Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Question about cowtacular infrastructure
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Alainsane  
View profile  
 More options May 19 2011, 12:50 pm
From: Alainsane <alan.angerba...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 19 2011 12:50 pm
Subject: Question about cowtacular infrastructure
Hi.

I work with someone who (I think) worked with you back East.  He
really likes your cowtacular system, and I have a far lesser helpdesk
built once in php/mysql and twice (for primary use) in ColdFusion/
oracle, so I thought I'd take a peek at this.

I was wondering why you ended up going with sqlite instead of mysql.
I don't have experience with the former, so I'm not asking
rhetorically.

If I was unable to convince our local Web admins to install the
necessary sqlite modules, would it be impossible to make it work with
mysql?  Just curious.  :-)

Cheers.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris VanHorn  
View profile  
 More options May 19 2011, 1:56 pm
From: Chris VanHorn <happi...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 19 2011 1:56 pm
Subject: Re: Question about cowtacular infrastructure
Hi,

Originally, I had developed Cowtacular to work with MySQL, Oracle and
SQLite.  But I found that maintaining (primarily testing) support
across those different database platforms was a bit a of work that I
didn't have the time to do.

I ended up picking SQLite because:

1. It is not strongly typed like PHP and thus a better match.
2. Helpdesk databases rarely get all that large.  Ours has 8+ years of
data (Over 50,000 tickets) in it and is still under 100MB in size.
3. Backups are easier.  I have found in the past that many people do
not know how to properly backup a database that is hosted on something
such as MySQL, ORACLE, etc.  SQLite database files can be backed up
just like any other file on your server.
4. It is easier to get up and running, especially for people who are
not too familiar with database management.
5. There are fewer moving parts so to speak.  With other database
systems, you have to make sure the database service is up and running
and the database is online.  SQlite makes troubleshooting easier.

On the MySQL note, it would not be terribly difficult to adjust it to
work with MySQL.  99% of all database interactions are performed
within global/lib.php file.  If you were to adjust them to perform
MySQL calls instead, it should work for the most part.

I hope that helps answer your questions.  I am working on a pre-
packaged version of Cowtacular in a VMWare virtual machine, but it's
not ready for the masses yet.

- Chris

On May 19, 12:50 pm, Alainsane <alan.angerba...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alainsane  
View profile  
 More options May 19 2011, 3:35 pm
From: Alainsane <alan.angerba...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 19 2011 3:35 pm
Subject: Re: Question about cowtacular infrastructure
Thank you for the reply.  I can definitely see how management could be
easier: writing to .db files (that could be) stored in the same
general location as the app...instead of communicating across ODBC
connections to tables/databases/dataspaces/servers over which someone
else has ultimate control.  Cheers!

On May 19, 10:56 am, Chris VanHorn <happi...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions Older topic »