|
Contents
1.1 Striking Ford workers told to return to work
1.2 Dispute with landlord affects Education staff
1.3 Ceppwawu backs Mboweni for Nampak
2.1 Vavi: We'll leave the muck to Julius
2.2 SACP 'sorry' for booing Malema
2.3 Clash looms over Eskom's secret deals
2.5 Scandal surrounds top ANC man's arrest
2.6 Policy debate to hot up in next few years
2.7 ANC YL Refuses to Accept Farm Attack Memo
2.8 ANC is using Malema to divert attention
1. Workers1.1 Striking Ford workers told to return to work
TIMESLIVE, 12 March 2010Striking Ford workers were told to go back to work at the Silverton plant after the National Union of Metalworkers of SA said they had resolved the issues that led to a work stoppage.They downed tools at the assembly plant on Thursday, March 4, but a meeting led by general secretary Irvin Jim and president Cedric Gina with management resolved the issues on Thursday. "As Numsa we call on all our members at Ford Motor Company in Silverton to resume duty as follows: The first set of the workforce, the [Customer Service Operation], will resume duty on Friday, 12 March 2010 in accordance with their respective shift operations." "The rest of the workforce (assembly operations and supporting areas) will resume duty on Monday, 15 March 2010." Bargaining head Alex Mashilo said the work stoppage was related to the reduced hours of work as the automotive industry reels from the global economic crisis. The company had reduced working hours in terms of an agreement in the automotive sector national bargaining forum, which was struck before the crisis set in. This meant that in the week of February 22 to 27, they did not receive any pay. The unions are also trying to revisit the terms of that agreement, as well as get workers into the government's training lay-off scheme, which reskills workers instead of retrenching them when there is not enough work.
1.3 Ceppwawu backs Mboweni for NampakCitizen, 12 March 2010
JOHANNESBURG - Former SA Reserve Bank governor Tito Mboweni will play a significant role in driving Nampak’s new strategic plan, the Chemical, Energy, Paper, Printing, Wood and Allied Workers’ Union (Ceppwawu) said on Thursday. The plan would create new jobs and save old ones, the Ceppwawu secretariat said in a statement. Ceppwawu voiced its support for Mboweni’s appointment as chairman of Nampak from June 1, and said it looked forward to working with him. It nonetheless emphasised that it would continue to defend workers’ rights and would not hesitate to take to the streets against him “if we feel that the interests of the workers are being undermined”. Mboweni replaces Nampak non-executive chairman Trevor Evans. The National Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa) also welcomed Mboweni’s appointment, shortly after the decision was made last month. It hoped he would see reflected in the Nampak workforce the “brutality” of the conservative and neo-liberal policies he advanced at the SA Reserve Bank (SARB). His appointment should be about “cleansing himself by transformation and better conditions of employment for workers at Nampak”. Observing that the company’s executive was dominated by whites, Numsa said the status and admiration Mboweni earned as labour minister should guide him in pushing for transformation as opposed to being a “political hock for white capital to accumulate and expand their profits interests”. Mboweni served as South Africa’s labour minister from 1994 to 1998 before heading SARB. Since the end of his term, he has also been appointed as the chairman of AngloGold Ashanti, succeeding Russell Edey. This appointment also takes effect on June 1. The ANC Youth League has slammed the move as a reward for Mboweni’s protection of the interests of “male white capital”.
2.2 SACP 'sorry' for booing Malema |
|||||
|
By Carien du Plessis, IOL, 12 March 2010
|
||||
Stakes
in the looming clash between Eskom and the government on one hand and the
combined labour movement and community groups on the other were raised this
week with the confirmation of secret cut-price power deals for high-level
industrial consumers.
Last week the parliamentary portfolio committee on public enterprises heard
from Eskom that it had confidential "special price agreements" with
138 companies.
On Tuesday it became obvious at an energy portfolio committee hearing, that
this situation had been accepted by the government; that it was considered a
"contractual arrangement between Eskom and the companies involved".
Above all, the financial consequences of these deals were not taken into
account when the National Energy Regulatory of SA (Nersa) granted a three-year
consumer tariff hike to Eskom.
Hearing this news, Cosatu expressed "shock and disgust". The
federation promptly announced that it was "more determined than ever to
mobilise its members and the broader civil society on to the streets in
protest".
This, in fact, is now the view of the labour movement as a whole. Even before
the news of the special deals became public, the three federations represented
at the Nedlac negotiating forum had agreed to give notice of general strike
action in protest at Nersa's near 25 percent electricity tariff increase for
this year.
The federations still plan to table a notice of action under section 77 of the
Labour Relations Act. This permits unions to serve notice of intended
"protest action to promote or defend socioeconomic interests of
workers".
Once the arguments have been put at Nedlac and if no agreement can be reached,
the unions may give 14 days' notice of protest action.
Before the latest revelations, several union leaders expressed a hope that the
government would "see sense". The diplomatic response from these
leaders was that the government and Eskom would back down rather than face what
even then seemed likely to be very large-scale popular protest.
This attitude was summed up by Federation of Unions of SA general secretary
Dennis George. He noted: "We have to work together. In the talks after we
table our section 77 notice, we would hope to reach a reasonable
agreement."
That hope was all but completely dashed this week. "It all seems to have
the makings of the poll tax revolt," a former UK unionist noted, referring
to the broad-based mass demonstrations that brought an end to a punitive
housing tax in the UK in 1989.
There is considerable justification for this assessment because both the
government and Eskom will find it almost impossible to increase to any great
degree - if at all - the cut-price tariffs charged to the major power users.
For example, the reason that the three regional aluminium smelters, Hillside
and Bayside in KwaZulu-Natal and Mozal in southern Mozambique, were established
there was because of guaranteed cheap electricity from Eskom.
All three smelters have contracts that would be extremely costly to break. But
such contractual niceties are unlikely to quiet the anger and determination of
communities and unions, especially since these three entities use more
electricity than is generated by an average power station; Hillside at Richards
Bay and Mozal, south of Maputo, alone, consume 2 150 megawatts between them.
The fact that the three smelters are owned by BHP Billiton has also opened a
number of old wounds. In its modern form, the world's largest minerals company
had its origins in what has been dubbed AEE (Afrikaner economic empowerment),
an enrichment policy that long preceded its post-1994 black economic
empowerment counterpart.
It has long been a sore point among sections of the labour movement that the
AEE mining vehicle, Gencor "took the gap" at the time of transition
in 1994 and bought the UK-based Billiton, into which Gencor's main assets were
subsequently reversed before Gencor finally disappeared.
At the time of the Billiton purchase from Royal Dutch Shell, a former Gencor
executive chairman, Derek Keys, was finance minister in the new government. He
had served in the same role in the previous, apartheid, government from 1992,
stepping from Gencor into cabinet.
As a local magazine noted of the Gencor directors after the transfer of assets
was completed in 1997: "They've installed a miracle machine: you put rand
assets in the South African end and take tax-free pounds and dollars out
offshore!"
The fact that Keys resigned as finance minister in 1995 and then reportedly
headed for the tax haven island of Jersey as a Billiton director still rankles
in many quarters. Fingers continue to be pointed at Keys and at then Reserve
Bank governor Chris Stals.
But the energy deals struck with the Billiton smelters, and apparently with the
power-guzzling steel mills now owned by ArcelorMittal, are not of the apartheid
era. Or, even if deals, perhaps with the steel industry or Sasol, were struck
during that era, the takeover ownership changes should have resulted in
renegotiations of any existing energy agreements.
According to Eskom, 10 of the 138 beneficiaries of discounted power have energy
contracts dating from before 1994. Most of the deals must, therefore, have been
agreed by the post-1994 government, many of whose senior members continue to
serve in the present regime.
This, coupled with President Jacob Zuma's pro-business pronouncements during
his recent UK state visit, should ensure that the cabinet will resist demands
that details of the deals be made public. Yet, as the clamour for transparency
grows, so will tensions both within and outside the governing alliance.
However, mere disclosure will not suffice. The demand is also for the removal
of the tariff increases and Cosatu's call to "tax the rich" for
additional funding for Eskom is already gaining greater currency.
Myrtle Witbooi, the general secretary of the SA Domestic Service and Allied
Workers' Union, sums the mood: "The poor have paid enough. This is the
last straw and we must take action."
|
2.4 ANC chief's fat-cat dealsBy Wendy Jasson da Costa, IOL, 12 March 2010
|
Cape Town - A
confrontation is looming between authorities in Cape Town because Saps
officials didn't want to arrest Jackson Mthembu for drunk driving "because
he's high up in the ANC" after metro police apprehended him.
The Cape Town metro council has asked Western Cape MEC for safety and security,
Lennit Max, to investigate the fact that police initially refused to arrest
Mthembu.
Allegedly case numbers were also tampered with, and metro police officials were
threatened with arrest by the Saps.
The police did not want to comment and merely confirmed the arrest of Mthembu,
chief spokesperson for the ANC and member of the national executive committee.
Turbulent week
The arrest took place in a turbulent week for the ANC, during which Winnie
Madikizela-Mandela lashed out at the party and former president Nelson Mandela,
ANC youth league leader Julius Malema sang a controversial song, and Brian
Sokutu, a spokesperson, was suspended.
Gwede Mantashe, secretary-general of the ANC, who also had to lead a crisis
meeting between the ANC and the SACP on Thursday, said they will not be taking
steps against Mthembu at this stage.
"Let's first hear his side of the story. Crucifying him now won't do
anybody any good."
According to J P Smith, mayoral committee member for safety and security,
Mthembu was pulled off the N2 inbound to Cape Town at 07:50 on Thursday.
Metro police officials became suspicious when they smelt his breath. He was
taken to the city's new Safely Home Anti Drunk Driving Operations War Room
(Shadow) in Athlone, where his blood alcohol level was tested.
His blood alcohol level was 0.87mg per 100 millilitre - almost four times the
legal limit of 0.24mg per millilitre.
Test recorded
The Shadow centre is technologically highly advanced and the entire process was
recorded, should any accusations concerning the procedures arise later, said
Smith.
Mthembu was taken from the centre to the Mowbray police station.
The trouble started when the Saps threatened to arrest the metro police
officials who wanted to have Mthembu arrested.
Metro police management eventually asked the Saps station commander to make
sure a docket is opened for Mthembu.
According to Smith, however, the Saps case numbers were tampered with and the
metro police had to correct them.
"It is extremely worrying because it appears the police didn't want to
arrest Mthembu simply because he's a high-level ANC official. It was only once
the station commander's co-operation was requested that the process could be
completed," said Smith.
Mthembu was released on R500 bail and will appear in the Wynberg Magistrate's
Court on March 24 on a charge of drunk driving.
In whose lifetime will the nationalisation of mines happen? The fact that you are an avid reader of this column suggests that Father Time will harvest you long before the African national Congress (ANC) Youth League turns its threats of nationalisation into government policy. If you are a reader of this august publication and are as young as the young lions of the ANC, do not make the mistake of thinking you will reap some policy advantage from your age.
Unlike the markets, I am not easily intimidated. I have no doubt that one has to be reincarnated an infinite number of times before one can taste the fruit of nationalisation. If I am correct, why are we even having this debate?
The answer lies in the fact that the next three years will
deliver three significant policy milestones.
In September this year, the ANC is holding its national general council (NGC).
The NGC is a midterm conference of the ruling party, the task of which is to
review policy and the performance of government since the last election. In
case you have forgotten, the last NGC was held in June 2005, and key policy
proposals were rejected as part of a broader rebellion against Thabo Mbeki,
given the fact that he had axed Jacob Zuma as Deputy President of the country a
few days earlier. This year’s NGC is important because it will signal
possible policy changes. Further, it is an opportunity for those who seek to
shift policy away from the centre to win the policy battles they lost in the
past. The NGC will also give us an idea of the extent to which Zuma is still in
control of the ruling party. Also, we will be able to assess whether he has
enough support to remain a frontrunner in the 2012 battle for the presidency of
the ANC.
The second milestone is the 2011 national policy conference of the ANC, where the policy framework for the period 2014 to 2019 will be crafted. This policy framework will be endorsed at the national conference of the ruling party in December 2012, and this constitutes the third milestone in the policy agenda. This third policy milestone is of special significance because the ANC celebrates 100 years of its existence in 2012 and the country will, in 2014, celebrate 20 years of democracy.
Current debates about the nationalisation of mines and the South African Reserve Bank must be understood in terms of these three milestones.
However, these milestones are not only of significance in policy terms since they are also about the consolidation of the political gains that were made in Polokwane. They will, therefore, give us indications of how the balance of power and support may be reconfigured in the months leading up to the 2012 conference of the ANC. As matters stand at the moment, Zuma’s position is not as secure as it was a year ago. Policy contradictions between his administration and his left-wing allies in the tripartite alliance are beginning to sharpen. The content of both the State of the Nation address and the Budget speech showed very clearly that it would take a huge effort on the part of the South African Communist Party (SACP) and the Congress of South African Trade Unuions (Cosatu) to move ANC policy left of centre.
The left-wing rhetoric of these speeches was not matched in any way by what Cosatu and the SACP regard as left-wing policy measures. In fact, the Budget speech succeeded in promising a new way of doing things in the post- recession economic and political setting by maintaining old and trusted policy remedies.
It would be remiss of me not to state that the Minister of Finance, Pravin Gordhan, in response to arguments about the deficit between rhetoric and actual policy, indicated that the Budget was propoor to the extent that the spending momentum on items such as education and health was being maintained.
But, if these allocations are indicators of propoorness, then propoor Budgets have been with us since 1994. In fact, the content of our Budgets has, since the advent of democracy, been pro-poor but the outcomes have been preponderantly antipoor. So the President must focus on both outcomes and Budget allocations if he is serious about an ‘outcomes-based’ approach to governance.
In other words, the ANC government must work towards a proper alignment between Budget allocations and outcomes. This is what the policy debate should be about over the next three years. And it should be about the nature of the constraints that will be imposed on the State by the fact that the new instruments that Zuma has created will, for some time, be unable to deliver optimally since they will be creating internal capacity for themselves.
Johannesburg — The ANC youth league has refused to accept a list detailing 1600 farm murders from a delegation representing Afriforum on Thursday afternoon.
Afriforum youth leader Ernst Roets and several other members of the organisation wanted to deliver the list as a response to ANCYL president Julius Malema's alleged singing "Kill the Farmers! They are rapists!" in Zulu at the University of Johannesburg earlier this week.
Roets and his colleagues were asked by ANC officials to leave Luthuli House after the delegation began to address the media once the Youth League refused to accept the memo.
Speaking to Business Day from the equality court where he was filing a complaint against Malema, Roets called for the banning of the song.
"This song incites the killing of white people and as such we are wanting to see it be classified as hate speech. Julius Malema must apologise," Roets said.
Shivambu says the league has no problem with discussing issues of human rights with Afriforum but questioned their legitimacy in doing so.
In media reports, the ANCYL has called for the song to be seen as a political tune that doesn't incite violence.
In 2006 the SA Human Rights Commission declared the song sung by late ANC Youth Leage leader Peter Mokaba "Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer" hate speech which is banned by the Constitution and is a crime.
And League spokesperson ANCYL spokesperson Floyd Shivambu in an interview with Business Day denied refusing to accept the list.
He says the delegates didn't have an appointment.
"Don't say you want to talk about human rights and you are only here to protect white farmer's rights. It's their grandfather's that killed thousands of our people"
|
2.8 ANC is using Malema to divert attention
By Ainsley Daniels, 11 March 2010
|