That's what I thought - the patch I wrote was just meant to be more
Stephen E. Baker
P.S. When map sizes become variable we'll have to ensure they stay <=
On 02/05/2012 7:13 AM, Edvin Linge wrote:
> I actually have no idea why it is smaller in that function. Looking at
> -----Original Message----- From: Stephen E. Baker
> I wrote a patch that resolves issue 1236, however I wonder if it was
> So my question is, was it defaulted to 20 on purpose (e.g. for
> Either way, my patch is safe and has been tested, assuming room sizes
> Stephen E. Baker
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.