libreoffice problem
Mike Scott
message:-
%lowriter
javaPathHelper: not found
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libz.so.6" not found, required by
"libtlfi.so"
javaPathHelper appears to be an ignorable message from what I glean off
the web.
However, I have libz.so.4 on my system, but I can't see where to get .6;
afaik all the packages are fairly up to date. (And dropping in a symlink
doesn't help; something's being picky about library versions.)
Grubbing through the ports database doesn't cast light either:
data# grep -ri libz.so /var/db/
Binary file /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db matches
/var/db/pkg/compat7x-i386-7.3.703000.201008_1/+CONTENTS:lib/compat/libz.so.4
/var/db/pkg/linux_base-f10-10_3/+CONTENTS:lib/libz.so.1
/var/db/pkg/linux_base-f10-10_3/+CONTENTS:lib/libz.so.1.2.3
except to show that libz.so appears in multiple ports. My compat7x
package appears current.
Ideas please?
fbsd 8.2/i386, btw.
TIA.
--
Mike Scott (unet2 <at> [deletethis] scottsonline.org.uk)
Harlow Essex England
Lowell Gilbert
> I've just been trying to get lo up and running, but get a twin error
> message:-
>
> %lowriter
> javaPathHelper: not found
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libz.so.6" not found, required by
> "libtlfi.so"
>
> javaPathHelper appears to be an ignorable message from what I glean
> off the web.
Yes. It doesn't bother me.
> However, I have libz.so.4 on my system, but I can't see where to get
> .6; afaik all the packages are fairly up to date. (And dropping in a
> symlink doesn't help; something's being picky about library versions.)
That's why there are versions.
It looks like you've got a 9.x package on a 7.x system.
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
Mike Scott
> Mike Scott<usen...@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> writes:
>
>> I've just been trying to get lo up and running, but get a twin error
>> message:-
>>
>> %lowriter
>> javaPathHelper: not found
>> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libz.so.6" not found, required by
>> "libtlfi.so"
>>
>> javaPathHelper appears to be an ignorable message from what I glean
>> off the web.
>
> Yes. It doesn't bother me.
>
>> However, I have libz.so.4 on my system, but I can't see where to get
>> .6; afaik all the packages are fairly up to date. (And dropping in a
>> symlink doesn't help; something's being picky about library versions.)
>
> That's why there are versions.
Well, a symlink sometimes helps :-)
>
> It looks like you've got a 9.x package on a 7.x system.
Ah, thanks. 8.2 actually, not 7.x. I picked it up from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/editors/
assuming that they'd be for the 8.2 release. There seems nothing in the
package file to say what it was built on :-(
I've just had another look around, and there's no libreoffice in
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/editors/
So, is the package available anywhere for 8.2? There's no way I could
expect to build this from the port on my tiny system!
Lowell Gilbert
> On 07/07/11 21:47, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Mike Scott<usen...@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> writes:
>>
>>> I've just been trying to get lo up and running, but get a twin error
>>> message:-
>>>
>>> %lowriter
>>> javaPathHelper: not found
>>> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libz.so.6" not found, required by
>>> "libtlfi.so"
>>>
>>> javaPathHelper appears to be an ignorable message from what I glean
>>> off the web.
>>
>> Yes. It doesn't bother me.
>>
>>> However, I have libz.so.4 on my system, but I can't see where to get
>>> .6; afaik all the packages are fairly up to date. (And dropping in a
>>> symlink doesn't help; something's being picky about library versions.)
>>
>> That's why there are versions.
>
> Well, a symlink sometimes helps :-)
>>
>> It looks like you've got a 9.x package on a 7.x system.
>
> Ah, thanks. 8.2 actually, not 7.x. I picked it up from
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/editors/
I'm running RELENG_8, and I've got libz.so.5. I *think* that you should
too.
> assuming that they'd be for the 8.2 release. There seems nothing in
> the package file to say what it was built on :-(
>
> I've just had another look around, and there's no libreoffice in
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/editors/
>
> So, is the package available anywhere for 8.2? There's no way I could
> expect to build this from the port on my tiny system!
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/editors/libreoffice-3.3.3.tbz
might work for you.