On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:36:18 +1000
damien.w...@gmail.com wrote:Hi Damien,
> On 21 September 2012 11:07, Stuart Young <cef...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not a lawyer, and I know that Josef isn't either, but the wording of all
> > of section 3.2 does seem a bit worrying. I'm just hoping that it gets
> > clarified a bit to prove one way or another MakerBot's stance on
> > Thingiverse.
I'm not a lawyer either, but my reading of clause 3.2 is similar to
"solely for the purposes of including your User Content in the Site and
Services being defined as:
"service for users to share digital designs that can be printed on 3D
The uses that license covers them for include things like storing copies
The license they ask for is neither transferable to other parties nor
The worst thing I can see about the license is that it's
It could no doubt be better from our point of view, but
With some luck the smart minds at http://tos-dr.info/ (a great site!)
Anyhow, that's my uninformed 2c (sorry for such a un-hackery first post
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.