<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Computing Performance Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance</link>
  <description>An open forum dedicated to System and Network Computing performance with a particular focus on topics relating to native Linux/Unix systems, managed code, Java and Mono VMs, and TCP/IP Networks.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Guerrilla Capacity Planning</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/5e5bfdeaebf40c25/86b3127bc3d33fb2?show_docid=86b3127bc3d33fb2</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; The rather amusing and always useful Guerrilla Capacity Planning &lt;br&gt; has a home on the web at &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.perfdynamics.com/Manifesto/gcaprules.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; I noticed today the Universal Scalability Law references, pointing &lt;br&gt; to Gunther&#39;s upcoming book: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.perfdynamics.com/Manifesto/USLscalability.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/5e5bfdeaebf40c25/86b3127bc3d33fb2?show_docid=86b3127bc3d33fb2</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:44:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Troubleshoothing High Load</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/eed00429a51aa03b/6e79ca56c45666ce?show_docid=6e79ca56c45666ce</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; I just noticed an excellent tutorial by Kyle Rankin on &lt;br&gt; Troubleshooting High Load applicable to any *NIX system: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.linuxjournal.com/magazine/hack-and-linux-troubleshooting-part-i-high-load?page=0,0&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;A great primer for new sys-admin recruits :) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Best -Federico
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/eed00429a51aa03b/6e79ca56c45666ce?show_docid=6e79ca56c45666ce</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:03:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Nvidia Parallel Forall</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/951768c984f117be/72a25c10f408ccf3?show_docid=72a25c10f408ccf3</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; NVidia has a new developer blog titled, aptly enough, &amp;quot;Parallel &lt;br&gt; Forall&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://developer.nvidia.com/blog?term=2&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Some interesting tidbits on GPU performance in there. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Best -Federico
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/951768c984f117be/72a25c10f408ccf3?show_docid=72a25c10f408ccf3</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:01:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Fortran is faster than C</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/03facbbfc6cee6b6/52bc8d9cd7c06297?show_docid=52bc8d9cd7c06297</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; I have run into the issue of optimizing memory-copy operations in C &lt;br&gt; being interfered with by C&#39;s ability to have pointers to overlapping &lt;br&gt; memory areas at least twice in the past month, so I thought I&#39;d point &lt;br&gt; to this essay I was reading yesterday in NYC: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/articles/faster_than_C.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/03facbbfc6cee6b6/52bc8d9cd7c06297?show_docid=52bc8d9cd7c06297</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:43:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>64 bit benchmarks</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/657b28bf7e043434/46196d42b599e872?show_docid=46196d42b599e872</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; Ran into this deck recently, and although it is a bit dated, it has &lt;br&gt; nice benchmarks and micro-benchmarks comparing 32bit and 64bit x86 &lt;br&gt; architecture performance. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.amd64.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pub/64bit_Linux-Myths_and_Facts.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Slide 11 has a nice acknowledgement of SUSE&#39;s work on GCC enablement
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/657b28bf7e043434/46196d42b599e872?show_docid=46196d42b599e872</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:17:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Performance Tuning Dojo #1: vmtouch</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/4a1ac136ddac8efd/9078c0d32ad3ad5e?show_docid=9078c0d32ad3ad5e</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; I am happy to announce that I have joined Linux New Media as a &lt;br&gt; columnist for Admin Magazine in the Fall. &amp;quot;Performance Tuning Dojo&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; will appear in the coming issue of the magazine (those of you in &lt;br&gt; Europe already have access to it), and covers page loading behavior &lt;br&gt; and forcing (or better yet making consistent) page loading behavior
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/4a1ac136ddac8efd/9078c0d32ad3ad5e?show_docid=9078c0d32ad3ad5e</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 05:36:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Cloud I/O Benchmarks</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/81f6734cf9821fb1/68a0644ad87b2d0a?show_docid=68a0644ad87b2d0a</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; Another very nice piece of work from CloudHarmony: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.cloudharmony.com/2010/06/disk-io-benchmarking-in-cloud.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; excellent data comparisons on the performance of EBS block storage. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Best -F
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/81f6734cf9821fb1/68a0644ad87b2d0a?show_docid=68a0644ad87b2d0a</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:09:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re : TI Pandaboards improving at breakneck pace...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/9aeb051bb975bee6/29c0ca0bdb24597c?show_docid=29c0ca0bdb24597c</link>
  <description>
  We added our board to this test... &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1202157-BY-1201286BY42&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;. It was an &lt;br&gt; original Panda (EA3) with a similar hardfp build from the first week &lt;br&gt; of February. While some of the benchies are predictably 20% slower &lt;br&gt; than the ES, it is interesting to note that some actually performed
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/9aeb051bb975bee6/29c0ca0bdb24597c?show_docid=29c0ca0bdb24597c</guid>
  <author>
  kkevi...@mit.edu
  (Kurt Keville)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:57:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>TI Pandaboards improving at breakneck pace...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/6f39a64b3bd16571/3c57151dc240a53c?show_docid=3c57151dc240a53c</link>
  <description>
  probably better than a Moore&#39;s Law rate... some benchmarks are twice &lt;br&gt; as good after you upgrade your OS... substantially facilitated by the &lt;br&gt; armhf kernel... &lt;br&gt; see &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=ubuntu_1204_omap4460&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; we are going to try and recreate these benchmarks with attached power
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/6f39a64b3bd16571/3c57151dc240a53c?show_docid=3c57151dc240a53c</guid>
  <author>
  kkevi...@mit.edu
  (Kurt Keville)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:29:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Benchmark: Video Card Power Consumption</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/6f39a64b3bd16571/49b80b40869f9799?show_docid=49b80b40869f9799</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; A group in France has done a hands-on measurement of the real power &lt;br&gt; consumption of 73 different video cards: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.geeks3d.com/20100226/the-real-power-consumption-of-73-graphics-cards/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Best -Federico
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/6f39a64b3bd16571/49b80b40869f9799?show_docid=49b80b40869f9799</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:21:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Judge 0.1</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/030330c7fdef5d66/309e0099b58d98ac?show_docid=309e0099b58d98ac</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; At Ubuntu Developer Summit, I just learned of a new bit of shell &lt;br&gt; benching wizardry (or aspiring to be one): &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://judge.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Judge compares the run time for two programs and tells you if there’s &lt;br&gt; a statistically significant difference.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/030330c7fdef5d66/309e0099b58d98ac?show_docid=309e0099b58d98ac</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:41:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>SSD Performance</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/f9abcc196fc2ffbc/6f33116e4d39725a?show_docid=6f33116e4d39725a</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; Kyle Rankin has an interesting piece benchmarking current generation &lt;br&gt; SSDs in six different ways on Linux Journal of October (now only &lt;br&gt; online/paywalled, no more paper edition), &amp;quot;Return to Solid State&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Kyle compares login time, desktop startup, hdparam, bonnie++,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/f9abcc196fc2ffbc/6f33116e4d39725a?show_docid=6f33116e4d39725a</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:51:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>ZCAV on display</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/904e095f27a9873d/0dbf0ed158bd8218?show_docid=0dbf0ed158bd8218</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; I pointed to an article on CPU last year discussing ZCAV on current &lt;br&gt; hard drives, and the difference was found to be fairly limited. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; I was trying out the Ubuntu &amp;quot;Disk Utility&amp;quot; built-in benchmark a few &lt;br&gt; days back, and I was surprised by results showing that in a Lenovo
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/904e095f27a9873d/0dbf0ed158bd8218?show_docid=0dbf0ed158bd8218</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:47:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Performance Basics &quot;always-on&quot; awareness</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/b864479d524f3a7c/55eb32e485f0b369?show_docid=55eb32e485f0b369</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; I was playing with Byobu in Ubuntu 11.04 today, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;https://launchpad.net/byobu&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/oneiric/en/man1/byobu.1.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; and I was very pleased with the results. This is a screenshot of what &lt;br&gt; my quake-terminal looks like now: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/86679254@N00/6163955481/lightbox/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/b864479d524f3a7c/55eb32e485f0b369?show_docid=55eb32e485f0b369</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:57:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Steve Best on Systemtap</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/4fecb535963a12d1/6e053daf9e25f08b?show_docid=6e053daf9e25f08b</link>
  <description>
  Hello Computing Performance, &lt;br&gt; Nice piece by Steve Best (author of the memorable &amp;quot;Linux Debugging &lt;br&gt; and Performance Tuning&amp;quot;) on Linux Pro Magazine #129 (August 2011): &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;On Tap&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; It is a nice introduction to SystemTap with basic examples of time &lt;br&gt; accounting, entry/exit counting, and more general instrumenting (which
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/computing-performance/browse_thread/thread/4fecb535963a12d1/6e053daf9e25f08b?show_docid=6e053daf9e25f08b</guid>
  <author>
  flucifr...@acm.org
  (Federico Lucifredi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:15:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

