cream-browser developers

Contact owners and managers

1–28 of 28

0 selected

2/4/12

[linkdd/cream-browser] e5c17b: Start plugin system

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] e5c17b: Start plugin system

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

2/4/12

2/3/12

[linkdd/cream-browser] 19fd47: [buildsys] Use FindLua51.cmake instead of pkg-conf...

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 19fd47: [buildsys] Use FindLua51.cmake instead of pkg-conf...

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

2/3/12

2/3/12

[linkdd/cream-browser] 309bc4: Use map/unmap instead of show/hide on the progress...

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 309bc4: Use map/unmap instead of show/hide on the progress...

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

2/3/12

10/10/11

[linkdd/cream-browser] 2846eb: Manage plstblog's index via jQuery.dataTables

Branch: refs/heads/gh-pages Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 2846eb: Manage plstblog's index via jQuery.dataTables

Branch: refs/heads/gh-pages Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

10/10/11

10/7/11

[linkdd/cream-browser] 73c927: [index.html] Update features section

Branch: refs/heads/gh-pages Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 73c927: [index.html] Update features section

Branch: refs/heads/gh-pages Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

10/7/11

10/7/11

[linkdd/cream-browser] 7f1998: Remove lua bindings for statusbar (not used)

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 7f1998: Remove lua bindings for statusbar (not used)

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

10/7/11

10/7/11

[linkdd/cream-browser] 9292b6: Add CNAME file

Branch: refs/heads/gh-pages Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 9292b6: Add CNAME file

Branch: refs/heads/gh-pages Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

10/7/11

10/7/11

[linkdd/cream-browser] 5b3083: Initial commit

Branch: refs/heads/gh-pages Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 5b3083: Initial commit

Branch: refs/heads/gh-pages Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

10/7/11

10/3/11

[linkdd/cream-browser] 774f92: Update README; Manage commands history in cache

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 774f92: Update README; Manage commands history in cache

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

10/3/11

10/4/11

[linkdd/cream-browser] c23c38: Restore commands cache when creating Inputbox obje...

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] c23c38: Restore commands cache when creating Inputbox obje...

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

10/4/11

9/29/11

[linkdd/cream-browser] 7a74e5: Redocumment all the code

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

unread,

[linkdd/cream-browser] 7a74e5: Redocumment all the code

Branch: refs/heads/unstable Home: https://github.com/linkdd/cream-browser Commit:

9/29/11

9/27/11

Cream-Browser is now using GtkApplication

Now, Cream-Browser is totally under GTK+-3.0 It's the opportunity to use some features available

unread,

Cream-Browser is now using GtkApplication

Now, Cream-Browser is totally under GTK+-3.0 It's the opportunity to use some features available

9/27/11

9/23/11

I'm glad to announce this to you. After removing the GTK+-2.0 support, I was able to use some

unread,

I'm glad to announce this to you. After removing the GTK+-2.0 support, I was able to use some

9/23/11

9/22/11

GTK+-2.0 not supported anymore

Today I have removed support for GTK+-2.0 (and unfortunately DirectFB, because GTK+-3.0 does not

unread,

GTK+-2.0 not supported anymore

Today I have removed support for GTK+-2.0 (and unfortunately DirectFB, because GTK+-3.0 does not

9/22/11

David Delassus, Custom Processing Unlimited2

9/8/11

GREAT!!!! glad to hear it, man... looking forward to a release! -- If "custom" was mass

unread,

GREAT!!!! glad to hear it, man... looking forward to a release! -- If "custom" was mass

9/8/11

Custom Processing Unlimited

6/27/11

Re: Re : Re: GModule are not usable.

still watching and keeping track... waiting for the "READY" signal! :D -- If "custom

unread,

Re: Re : Re: GModule are not usable.

still watching and keeping track... waiting for the "READY" signal! :D -- If "custom

6/27/11

David Delassus, … Elouan Pignet4

6/27/11

GModule are not usable.

It's done, the GModule support was replaced by a static modules support. GObject proposes a very

unread,

GModule are not usable.

It's done, the GModule support was replaced by a static modules support. GObject proposes a very

6/27/11

Custom Processing Unlimited

6/14/11

Re: Re : Re: SplittedWindow

haha... nice!!! -- If "custom" was mass produced... it would just be a "product line.

unread,

Re: Re : Re: SplittedWindow

haha... nice!!! -- If "custom" was mass produced... it would just be a "product line.

6/14/11

David Delassus, Custom Processing Unlimited7

6/14/11

Yes, the SplittedWindow (now called GtkVimSplit) is finished, enjoy your browser which does nothing

unread,

Yes, the SplittedWindow (now called GtkVimSplit) is finished, enjoy your browser which does nothing

6/14/11

David Delassus, Custom Processing Unlimited4

6/2/11

HAHA, nice!!! -- If "custom" was mass produced... it would just be a "product line.

unread,

HAHA, nice!!! -- If "custom" was mass produced... it would just be a "product line.

6/2/11

David Delassus, Custom Processing Unlimited5

5/29/11

Gettext support

OHHH ok... you can tell I don't know much about this stuff (yet)... -- If "custom" was

unread,

Gettext support

OHHH ok... you can tell I don't know much about this stuff (yet)... -- If "custom" was

5/29/11

David Delassus, Custom Processing Unlimited6

5/26/11

Cream-Browser's blog

Very nice! :D -- If "custom" was mass produced... it would just be a "product line.

unread,

Cream-Browser's blog

Very nice! :D -- If "custom" was mass produced... it would just be a "product line.

5/26/11

David Delassus, Custom Processing Unlimited5

5/11/11

GTK+ on DirectFB for Embedded System

Thank you! will look into this first chance I get tonight... -- If "custom" was mass

unread,

GTK+ on DirectFB for Embedded System

Thank you! will look into this first chance I get tonight... -- If "custom" was mass

5/11/11

Custom Processing Unlimited, David Delassus3

5/4/11

I see... it would be a huge help because a LOT of sites I do business with ordering computer parts

unread,

I see... it would be a huge help because a LOT of sites I do business with ordering computer parts

5/4/11

David Delassus, Custom Processing Unlimited2

5/4/11

RE : Re: RE : Re: [creambrowser devel] Re: CMake issue...

ok... enough said. :D -- If "custom" was mass produced... it would just be a "product

unread,

RE : Re: RE : Re: [creambrowser devel] Re: CMake issue...

ok... enough said. :D -- If "custom" was mass produced... it would just be a "product

5/4/11

David Delassus, Custom Processing Unlimited2

5/4/11

RE : Re: [creambrowser devel] Re: CMake issue...

OK.. well, hopefully the current maintainer of the package for Arch Linux will be removed so the

unread,

RE : Re: [creambrowser devel] Re: CMake issue...

OK.. well, hopefully the current maintainer of the package for Arch Linux will be removed so the

5/4/11

Custom Processing Unlimited, David Delassus3

5/4/11

hmm... I see... your page says that you will be making a PKGBUILD for Arch Linux at some point...

unread,

hmm... I see... your page says that you will be making a PKGBUILD for Arch Linux at some point...

5/4/11

Custom Processing Unlimited, David Delassus5

5/3/11

that's cool... see what they're offering, as I'm not sure how soon I'd have something

unread,locked,

that's cool... see what they're offering, as I'm not sure how soon I'd have something

5/3/11

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu