Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Pine Mountain Flight Report 7-21-12
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Stan Mordensky  
View profile  
 More options Jul 23 2012, 12:50 pm
From: Stan Mordensky <stan.morden...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:50:03 -0700
Local: Mon, Jul 23 2012 12:50 pm
Subject: Pine Mountain Flight Report 7-21-12

I headed out Saturday afternoon for Pine Mountain. Arriving there around 4
gave me time to relax from the long ride and rest in the shade. Around 6pm,
Ray gave me a ride to the glass-off launch. There I met both of DAR's Tims
and several others. Bill was the first to launch and got an extended
sledder. I launched at 7pm after several other locals were already in the
air giving very positive condition reports. The air was a mostly smooth
with the remnants of some thermals popping the wing every now and again,
but nothing I hadn't flown in before. Eventually, the air went completely
smooth and I found myself several hundred feet above the first bench. I
followed another glider toward the Pine Mountain peak to try to bench up
past the summit. The glider I was following lost altitude ahead of me and
got a little too close to the ground and trees for my taste especially in
air that was new to me, so I turned into the wind to work the ridge and
gain some altitude before working any deeper into the mountain. I then
realized I wasn't moving forward or backward. I was in front of the saddle
that had been mentioned to me during the site introduction. Everyone said
conditions were too light to be concerned about the venturi effect on that
evening, but nonetheless my heart rate increased a little. I slowly applied
more and more speed bar, checking the wing for signs of collapse - none
(Yay SIV clinic for giving me that knowledge and confidence). At full bar I
was making a little headway, but I had no intent on staying around for
conditions to possibly change and send me over the back, so I crabbed
toward forward toward the east like had been advised if I found myself in
just such a situation. When I felt like I was clear of the saddle with
comfortable ground speed I relaxed. Turning around I saw that I had gained
~800-1000ft and was now above the summit (I fly sans vario and GPS). It was
great. I spent the rest of the evening exploring the north side of Pine
Mountain, though it t took me an hour before I could muster the courage to
work my way back toward the summit giving the saddle a wide margin every on
each future pass.

I watched countless wing-overs and spirals from my harness and did a few
spirals myself. The lift was so consistent and abundant that little
altitude was lost. As the sun set behind the Sisters the others began to
land and I figured I should do as they do since this was my first real Pine
Mountain glass-off and there may be conditions unknown to me approaching. I
found myself doing several 360s, banked turns, and a whole lot of big ears
to get down. Everyone was packing up on the peat gravel, so I landed
uneventfully in the middle of the parking lot. Even in the twilight, the LZ
had some ups and downs on approach.

In the future, I will probably add some ballast to my harness to give
myself a bit more penetrating power. None of the other pilots said they had
trouble with the venturi effect at the saddle like I did that night. I also
stay up a little longer, weather permitting. Thinking I should follow the
locals down, I found out they landed because they wanted to. There was
still another 30 min of good air time. I asked what to do if the air went
catabatic before landing. They informed me to reverse approach and land
toward the mountain. Makes sense.

Awesome night. Got to fly with a different crew and make new friends. I
hope to head out there again sometime in the next week.

Stan

--
Stan Mordensky | M.S. Candidate | University of Oregon |
Eugene, OR 97403-1272 | (301)-639-8619 | stanl...@uoregon.edu |


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "CPC: Pine Mountain Flight Report 7-21-12" by Discover Paragliding!
Discover Paragliding!  
View profile  
 More options Jul 23 2012, 3:31 pm
From: "Discover Paragliding!" <BradandMa...@DiscoverParagliding.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:31:07 -0700
Local: Mon, Jul 23 2012 3:31 pm
Subject: Re: CPC: Pine Mountain Flight Report 7-21-12

Stan,

Two things I would offer an opinion on:

1. Ballast. Not really my favorite thing, especially in the early years
of flying. If for no other reason, if you do land hard, you have that
much more weight and inertia to splat you into the ground unforgivingly.

2. Catabatic flows. Quite often when evening flying, you may encounter a
the chance of a catabatic flow. Most often, even though you might not
know the exact direction of the wind, there are likely two primary
directions that it might be coming from. Up the hill, or down the hill.
Also frequently, these two 'opposites' might be less than 180 degrees
opposite and you can simply plot your final to split the difference
between the two wind directions. (Pine would be heading up the road
towards the mountain more or less.) If there is time and altitude, you
can alter your course more into the actual wind direction before
landing. A 90 degree cross wind landing is really only a zero wind
landing with a bit of sideways drift. If the sideways drift is strong
enough to be a problem, figuring out the wind direction should have
already been easy. Risking a zero wind landing with a bit of drift, is
(almost) always better that risking a downwind landing, or a quick 180
on final. Don't forget about the possibilities of using an asymmetric
flare. (Area B is an excellent place to practice that to the extreme!)

Hope this helps,

Brad

See you up there,

Brad and Maren
Your 'Couple' of Instructors
www.DiscoverParagliding.com <http://www.DiscoverParagliding.com/>
503-861-2772 (W) 503-440-0733 (c)

On 7/23/2012 9:50 AM, Stan Mordensky wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stan Mordensky  
View profile  
 More options Jul 23 2012, 5:26 pm
From: Stan Mordensky <stan.morden...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:26:15 -0700
Local: Mon, Jul 23 2012 5:26 pm
Subject: Re: CPC: Pine Mountain Flight Report 7-21-12

Brad,

I have similar sentiments on ballast and I'm glad to hear yours. In the end
its a trade off between how rough I think the landing could be vs. being
blown back. The fact that the other pilots remarked about the conditions
being anything but strong means that either cannot fly in slightly stronger
conditions than Saturday night or I play with ballast. The winds at launch
were peaking around 12-13mph and toughing near 8mph, so the wind was not
exceptionally strong or variable.

I should add under those conditions I had no problem maintaining positive
ground velocity away from the saddle, so it will probably come down to just
avoiding the saddle completely on stronger nights or in the early evening
when wind speed is more variable.

I liked your idea for a cross wind landing when the anabatic-catabatic
conditions are not certain. It makes a lot of sense and would have worked
Saturday night. Fortunately, I had no problem checking the streamers at the
mid-launch and LZ on my approach, but I'll keep it all in mind should I
find myself without wind indicators.

Thanks for the input Brad,
Stan

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Discover Paragliding! <

--
Stan Mordensky | M.S. Candidate | University of Oregon |
Eugene, OR 97403-1272 | (301)-639-8619 | stanl...@uoregon.edu |

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »