Steve,
We have discussed landing through a gradient once, and I have been experiencing this more often than I would like without the results I prefer.
So, when I am coming in for a headwind landing, and at (whatever) altitude there is no wind or even sink, what is the action to take?
I recall that you mentioned to come in fast and keep the energy up, but how do you really control that?
When setting up a landing, I feel that I am not slowing the glider in any way, but at that 25-20-15 foot range this is where I experience the sudden drop of speed or lift.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Doug
Douglas Jackson, CLTC
Agent, Business and Personal Insurance and Retirement Planning
New York Life Insurance Company
500 Liberty Street SE, Suite 500
Salem, OR 97301
Cell 541-981-9123
Fax 503-375-6302
If you do not wish to receive email communications from New York Life please reply to this email, using the words "Opt Out" in the signature line. Please copy email_...@newyorklife.com
New York Life Insurance, 51 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10010
On 7/26/2012 4:33 PM, Douglas W Jackson wrote:
Steve,
We have discussed landing through a gradient once, and I have been experiencing this more often than I would like without the results I prefer.
So, when I am coming in for a headwind landing, and at (whatever) altitude there is no wind or even sink, what is the action to take?
I recall that you mentioned to come in fast and keep the energy up, but how do you really control that?
When setting up a landing, I feel that I am not slowing the glider in any way, but at that 25-20-15 foot range this is where I experience the sudden drop of speed or lift.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Doug
Douglas Jackson, CLTC
Agent, Business and Personal Insurance and Retirement Planning
New York Life Insurance Company
500 Liberty Street SE, Suite 500
Salem, OR 97301
Cell 541-981-9123
Fax 503-375-6302
<Mail Attachment.jpeg>
If you do not wish to receive email communications from New York Life please reply to this email, using the words "Opt Out" in the signature line. Please copy email_...@newyorklife.com
New York Life Insurance, 51 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10010
See you
up there,
Brad and Maren
Your 'Couple' of Instructors
www.DiscoverParagliding.com
503-861-2772 (W) 503-440-0733 (c)
I always cringe when I hear the "keep the reserve option " anytime your flight might bring you close to the terrain. I've seen some amazingly low tosses that somehow the pilot miraculously survived. In many case what saved them wasn't the reduced vertical velocity, but rather the reserve blossomed and they ended up getting drug as they were touching down (crashing…). This changed the impact to more of a sliding motion allowing the energy to dissipate over time, rather than have the pilot experience a sudden stop.
BUT… I've also seen pilots increase their vertical descent rate and pound into the lake several times, from last minute tosses after a maneuver had gone bad and they throw as the last second. As the reserve starts to open the paraglider if it's still open down planes and literally drags the pilot towards the surface before the reserve can fully open.
IF there is enough height, the reserve opens and things get stable. I personally believe there is a dead man's curve where I'm going to be better off flying my wing or what's left of it, that tossing my reserve.
But then as pilots, the reserve is yet another option in our bag of tricks. Have you ever tossed yours yet and seen what actually happens. It's certainly not for everyone, but I believe there is merit in intentional reserve tosses. My favorites by far are the ones that simply don't work. It's much better to find that out over the water, with rescue at hand.
Just a thought.
Stu
Stu wrote:
“I personally believe there is a dead man's curve…”
And while I understand the sentiment, I flinched at what could be channeling Rick Masters.
I threw very low once out of necessity. Of course my wing began flying again just as the reserve left my hand. The reserve opening increased my vertical speed for a few moments as I swung backwards underneath it, then again as the main started downplaning.
Not that I’m advocating not throwing when low. Rather that a successful reserve toss doesn’t mean you are out of the woods - particularly at low altitude. Stu’s suggestion of practicing it in a safe environment is a good idea.
Paul
500' isn't low for a reserve toss IMHO, nor is 150'. I tossed mine at less than 300' and it worked remarkably well. Of course I was still on tow, and some day I'll have to try that again to see if a person can climb out on tow under a reserve.
How about something different… let's say you take a big 50% asymmetric collapse at 70 feet on approach. Do you throw, or fly what's left?
Or how about you took a big whack at 100' and managed it well, unfortunately it reinflated with a big cravatte which is inducing a turn. You can control the turn with wieghtshift and brake but you still have a 40% collapse. Do you fly what's left, or go for the reserve, letting the glider wind up as you reach for the handle?
I don't think the equation is as simple as if you're below this altitude huck…
From: cp...@googlegroups.com [mailto:cp...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of skf...@effectnet.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 11:10 AM
To: Stuart Caruk; cp...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: CPC: Re: question on pg landings
I meant low as in 500' and will remind myself where the reserve handle is what it is for when flying big air sites. Option was a bad phrase. Regardless of the outcomes at SIV's reserves seem to work incredibly well in the real world and I am sure there are more pilots that are glad they deployed and ones (or loved ones) that wished they had then ones thinking they should not have deployed.