I guess to reduce 'dependency', since mostly are in PHP, having a .rb
will further confuse user, IMHO. So we only have scss as input and css
as output. There is already built-in facility to regenerate the CSS on
demand, on cron, on clearing theme registry (development), or can be
disabled fully on production site.
Furthermore, the 'configuration' can be saved inside theme .info file,
supported command line options like css_dir, sass_dir or images_dir
can be defined inside the .info file, which get automatically convert
to the equivalent command line option --css-dir and so on.
How could that be a strange option? Since there is the already the
configuration additional_import_paths, but without the equivalent
command line option. So it is quite natural to have a command line
option --additional-import-paths, no? =)
What's the equivalent for 'compass compile' in sass command, but that
can't support other framework import (somewhere in your doc), if not
mistaken?
Will also try to see if personal framework could be a solution. Can
personal framework reside in any folder? Will it not have the same
import path problem?
On Aug 10, 12:06 pm, Chris Eppstein <
ch...@eppsteins.net> wrote:
> It's a strange option for a compass project on the command line.
>
> Why can't you have a configuration file? Perhaps this should be a feature
> request to the drupal plugin?
>
> Alternatively, you can call the sass command line like so:
>
> sass -r compass `compass imports` -I my_other_import_directory
>
> and that's effectively the compass environment.
>
> Chris
>
> > <
compass-users%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com<
compass-users%252Buns...@googlegroups.com>