and
technology. It has been recognized that Darwin's claims are totally
unrealistic: Natural selection and mutations, cited as the mechanisms
that drive the process of evolution, have no effects of the kind
envisaged by Darwinists. In short, it is impossible for them to give
rise to new species.
The final death blow to Darwinism was dealt by the fossil record.
Darwin claimed that all the millions of different life forms had come
into being through descent from a supposed single common ancestor.
In order for his claim to be verified, there should be traces in the
fossil record-an irrefutable document of natural history-of this
supposed primitive ancestor and of the various life forms that
developed from it. For example, if all mammals were descended from
reptiles, as evolutionists maintain, then there would have to be
fossil remains of a series of half-mammalian, half-reptilian life
forms.
To date, millions of fossils, belonging to a great many species, have
been unearthed during excavations. Yet not a single one showing a
transition between species has ever been found. Every fossil ever
found shows that each living thing emerged suddenly, with all its
characteristics complete. In other words, every species of plant and
animal was created.
Confronted by this fact, evolutionists have resorted to various
falsehoods. They have produced hoaxes-counterfeit, artificial fossils
that have come to be regarded as disgraces to paleontology. They have
tried to deceive the lay public by tampering with genuine fossils of
extinct life forms and inventing a series of imaginary scenarios. One
of the best known of them is the so-called "evolution of the horse."
Fossils belonging to entirely different species that once lived in
India, South America, North America and Europe were arranged in order
of size-from small to large-in the light of evolutionist imaginations.
So far, different researchers have come up with more than 20 different
equine evolution scenarios. There is no agreement among them regarding
all these completely different family trees. The one point they
commonly agree upon is their belief that a dog-like creature known as
Eohippus (or Hyracotherium) that lived in the Eocene epoch (54 to 37
million years ago) was the very first ancestor of today's horses.
However, Eohippus-portrayed as the ancestor of the horse and that
became extinct millions of years ago-is almost identical to the
present-day animal known as the hyrax, which looks nothing like a
horse and is totally unrelated to that species.
Moreover, it has been established that breeds of horse living today
have also been discovered in the same rock strata as Eohippus. (See
Francis Hitching's The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong,
New York: Ticknor and Fields, 1982, pp. 30-31.) This means that the
horse and its supposed ancestor were both living at the same time,
which proves that the horse never underwent any such process as
evolution.
The invalidity of the "equine series" proposed by evolutionists also
applies to birds, fish, reptiles and mammals, in short, to all living
things, to their supposedly common ancestors and supposed family
trees. It has been determined that every fossil species suggested as
being the ancestor of some other living thing either belongs to an
independent extinct life form or is the result of evolutionists
tampering with fossils of the species in question.
Darwinism has been exposed as the most wide-ranging and astonishing
deception in the world's history. That millions have been taken in by
this deception, as if hypnotized, and have been influenced by all of
Darwinism's illogical claims, is truly miraculous. The support lent to
the theory of evolution and the acceptance it has enjoyed up to now
are the result of tricks played on mankind by satan, who urges vast
numbers of people towards Darwinism.
Until recently, no one had the courage to unmask this ruse of satan's
and to publicize the true facts. But in the present century, the
response to this deception has finally been laid out in full detail,
and the public has been made fully aware of the state of affairs. By
the will of God, the collapse of Darwinism has advanced beyond any
point of recovery. Indeed, that is the fundamental reason for the
panic in the Darwinian global empire.
