Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Strange behaviour with VL #9GXE Level 12
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Gary Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 1993, 11:57 am
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: ga...@lgc.com (Gary Thompson)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 15:28:38 GMT
Local: Wed, Sep 29 1993 11:28 am
Subject: Strange behaviour with VL #9GXE Level 12
I finally got a #9 GXE VL bus card which I am planning to use
with XFree86 2.0 once it's released.  However, I noticed some
odd behaviour while using it under both DOS and NeXTSTEP 3.1.

Unless I disable the internal cache, after a brief period of
time (until the cache begins to fill I imagine), the text on
the screen is somewhat mangled.  It is not complete garbage but
it is definitely somewhat corrupted.  Once NeXTSTEP gets into
VGA mode, this is manifested as a sqare area around the cursor
being damaged and leaving a trail of droppings as it goes.
Again, if I disable the internal cache on the motherboard,
things work OK (though, I suspect somewhat slower).

I'm not sure whether this is a problem with the #9 card, the
motherboard (I suspect), or DOS/NeXTSTEP.  A friend of mine
has an identical motherboard and has run it with an ATI GUP
(though not a VL bus version) and I'm wondering if I should
try to exchange the #9 for a VL bus ATI GUP.

The motherboard is a 486/33, AMI BIOS (12/12/93), not sure of
the chipset (SIS I believe).  If anyone has ideas or has had
similar experiences, I'd appreciate hearing from you.

Thanks!
Gary
--
Gary Thompson                                                gthomp...@lgc.com
Landmark Graphics  Houston, TX      Phone: (713) 560-1262  Fax: (713) 560-1277
     "Vending machines SHOULD respond to a [finger] request with a list
          of all items currently available for purchase..." -RFC1288


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David E. Wexelblat  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 1993, 4:20 pm
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: d...@mtgzfs3.att.com (David E. Wexelblat)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 20:07:37 GMT
Local: Wed, Sep 29 1993 4:07 pm
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour with VL #9GXE Level 12

The framebuffer memory on your video card is being cached.  You need to
disable caching of that range of memory, in the AMI BIOS setup.

--
David Wexelblat <d...@mtgzfs3.att.com>  (908) 957-5871  Fax: (908) 957-5305
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ  07748

XFree86 requests should be addressed to <xfre...@physics.su.oz.au>

"If you don't expect too much from me, you might not be let down."
        -- Gin Blossoms, "Hey Jealousy"


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Amancio Hasty Jr  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 1993, 4:27 pm
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: ha...@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 19:22:33 GMT
Local: Wed, Sep 29 1993 3:22 pm
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour with VL #9GXE Level 12

In article <garyt.749316...@lgc.com> ga...@lgc.com (Gary Thompson) writes:
>I finally got a #9 GXE VL bus card which I am planning to use
>with XFree86 2.0 once it's released.  However, I noticed some
>odd behaviour while using it under both DOS and NeXTSTEP 3.1.

Have not heard of any problems with the latest rev level of #9 cards
VLB or ISA with XS3 and NetBSD-0.8 or FreeBSD

Cheers,
        Amancio

--
This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3
Amancio Hasty           |  
Home: (415) 495-3046    |  ftp-site depository of all my work:
e-mail ha...@netcom.com    |  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Amancio Hasty Jr  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 1993, 7:45 pm
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: ha...@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 22:30:44 GMT
Local: Wed, Sep 29 1993 6:30 pm
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour with VL #9GXE Level 12

>> The motherboard is a 486/33, AMI BIOS (12/12/93), not sure of
>> the chipset (SIS I believe).  If anyone has ideas or has had
>> similar experiences, I'd appreciate hearing from you.

>> Thanks!
>> Gary
>> --
>The framebuffer memory on your video card is being cached.  You need to
>disable caching of that range of memory, in the AMI BIOS setup.

>--
>David Wexelblat <d...@mtgzfs3.att.com>  (908) 957-5871  Fax: (908) 957-5305
>AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ  07748

The stated problem is more akined to a server problem rather than
a caching problem. The clue is that when the machine is running
with the internal cache disabled the graphic commands are probably
not being delivered fast enough to the cards. In the S3 928 databook
is not well stated how to determine when the graphic engine is
free for doing bitblts at least is different than the old S3 911 cards.

The S3 928 graphic queue is  16 entries deep and the S3 interface provides
for checking only 8 queue entries. For bitblt operations, the proper way to
wait is to check for the graphic engine to be idle, if you don't you will
get strange behavior.

At any rate we have tested the #9 S3 928 VLB with a fast 486DX266 and
found no such anomalies with XS3.

Since, the stated problem is with a commercial product I would suggest
to contact #9 and ask them if they have a solution to the problem.
Must say that #9s technical support is top-notch.

        Hope this helps,
        Amancio
--
This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3
Amancio Hasty           |  
Home: (415) 495-3046    |  ftp-site depository of all my work:
e-mail ha...@netcom.com    |  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »