The research indicates corporate knowledge workers rank the top needs as follows:
I've got a professional community and a network of co-workers.
I've got a professional community and a network of co-workers.BINGO! YOU have that. But there's a LOT of people who don't have this, regardless of their age. And that population is growing, again, regardless of age.Facilities rentals isn't going anywhere. Coworking is less about where we work and more about how we work, and who we work with.Here's the reality: coworking isn't replacing anything. It's giving people who never would have considered the pre-existing options a new choice, and it's one that they love.-AlexOn Tuesday, October 9, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Makes perfect sense to me - then again, I'm 58 years old. I've got aprofessional community and a network of co-workers. When I look torenting space, it's not about the people, it's about the facilities -and maybe about whether it's convenient for meetings among my existingnetwork.Jerome Chang wrote:
And very interesting: they say these grown-ups prioritized communitylast.JeromeOn Oct 9, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Steve King <sk...@emergentresearch.com
"I simply can't see that it would be very likely to find a relevant group of people in a co-working facility - everyone has their own project/agenda."
Miles- I know everyone brings a different viewpoint and needs to coworking spaces, but I can't possibly disagree (respectfully) with this more.
Would I go to a coworking community to recruit potential team members for my new company? Not likely. But not because there aren't awesome people there who could fit the bill, but because it's not a talent/temp agency; it's a place where people go to work together. I don't go to a coworking space (or own one) because I think it's a good way to find my next employees, I go there because it's the place where I can make my ideas a reality... with other people. Is it possible that after working with people at a coworking community I could find someone there that I'd like to hire or start a company with, absolutely, and I have seen it multiple times in my own space. But the reason for being there is different: go seeking talent for your work vs. go to work amongst other talent.
All that said, some of the most relevant, dynamic, driven, AND collaborative people I have ever met HAVE been in coworking spaces. The "co" in these spaces is built on the fact that they are working on their own things BUT ALSO plugged into the things others are working on, sometimes even to the point of putting themselves on the line to help them be successful. If not, then it is not a community (inherent with relationships, trust, shared meaning, and a focus on progress) but a space (a place where people can gather). You can find similar "spaces" anywhere... coffee shops, stadiums, or subways. But communities are different. Those who gather there invest in each other, through relationships, time, and sharing of themselves.
I know I can't speak to the experience you have had at whatever coworking spaces you have interacted with, so please don't take this as criticism. I just think there is more to coworking than you are giving credit by painting with such a broad brush.
Thanks & God Bless,
Joel Bennett
Chief Dreamchaser
Veel Hoeden
Cost isn't anywhere on the list. Should we say cost doesn't matter as much as any of those other items on the list to choosing a work space?
I went to the article Steve referenced, and almost the last sentence states, “Interestingly, according to secondary research, independent creative class workers also consistently named the same needs, but ranked their importance in almost the exact opposite order.” So according to the article, their research showed the difference in priorities depends to a large degree on whether you are a corporate worker or an “Independent, creative” worker.
As others have pointed out already, corporate workers do already have a substantial professional network built in, and so the physical space is what they are paying attention to. I have found it interesting to consider whether your priorities may differ depending in part on where you are in your career or your age, which is what Miles was saying.
If you stay in the same location and keep the same job all your life, then I suppose it is true that you build up a network that you use and benefit from, and so you might not prioritise meeting new people in your workplace. I guess that is the typical corporate career path, or if you stay in the same industry or type of job. All of which supports the first list of priorities, in which community comes up last. But if you do change careers and or locations, then the network you have may be less useful, or certainly you need to build up a new one as well, in which case the physical space you work in might seem less important than the new connections you want to make. And no matter what your career is, if you are the kind of person who thrives on meeting people who are completely out of your range of experience, then the place with connections will be more important.
So personally, I don’t think it is about whether you are a “corporate” or “independent, creative”, or whether you are older, or in any particular stage of your career, it is about your needs as a worker and a person, and what options you have for choosing your workspace to meet those needs. For me the rise of coworking spaces in all their diversity is what is fantastic, and that there are more and more choices, no matter what your needs are. No one type of space is better than another, if there are people for whom the space works. And if you move somewhere where there isn’t the type of working space you need, then there are communities of people to help you get started building what you want. :)
Oh, I am over 50, have worked for small start-ups, corporations, mid-size national companies, government agencies, and NGOs all in the same industry. I recently moved from the US with my lifetime of contacts and industry knowledge to England, where I know very few people. For me, it is all about community building, and creating a new network. But then, it always has been, and it always will be.
--