Impressionism Clone Brush

[Bill Rodgers]

On the one hand, a 'fix' for the 'broken' impressionist brush in PP9 was
never solved for Ruth (yet :-)....On the other hand, I for one, found some
really great new brush settings (to save), in the process.....That's what I
love about coming *here*...!!

Bill Rodgers

"Ruth Huking" <rhu...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:392F6244...@flash.net...
> This is no prize winner but I got it to work for me. It will never
> replace the Corel 7 Impressionism brush! Cricket, I used your
> instructions but modified them some. Thanks again to all of you for your
> help.
>
> Ruth
>
> --
> Ruth Huking
> Computer Artist
> http://www.flash.net/~rhuking/
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

[Cricket]

Ah. Very nice, Ruth. Where there's a will there's always some kind of way
<g> What I really like about the image is the variations of color in the
'flat' areas. This is something I have a lot of trouble with. I guess this
is what you've been looking to handle with the brushes.

Cricket
C_TECH Volunteer

[Cricket]

Me too! I've saved so many custom brushes that I can't decide what to use
when. <g>

Cricket
C_TECH Volunteer

"Bill Rodgers" <mrb...@email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:392f7330@cnews...

> On the one hand, a 'fix' for the 'broken' impressionist brush in PP9 was
> never solved for Ruth (yet :-)....On the other hand, I for one, found some
> really great new brush settings (to save), in the process.....That's what
I
> love about coming *here*...!!
>
> Bill Rodgers
>

[Bill Rodgers]

Cricket, I don't recall seeing the 'C_TECH Volunteer' attached under your
'nick' before. Is this new, or am I just slow? (Okay, okay, don't answer
that part!)......Congratulations anyhow....and thanks! (for all volunteers
helping us here.)

Bill Rodgers

"Cricket" <cri...@richmond.infi.net> wrote in message
news:392ff164@cnews...

[Debbie Cook [C_TECH]]

> Cricket, I don't recall seeing the 'C_TECH Volunteer' attached under your
> 'nick' before. Is this new, or am I just slow?

We've just suckered ... er ... welcomed her into the fray. ;-)

--
Debbie Cook
============================
http://www.cedesign.com/cefx

[Bill Rodgers]

Well...'Good on ya!!'.....How does one go about 'suckering' a 'Cricket'
anyway? (I know how to confuse a cat.)....I'd better stop... or the 'thread
police' will make go sit in the corner :-)

Bill Rodgers

"Debbie Cook [C_TECH]" <ct...@corel.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1399ceeff...@cnews.corel.com...

[Ruth Huking]

Cricket, that's right. I adjusted the numbers especially the Hue, Saturation and
Lightness. I made them 4-5 instead of 15. I also made the spread about 25. I had
the two screens as you suggested but I didn't have to use the Info Image Docker.
I used the new page as a palette and just changed the color there every time I
needed to change a color on the palette. The color was cloned from there. The
picture was very small, 2" x 3" and eventually I got both of them showing either
To Fit or 1 to 1. That's as far as I got last night!

Ruth

Cricket wrote:

> Ah. Very nice, Ruth. Where there's a will there's always some kind of way
> <g> What I really like about the image is the variations of color in the
> 'flat' areas. This is something I have a lot of trouble with. I guess this
> is what you've been looking to handle with the brushes.
>
> Cricket
> C_TECH Volunteer
>

[Cricket]

LOL to both of youse.

Now you'll be seeing even more of me! Bwa-ha-ha

Cricket
C_Tech Volunteer

"Bill Rodgers" <mrb...@email.msn.com> wrote in message

news:39300a0d@cnews...