Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.unix.solaris
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion dbx SIGSEGV on Solaris 9 w/ libmalloc.so.1
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Roland Mainz  
View profile  
 More options Jul 31 2004, 12:25 pm
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris
From: Roland Mainz <roland.ma...@nrubsig.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:25:54 +0200
Local: Sat, Jul 31 2004 12:25 pm
Subject: Re: dbx SIGSEGV on Solaris 9 w/ libmalloc.so.1
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Seongbae Park wrote:
> >    Could anyone tell me if this happens on their systems?

> >    When I export LD_PRELOAD=libmalloc.so.1 on Solaris 9 and run dbx, it
> > crashes.

> > truss reports:
> > brk(0x1005DC150)                                = 0
> >      Incurred fault #6, FLTBOUNDS  %pc = 0xFFFFFFFF7F200FC8
> >        siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0x00014000
> >      Received signal #11, SIGSEGV [default]
> >        siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0x00014000

> > dbx version:
> >   Forte Developer 7 Dbx Debugger 7.0 Patch 115977-02 2004/04/07
> > (latest patch 115977-03 crashes as well)

> > This problem does not appear on Solaris 7 with dbx version:
> >   Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 Dbx Debugger 6.2 Patch 115117-01 2003/12/17

> > However dbx appears to run fine with any other malloc replacement
> > library (watchmalloc/bsdmalloc/mtmalloc).

> > Just want to make sure it's not some configuration issue on my end.

> No, it's not your fault.
> This is yet another manifestation of the bug 4846556.
> libmalloc doesn't have valloc() and memalign(),

... same applies to libbsdmalloc, libmapmalloc, libmtmalloc, watchmalloc
etc. which prevents their usage in applications like "mozilla" (which
currently suffers from huge memory fragmentation problems) ... ;-(

----

Bye,
Roland

--
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google