I finally got a #9 GXE VL bus card which I am planning to use with XFree86 2.0 once it's released. However, I noticed some odd behaviour while using it under both DOS and NeXTSTEP 3.1.
Unless I disable the internal cache, after a brief period of time (until the cache begins to fill I imagine), the text on the screen is somewhat mangled. It is not complete garbage but it is definitely somewhat corrupted. Once NeXTSTEP gets into VGA mode, this is manifested as a sqare area around the cursor being damaged and leaving a trail of droppings as it goes. Again, if I disable the internal cache on the motherboard, things work OK (though, I suspect somewhat slower).
I'm not sure whether this is a problem with the #9 card, the motherboard (I suspect), or DOS/NeXTSTEP. A friend of mine has an identical motherboard and has run it with an ATI GUP (though not a VL bus version) and I'm wondering if I should try to exchange the #9 for a VL bus ATI GUP.
The motherboard is a 486/33, AMI BIOS (12/12/93), not sure of the chipset (SIS I believe). If anyone has ideas or has had similar experiences, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
Thanks! Gary -- Gary Thompson gthomp...@lgc.com Landmark Graphics Houston, TX Phone: (713) 560-1262 Fax: (713) 560-1277 "Vending machines SHOULD respond to a [finger] request with a list of all items currently available for purchase..." -RFC1288
In article <garyt.749316...@lgc.com> ga...@lgc.com (Gary Thompson) writes: > I finally got a #9 GXE VL bus card which I am planning to use > with XFree86 2.0 once it's released. However, I noticed some > odd behaviour while using it under both DOS and NeXTSTEP 3.1.
> Unless I disable the internal cache, after a brief period of > time (until the cache begins to fill I imagine), the text on > the screen is somewhat mangled. It is not complete garbage but > it is definitely somewhat corrupted. Once NeXTSTEP gets into > VGA mode, this is manifested as a sqare area around the cursor > being damaged and leaving a trail of droppings as it goes. > Again, if I disable the internal cache on the motherboard, > things work OK (though, I suspect somewhat slower).
> I'm not sure whether this is a problem with the #9 card, the > motherboard (I suspect), or DOS/NeXTSTEP. A friend of mine > has an identical motherboard and has run it with an ATI GUP > (though not a VL bus version) and I'm wondering if I should > try to exchange the #9 for a VL bus ATI GUP.
> The motherboard is a 486/33, AMI BIOS (12/12/93), not sure of > the chipset (SIS I believe). If anyone has ideas or has had > similar experiences, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
> Thanks! > Gary > -- > Gary Thompson gthomp...@lgc.com > Landmark Graphics Houston, TX Phone: (713) 560-1262 Fax: (713) 560-1277 > "Vending machines SHOULD respond to a [finger] request with a list > of all items currently available for purchase..." -RFC1288
The framebuffer memory on your video card is being cached. You need to disable caching of that range of memory, in the AMI BIOS setup.
-- David Wexelblat <d...@mtgzfs3.att.com> (908) 957-5871 Fax: (908) 957-5305 AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ 07748
XFree86 requests should be addressed to <xfre...@physics.su.oz.au>
"If you don't expect too much from me, you might not be let down." -- Gin Blossoms, "Hey Jealousy"
In article <garyt.749316...@lgc.com> ga...@lgc.com (Gary Thompson) writes: >I finally got a #9 GXE VL bus card which I am planning to use >with XFree86 2.0 once it's released. However, I noticed some >odd behaviour while using it under both DOS and NeXTSTEP 3.1.
Have not heard of any problems with the latest rev level of #9 cards VLB or ISA with XS3 and NetBSD-0.8 or FreeBSD
Cheers, Amancio
-- This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3 Amancio Hasty | Home: (415) 495-3046 | ftp-site depository of all my work: e-mail ha...@netcom.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming
>> The motherboard is a 486/33, AMI BIOS (12/12/93), not sure of >> the chipset (SIS I believe). If anyone has ideas or has had >> similar experiences, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
>> Thanks! >> Gary >> -- >The framebuffer memory on your video card is being cached. You need to >disable caching of that range of memory, in the AMI BIOS setup.
The stated problem is more akined to a server problem rather than a caching problem. The clue is that when the machine is running with the internal cache disabled the graphic commands are probably not being delivered fast enough to the cards. In the S3 928 databook is not well stated how to determine when the graphic engine is free for doing bitblts at least is different than the old S3 911 cards.
The S3 928 graphic queue is 16 entries deep and the S3 interface provides for checking only 8 queue entries. For bitblt operations, the proper way to wait is to check for the graphic engine to be idle, if you don't you will get strange behavior.
At any rate we have tested the #9 S3 928 VLB with a fast 486DX266 and found no such anomalies with XS3.
Since, the stated problem is with a commercial product I would suggest to contact #9 and ask them if they have a solution to the problem. Must say that #9s technical support is top-notch.
Hope this helps, Amancio -- This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3 Amancio Hasty | Home: (415) 495-3046 | ftp-site depository of all my work: e-mail ha...@netcom.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming