I saw that back in r110-112 timeframe that mcc.l was present - it
looked like an ideal way to add simplistic McCabe'ish' Cyclomatic
Complexity.
I'm a big believer in the dual axes of method complexity and coverage
reporting.
Was there something flawed in the approach you were pursuing or just a
bandwidth/feature prioritization cut?
Thanks in advance.
No flaw in the approach, just a bandwidth/feature cut. We weren't
happy with the UI for it. I was considering (at some point) basically
duping the CoverStory UI and creating a separate app for showing
complexity.
Cheers,
Dave