On 01/21/2012 08:42, Balwinder S Dheeman wrote:
>> Probably not but, in our defense, this not a "distribution" or distro in
>> common parlance.
> I wonder, why the BSD people feel ashamed to call the variants as a
> distribution. Were not BSD4.4 and earlier releases of UNIX called
> Berkeley's Software Distribution? cf.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Software_Distribution
Well, VirtualBSD is not really a variant, just a FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
that has been packaged to make it attractive and, why not, "less
intimidating" for first timers. No to mention that nowadays we have
"distros" rather than "distributions" (a la distrowatch) and I'm not
saying it as a bad thing either, but we'd rather not give the wrong
impression or create false expectations.
> Thank God, you agree that it is not an easy or time consuming task to
> build everything again and again even for an update or upgrade.
This is a well know problem and probably a bigger one than hardware
support, but nowadays computers are fast enough that updating the
software in the ports collection is quite fast too -- unless it's
LibreOffice/OpenOffice or Java. But it's clear that it's one aspect that
could be improved considerably.
> Believe me or not, there could 100's of 1000s aspirants who would love
> to try FreeBSD again, provided it ships better binary updates and, or
> upgrades similar to most popular Linux distributions.
We considered PC-BSD style PBIs for a while, but we don't really like
the fact that each piece of software comes with its own copy of
libraries, binaries, man pages (and even include files) for its
requirements. Okay, disk space is cheap, but if a library gets updated
to offer added functionality or security patches, the installed software
won't take advantage of that.
> I Hope, you're already aware of the fact that Ubuntu or most of its
> derivatives can be installed within a few minutes with a single click
> and the users can try these off of a CD, DVD and memstick well before
> they decide to install it onto a real/hard disk.
Of course, but this doesn't really help the FreeBSD camp, does it? ;-)
> Is it possible to install/port the FreeBSD/VirtualBSD onto a memstick
> and create persistent home and, or other mount points like Ubuntu?
Not as such, but it's certainly possible to copy everything on top of a
basic FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE installation to carry over "software and
environment" and then edit the relevant configuration files. It's not
for the faint of heart and certainly not for the impatient, but we might
even provide step by step instruction if there's enough interest.
Thank you for your feedback!
Reece