Compojure 0.3.1 released

3 views
Skip to first unread message

James Reeves

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 1:01:21 PM9/28/09
to Compojure
Hi folks,

I've just released Compojure 0.3.1. It was going to be 0.3, but
ordnungswidrig reported that the route paramaters were not urldecoded,
so I had to make a last minute correction.

This version of Compojure has had little new functionality since 0.2,
but there have been lots of bug fixes. It should be pretty stable
currently.

The next version will be 0.4. I'm going to split off a lot of generic
functionality into separate libraries, such as the HTML generator and
the HTTP routes syntax. I'm also going to begin using the Ring 0.1
libraries. By putting these pieces of functionality into external
libraries, I hope that other web development frameworks can make use
them as well.

- James

Nicolas Buduroi

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 3:09:02 PM9/28/09
to Compojure
Long time no see! Great to see things moving forward. I've taken a
long break away from the computer this summer and now I'm working on
some projects that unfortunately doesn't make use of Clojure or
Compojure.

I see there hasn't been work done on the website since last time I
checked. It would be nice to have a page with the release history, to
see what we have missed if we don't follow up this project history for
some time. By the way, is it just me or Google Groups search feature
is utterly broken?

I'll probably get back to contributing sooner or later.

In the meantime, keep going, this little framework is really great.

- budu

Wilson MacGyver

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 3:15:47 PM9/28/09
to comp...@googlegroups.com
Hi there,

I noticed compojure.org is still down. Will it come back up
or should we only check the github location now?

Thanks
--
Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.

Daniel Renfer

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 3:19:28 PM9/28/09
to comp...@googlegroups.com
+1 for getting the compojure site up as incomplete as it is.

The last time I looked at it, it was looking pretty good. There are
tons of open source projects out there with incomplete documentation.
Why should compojure be any different? :)

Plus, having the site up at http://compojure.org/ will probably spur
more contributors to the docs.

James Reeves

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 3:20:10 PM9/28/09
to Compojure
On Sep 28, 8:15 pm, Wilson MacGyver <wmacgy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed compojure.org is still down. Will it come back up
> or should we only check the github location now?

Only the preview subdomain is up: http://preview.compojure.org

The main domain was never up in the first place, or at least wasn't
meant to be.

- James

James Reeves

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 3:25:16 PM9/28/09
to Compojure
On Sep 28, 8:09 pm, Nicolas Buduroi <nbudu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see there hasn't been work done on the website since last time I
> checked. It would be nice to have a page with the release history, to
> see what we have missed if we don't follow up this project history for
> some time.

Currently it's a matter of finding time to work on it. Currently I'm
doing a lot of stuff at work, and on Capra, my package manager which
I'll eventually use to manage Compojure's dependencies.

I've been thinking of redoing the site as a simple Wiki. It's
currently too much maintenance.

> By the way, is it just me or Google Groups search feature
> is utterly broken?

It does seem to be.

- James

James Reeves

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 3:28:25 PM9/28/09
to Compojure
On Sep 28, 8:19 pm, Daniel Renfer <d...@kronkltd.net> wrote:
> Plus, having the site up at http://compojure.org/ will probably spur  
> more contributors to the docs.

I'll try and find time to do it, but my current focus is on the Capra
and Capra-Server projects.

- James

Aaron Bedra

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 3:31:07 PM9/28/09
to comp...@googlegroups.com
It would be nice to have the current site up as is with the broken
links fixed up. I have started down the path of getting an ant script
in place that will let devs get the project up and going quickly.
James, I just sent you a pull request yesterday with an updated
build.xml. I would be more than happy to get the site to at least
show the information that is working. I would even be more than happy
to host it.

Cheers,

Aaron
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages