So on my way to work I've been noticing some clear cutting going on at
the top of the hill in Boring. I ventured up to see if it was
launchable, and it turns out the land owner is a guy I used to go to
school with. It faces SW and is an easy glide to the grade school
which has 3 HUGE fields to land in. HOWEVER, there is a few trees that
are a little taller than they need to be and need to be topped and
possibly removed. The land owner agreed to letting us have our way
with the location (Fly-ins, tandems, tree topping, landscaping etc)
for a small annual fee, not yet negotiated. (figuring around 4-500$ a
year, which a Fly-in at that site could easily pay for) I haven't
talked with the school yet, but it just so happens to be the grade
school I went to as a child, and my son went to as well, so I already
know the staff and don't think they will care. I'm sure the ground
rules will be the same as Eagle Caves, but nothings set in stone YET.
So the launch is at 990' and the LZ is 538' with a distance as the
crow flies of .52mi. with a glider at 1:6 glide it should be just
right, but if there isint there are possible bail outs. Of course were
going to have to get permission first I haven't talked to any of them
yet. So the math goes...  990'(launch)-535'(LZ)=455' Vertical,
Distance of .52mi=2746', glider with 1:6 glide ratio equates
2746'/6'=458' total drop in glide. We need to clean up branches and
top a couple trees at least to fly there so we're gonna need some
volunteers to help. I know some tree service friends and will talk to
them to see if anything could be worked out cheap. And make sure
things are chill with the grade school. This could be a really great
thermic site close to home.Any takers on volunteering call me at
503-481-7351. I'm going to arrange a day to go up and test Maybe top
some trees early next week around Tuesday and also talk with bail out
land owners for permission. A sleeved out dude like myself might not
be the best candidate for that so if anyone would like to use their
special social skills feel free haha.

Rich Moren
503-481-7351

20120809_114949.jpg
20120809_115009.jpg
20120809_115349.jpg
20120809_115435.jpg
boring earth.jpg
boring launch.jpg
20120809_115606.jpg
20120809_114959.jpg
20120809_115528.jpg

These pictures were sent with Picasa, from Google.
Try it out here: http://picasa.google.com/

20120809_114949.jpg 69K Download

20120809_115009.jpg 73K Download

20120809_115349.jpg 63K Download

20120809_115435.jpg 62K Download

boring earth.jpg 51K Download

boring launch.jpg 53K Download

20120809_115606.jpg 23K Download

20120809_114959.jpg 80K Download

20120809_115528.jpg 108K Download

Glen, the launch faces SW I held a compass there and at the time was over
the back. There are 3 possible bail outs. Nothings set in stone so don't go
there yet =) The land owner is real willing to work with us just be
patient. The power lines below are way below Kinda like oceansides trees
out front.

ok I see what you're saying Glen I'm gonna drive back out there and double
check. cause I was relying on the compass in my phone and google earth says
its NE launch.

Just being the devil's advocate... but I'd like to go check it out
myself at some point.

Alan

On Aug 10, 2:25 pm, Richard Moren <rmore...@gmail.com> wrote:

  How did money come up with a non flown (marginal looks shallow and
broken up on google earth) micro-site without a secured lz? Once money
changes hand it definitely needs to be an insured site. It is always
better to try and do a flight to check it out and hopefully get the land
owner enthused about our sport. Appears to be east facing site?  I have
a topo view and a google earth view from 100' over the school. It
appears to be a bit shallow for a small site and broken up though the
ridge appears more consistent further north? I have plenty of doubts but
that said I would try it, no doubt I have flown crazier places

As one who has flown micro-sites all over western WA and OR they can be
extremely tricky. It is one thing to fly a small site on the water front
with a nice laminar flow but often micro-sites have lots of turbulence
unless it is on a larger ridge which helps clean up/ organize air flow.
I have one little site Jim Wagner and I named TPD turbulent pit of
death. Ridge soaring a small site is tough climbing out in a thermal
even tougher. Gobblers was only 300' but very steep, totally clearcut,
had a grass seed field above and below and was up on a bigger ridge.
Even with that it was a crap shoot on lighter days. Gobblers is closed
as the woman who owns launch and property north of the lz does not want
us cutting and it is grown over.

On 8/10/2012 2:25 PM, Richard Moren wrote:

Boring.JPG 201K Download

Boring view from lz.JPG 468K Download

Gobblers.JPG 378K Download

Gobblers topo.JPG 271K Download

A key factor is not so much the glide ratio to the landing area, but the steepness of the slope in front of launch.
Moren's Boring has a 33% grade, which is a lot better than the 17% grade to the LZ.
However, it's a lot shallower than most of our sites.  Chehalem is shallower than Cliffside and has a 45% grade near launch.
So the indications aren't great, but I'd take a look at it...

Boring_1.png 138K Download