Chertoff and the 1993 WTC bombing case

[Mort Zuckerman]

To: bpc...@norwichdiocese.net, scientifi...@ostp.gov,
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com,
bob.d...@latimes.com

Subject: Chertoff and the 1993 WTC bombing case

Date: Jun 13, 2009 9:21 AM

ARTICLE BELOW
=========================================

It was Chertoff who told Fitz how to
run that 1993 case and buried the network.
'The network that later assisted with the
9/11 stunt.

The network would be the same network
uncovered by Sibel Edmonds. Cheney's and
Rockefeller's CIA and the Neocons. You know,
like Oliver North and the Iranian/Sandanista
gun-runners. The arms and money changed
hands through Israel.

This would also explain Chertoff's particular
prosecutorial interest in Muslim money in
America. He knew how the networks - funding
and supplying "terrorists" - worked. (So did
the Bushies with their Riggs Bank CIA Spook Bank.)

Al Quaeda happens to be a deliberate, puppet
"terrorist" organization set up for the purpose
of having a "target" right where the oil and
minerals wealth is.


See, ya gotta reframe Iran-Contra in today's
terms: The CIA needs to be performing skits
in order to keep their goons loyal. There needs
to be enemies. Today's enemies are the same as
they have ever been since the 1950s:
Whoever Has Stuff Americans Want. Earlier, in the
name of Anti-Nuclear Russia, and now in the name of
Anti-Russia (Caspian wealth) disguised as Muslim
terrorists or Nuclear Iranians. Hence, the procedure
is always to create a fake threat or cause.

I would not blame Fitz. He was working for
Chertoff at the time. The Israelis think they're
helping us steal all the Middle Eastern Mineral
and Oil Wealth. If Israelis perform skits in the
Middle East, the US will arm Israel. If the Israelis
perform skits in America, America will land some
humongous bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. And the
Neocons are right there dealin with the Turks for
a personal piece of the pipeline action.


*GET* the globalizing:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BUSH_BIN_LADEN.htm
"Since 1993, in India, Enron had invested $ 2.9 billion for a power
plant near Bombay. Originally it had counted on cheap supply of gas
from Turkmenistan via the planned pipeline through Afghanistan. The
power plant project had turned into a nightmare."

The US Petrodollar Banksters and the Israelicons
intended to, LITERALLY, now, run the world.


Everyone needs to ignore this "terrorists" and
"weapons" crap. It's total crap. A charade.
A live cartoon. Everyone knew in the 1970s
that we were running out of oil.

How, then, did we have the roaring 80s and 90s?

It was one big lying glut-bloat meant to
force the current crisis, the current tipping
point, where we hysterically just steal the
damned Arab oil, as planned by Kissinger in 1973.


Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org

====================================
http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/06/12/fitzgerald-trying-to-censor-explosive-911-tale/
Author: Fitzgerald libel threat aimed at censoring key 9/11 tale


Share on Facebook

By Stephen C. Webster

Published: June 12, 2009
Updated 10 hours ago



Powerful prosecutor’s efforts to suppress book virtually guarantees
elevated sales

Peter Lance should be thanking Patrick Fitzgerald right now, even as
the attorney’s checks are being signed.

If it were not for the U.S. Attorney who famously prosecuted I. Lewis
“Scooter” Libby, the former Vice President’s Chief of Staff, the re-
release of Lance’s stunning tale of mishandled espionage leading up to
the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, might be overlooked.

The former ABC News investigative reporter’s book Triple Cross hit
relatively few shelves in 2006 as a hardcover and left retail quietly,
almost completely ignored. Now, with its paperback release looming,
U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald is threatening to sue over material
which he calls “defamatory” and “easily proven to be objectively
false,” some of which touches on little known information relating to
the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Because of the threat, the reissue of Triple Cross received attention
from The Washington Post, Huffington Post, The Wall Street Journal and
the Associated Press, among others.

“That’s the lesson of censorship,” chided Lance, speaking to RAW
STORY.

The dark plots of Ali Mohamed

Ali Mohamed, according to Lance, was something of an al Qaeda super-
spy who managed to work with terrorists, the Green Berets, the CIA and
become an FBI informant, even while ensuring Osama bin Laden’s safe
passage around the middle east. For years, Triple Cross alleges, the
FBI and specifically Fitzgerald, knew about him but allowed Mohamed’s
activities to continue unchecked.

Mohamed, Lance wrote, was actually responsible for writing portions of
the terror network’s training manual and played a key role in the
bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa which left over 200 dead.

“While some contend that Mohamed’s intimate relations with the FBI and
CIA are proof of government involvement in a 9/11 plot, Lance says
that it was instead embarrassment and ass-covering on the part of
Justice and Pentagon officials over the mishandling of Ali Mohammed
that led first to a conspiracy of silence and then to a conspiracy to
cover up their incompetence and deception,” noted author Rory O’Connor
in November, 2006. “He believes that chagrin over the fact that bin
Laden’s spy stole top-secret intelligence (including, for example, the
positions of all Green Beret and SEAL units worldwide) led to a
decision on high to bury the entire Able Danger intelligence program,
which identified the Al Qaeda cell active in Brooklyn months before
the 9/11 attacks, and also identified Ali Mohamed as a member of bin
Laden’s inner circle as early as March 2000.”

“In 1996, Fitzgerald and other top officials discredited a treasure
trove of al Qaeda-related evidence, including evidence of an active al
Qaeda cell operating in NYC five years before 9/11 and of a bin Laden
plot to hijack a plane to free Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman—intelligence
considered so important that it was later cited in the infamous
Presidential Daily Briefing given to George W. Bush just weeks before
9/11,” noted HarperCollins in a press release.

Mohamed is allegedly still alive today, though his whereabouts is
unknown.

‘Defamatory’

Fitzgerald, in one of several letters (PDF link) to the book’s
publisher, argued that a number of the allegations are “defamatory.”

“Allegations that a government attorney lied and concealed evidence
are defamatory per se because such allegations: impute that I have
engaged in criminal activity (making false statements, which is an
offense in itself and which constitutes perjury when contained in a
sworn affidavit; and obstruction of justice); impute that I lack
integrity in performing employment duties; and otherwise prejudices me
in my profession,” he wrote.

He further alleges that Lance’s statements are “actionable” in that
they were “published with actual malice.”

“It is outrageous to falsely accuse me of causing those deaths [on
9/11] corruptly,” Fitzgerald said. He has called on the publisher to
withdraw the book from stores and refrain from publishing the
paperback.

“Patrick Fitzgerald accuses me of making charges in the book that I
never made,” Lance told the Associated Press. “At the same time, he
continually fails to respond to the substantive allegations documented
in 604 pages, 1,425 end notes and 32 pages of documentary appendices.”

After the publisher’s attorneys vetted Lance’s text, which ultimately
suffered only incidental modification, Triple Cross ended up 26 pages
longer; the new material apparently detailing Fitzgerald’s attempt to
censor it and Lance’s specific rebuttals.

“What Patrick Fitzgerald tried to do is almost unprecedented,” Lance
told RAW STORY. “It’s amazing, really. Arguably the most powerful
prosecutor in America is trying to kill my book.”

“Triple Cross has become Patrick Fitzgerald’s obsession,” he commented
to Geoff Metcalf, writing for Accuracy in Media.

While declaring the book to be Fitzgerald’s “obsession” may be
presumptuous, it is certainly safe to predict that the paperback
release of Triple Cross will become the obsession of many more readers
than it would have if the U.S. Attorney had never attempted to censor
it.

The paperback is due in bookstores everywhere on June 16.

"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci