Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

VAXstation 3100-M38 Memory + Ultrix ?

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael Kraemer

unread,
Mar 1, 2008, 5:34:44 PM3/1/08
to
hello world,

I have this vintage VS3138 running Ultrix/VAX 4.5.
The machine has these strange memory cards,
base + piggy back unit.
Recently I acquired cards with larger capacity,
at least that's what I thought.
Console (TEST 50) tells me I should have 32MB
(8MB onboard plus the two extra cards),
which looks OK to me.
However, when I boot Ultrix, it tells
me it sees only 20MB.
Is this a known behaviour, or
does it mean one of the memory boards
went belly-up in the mean time ?

I've seen similar behaviour on DECstations,
where certain memory configurations are accepted
by the console, but are rejected by Ultrix.

TIA,
MK

Bob Koehler

unread,
Mar 3, 2008, 8:28:13 AM3/3/08
to
In article <fqclm0$tpg$00$1...@news.t-online.com>, Michael Kraemer <M.Kr...@gsi.de> writes:
> hello world,
>
> I have this vintage VS3138 running Ultrix/VAX 4.5.

I'll assume you mean VAXStation 3100 Model 38. Shortened forms are
not unique. (Maybe it's a VAXServer?)

> The machine has these strange memory cards,
> base + piggy back unit.
> Recently I acquired cards with larger capacity,
> at least that's what I thought.
> Console (TEST 50) tells me I should have 32MB
> (8MB onboard plus the two extra cards),
> which looks OK to me.
> However, when I boot Ultrix, it tells
> me it sees only 20MB.
> Is this a known behaviour, or
> does it mean one of the memory boards
> went belly-up in the mean time ?

IIRC, in ULTRIX days you may have had to regenerate the kernel to
recognise more memory.

Michael Kraemer

unread,
Mar 3, 2008, 8:43:43 AM3/3/08
to
Bob Koehler schrieb:

> In article <fqclm0$tpg$00$1...@news.t-online.com>, Michael Kraemer <M.Kr...@gsi.de> writes:

>>I have this vintage VS3138 running Ultrix/VAX 4.5.
>
>
> I'll assume you mean VAXStation 3100 Model 38.

Yes. Sometimes I prefer sloppy language.

> IIRC, in ULTRIX days you may have had to regenerate the kernel to
> recognise more memory.

OK, I'll look into this one, but
I'm not sure if this is generally true for "modern" versions
such as 4.5. At least with DECstations I observed that the
Ultrix boot procedure immediately reported the increase
in available memory after a memory upgrade.
I think I saw a similar effect for the VAXstations,
but there Ultrix maxes out at 20MB.
I find it confusing that the OS reports different numbers
than the console.
A similar effect occurs with DECstations when they are
populated with RAM parts of different capacity (i.e.
mixed 8 and 32MB). I once had a single 32MB part in the
first memory slot and 8MB in the remaining slots.
I was happy the console reported lots of memory,
but Ultrix only took the first 32MB :-(
This behaviour is even mentioned in the Ultrix FAQ,
but no mention of Ultrix on VAX.

Bob Koehler

unread,
Mar 3, 2008, 12:06:24 PM3/3/08
to
In article <fqgvab$mfa$03$1...@news.t-online.com>, Michael Kraemer <M.Kr...@gsi.de> writes:
>
> Yes. Sometimes I prefer sloppy language.
>

Actually, I see it now in the title.

0 new messages