In the latest version of the beta package, the CRM 2011 On-Premise, but not Federated, authentication type was removed from the list.
Am I missing something or is that the way it's going to be going forward? It lets me set up the connection to the 4.0 Premise location, but doesn't let me do anything with destinations throwing a COM error.
The On-Premise option is available in the CRM 4.0 edition as you have discovered. It was never included in the CRM 2011 edition to begin with. We have decided CRM 2011 is not that important for customers running CRM on-premises. However if you are able to provide a proof there is a need for this option in On-Premise deployment, we may reconsider.
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:54:51 PM UTC-4, Adam David Pinilla wrote:
> In the latest version of the beta package, the CRM 2011 On-Premise, but > not Federated, authentication type was removed from the list.
> Am I missing something or is that the way it's going to be going forward? > It lets me set up the connection to the 4.0 Premise location, but doesn't > let me do anything with destinations throwing a COM error.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Ivan Peev <ivan.p...@cozyroc.com> wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> The On-Premise option is available in the CRM 4.0 edition as you have
> discovered. It was never included in the CRM 2011 edition to begin with. We
> have decided CRM 2011 is not that important for customers running CRM
> on-premises. However if you are able to provide a proof there is a need for
> this option in On-Premise deployment, we may reconsider.
> Regards,
> Ivan
> On Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:54:51 PM UTC-4, Adam David Pinilla wrote:
>> In the latest version of the beta package, the CRM 2011 On-Premise, but
>> not Federated, authentication type was removed from the list.
>> Am I missing something or is that the way it's going to be going forward?
>> It lets me set up the connection to the 4.0 Premise location, but doesn't
>> let me do anything with destinations throwing a COM error.
>> Thanks!
>> Adam
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "COZYROC" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cozyroc@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> cozyroc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/cozyroc/-/K9mu0ywUQhIJ.
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 1:08:16 PM UTC-4, Adam David Pinilla wrote:
> Oh, I didn't realize it wasn't there in 2011 at all on my other testing > box. Never mind then!
> We're pushing into Federated logins anyway, so I can just wait until I set > that up.
> Thanks.
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Ivan Peev <ivan...@cozyroc.com<javascript:> > > wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>> The On-Premise option is available in the CRM 4.0 edition as you have >> discovered. It was never included in the CRM 2011 edition to begin with. We >> have decided CRM 2011 is not that important for customers running CRM >> on-premises. However if you are able to provide a proof there is a need for >> this option in On-Premise deployment, we may reconsider.
>> Regards, >> Ivan
>> On Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:54:51 PM UTC-4, Adam David Pinilla wrote:
>>> In the latest version of the beta package, the CRM 2011 On-Premise, but >>> not Federated, authentication type was removed from the list.
>>> Am I missing something or is that the way it's going to be going >>> forward? It lets me set up the connection to the 4.0 Premise location, but >>> doesn't let me do anything with destinations throwing a COM error.
>>> Thanks!
>>> Adam
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "COZYROC" group. >> To post to this group, send email to coz...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> cozyroc+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/cozyroc/-/K9mu0ywUQhIJ.
