Challenging Atty Gen Blumenthal

[Mort Zuckerman]

To: zerh...@od.nih.gov, Spin...@yahoogroups.com,
kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com, patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, harol...@yale.edu,
james.p...@yale.edu

Subject: Re: Challenging Atty Gen Blumethal

Date: Sep 19, 2008 11:23 AM

No, but if you had kids, they would be taken away.
DCF is his hit squad.

And we Lymies are not completely furious with Dick, despite the fact
that he should insist legislation be passed that allows the DCF
"courts"
to be open - and the parents be given the privileges given to regular
criminal defendents - and their wiretapping operation shut down.

It does not make any sense for Dicks DCF tards to be running
roughshod over Lyme victims and stealing his mail, and Dick
saying absolutely nothing about this federal offense:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BLUMENTHALS_MAIL_STOLEN_BY_JESSICA_GAUVIN.htm

As I have said before, nobody really knows Dick Blumenthal.
I would not attack him in this way, therefore.

If our main argument is that people should be given the benefit of
the doubt- the crux of our formal legal system- innocent until
proven guilty, then we, as activists, cannot have double standards.

Hypocrisy has to end with the people.

Since these gubbamint tards don't know what decency is, they can
learn by example- our GLOBAL example:
http://www.actionlyme.org/JOINT_CHIEFS.htm

As you have no small children who can be kidnapped and tortured
like the Inkels, you are not in danger, is my guess:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm

Recall that Phil Inkel probably could get no help from the New
London Police as regards the torture of his children by that insane
Annette Anderson, because he previously won a big police brutality
lawsuit against the State Troopers.

http://www.actionlyme.org/VIKING_INTERVIEWS.htm

They ordered Phil killed for $10,000 as you recall.
http://www.actionlyme.org/1994_Murzin_Ch8_snip.wmv

Then they beat the crap out of the Murzin boys for reporting
Phil's beating for trying to stop the beating of the teenager
in McDonald's parking lot in Colchester.

That's how this State works. The effing State employees
never hang it up. They get you one way or another, and Blumenthal's
gang is duh DCF.

If I were to attack Blumenthal it would be over the fact that his
kidnapping tards are in possession of a ton of information that
proves that all psychotropics are brain damaging.
http://www.actionlyme.org/BUNNEY_YALE_BRAIN_DAMAGE.htm

'Seems funny to be screaming about being a protector of children
when the kidnapped kids are all turning out demented and insane and
eventually in the prisons because of it:
http://www.actionlyme.org/080709.htm

Illogical.


Kathleen M. Dickson