<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix</id>
  <title type="text">comp.unix.aix Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  IBM&#39;s version of UNIX.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/comp.unix.aix/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="comp.unix.aix feed"/>
  <updated>2010-01-01T14:21:57Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Kirkby</name>
  <email>drkir...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-01T14:21:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/207bfe7b32fedc7a/5a0b7e85ceb7cba7?show_docid=5a0b7e85ceb7cba7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/207bfe7b32fedc7a/5a0b7e85ceb7cba7?show_docid=5a0b7e85ceb7cba7"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Could someone please try this 6-lic C program?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thank you both for computing this. Solaris on SPARC gives a different &lt;br&gt; value as you can see if Sun Studio is used. In fact, it gives a &lt;br&gt; different value with gcc if a slightly more complex program is &lt;br&gt; compiled. It would appear that in this case, gcc can inline this, so &lt;br&gt; does not need to make a call to the maths library.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>sjm</name>
  <email>sjm_n...@yahoo.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-01T12:40:31Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/207bfe7b32fedc7a/b92083d3c76fbedb?show_docid=b92083d3c76fbedb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/207bfe7b32fedc7a/b92083d3c76fbedb?show_docid=b92083d3c76fbedb"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Could someone please try this 6-lic C program?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  12:38 $ pwd &lt;br&gt; /home/simon/src/6-line &lt;br&gt; 12:38 $ ls &lt;br&gt; doit.c &lt;br&gt; 12:38 $ cat doit.c &lt;br&gt; int main() { &lt;br&gt; printf(&amp;quot;%.16lf\n&amp;quot;,exp(1.0)); &lt;br&gt; 12:38 $ xlc -qversion &lt;br&gt; IBM XL C/C++ Enterprise Edition V8.0 for AIX &lt;br&gt; Version: 08.00.0000.0000 &lt;br&gt; 12:38 $ CC=xlc make CFLAGS=-lm doit &lt;br&gt; xlc -lm doit.c -o doit &lt;br&gt; 12:38 $ ./doit &lt;br&gt; 2.7182818284590451
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael Kraemer</name>
  <email>m.krae...@gsi.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-01T10:19:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/207bfe7b32fedc7a/71e35065252b8632?show_docid=71e35065252b8632</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/207bfe7b32fedc7a/71e35065252b8632?show_docid=71e35065252b8632"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Could someone please try this 6-lic C program?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  David Kirkby schrieb: &lt;br&gt; VAC 6, on AIX 5.1: &lt;br&gt; $ cc -o davidkirkby -lm davidkirkby.c &lt;br&gt; $ davidkirkby &lt;br&gt; 2.7182818284590451
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tim WBST Clarke</name>
  <email>wbstcla...@google.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-01T03:11:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/d5a3f3e3fb704d42/08bcd9e37c7f2179?show_docid=08bcd9e37c7f2179</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/d5a3f3e3fb704d42/08bcd9e37c7f2179?show_docid=08bcd9e37c7f2179"/>
  <title type="text">Re: RS/6000 J50/R50/SP2-high CPU cards</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi Kevin... &lt;br&gt; My J50 has 3 dual-cpu cards and I believe I have another spare, as Pete &lt;br&gt; Backhouse dropped out of contact before collecting the spare J50 I&#39;d picked &lt;br&gt; up for a song. It&#39;ll take me some time to get around to analysing and &lt;br&gt; photographing the cards, but I would guess that it would mostly be signal
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kevin Bowling</name>
  <email>kevin.bowl...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-31T20:57:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/d5a3f3e3fb704d42/3522256784e379a1?show_docid=3522256784e379a1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/d5a3f3e3fb704d42/3522256784e379a1?show_docid=3522256784e379a1"/>
  <title type="text">RS/6000 J50/R50/SP2-high CPU cards</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;m curious about the CPU cards as used on the 7013-J50, 7015-R50, SP2 &lt;br&gt; High Node, etc. &lt;br&gt; There were a TON of FRUs for the 200MHz part. I saw an ancient post &lt;br&gt; on this group that said IBM had a lot of trouble with the design of &lt;br&gt; this card. &lt;br&gt; After the &#39;X4D&#39;, it seems it was replaced by the &#39;4EG&#39;. I have 3 X4D
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Kirkby</name>
  <email>drkir...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-31T16:26:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/207bfe7b32fedc7a/ce38077a6e85e5a4?show_docid=ce38077a6e85e5a4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/207bfe7b32fedc7a/ce38077a6e85e5a4?show_docid=ce38077a6e85e5a4"/>
  <title type="text">Could someone please try this 6-lic C program?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Is there anyone with access to a native IBM C compiler who could tell &lt;br&gt; me the output of this program &lt;br&gt; int main() { &lt;br&gt; printf(&amp;quot;%.16lf\n&amp;quot;,exp(1.0)); &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve tried this program on 9 different hardware/software combinations, &lt;br&gt; using both the GNU and native compilers on AIX, HP-UX (PA-RISC), &lt;br&gt; Linux, Solaris 10 (SPARC), Open Solaris (x86). All except Sun Studio
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>brandtrade</name>
  <email>zhaojia13141...@163.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-28T15:58:43Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/6287521ab9e718f4/f4b735b870f5caa4?show_docid=f4b735b870f5caa4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/6287521ab9e718f4/f4b735b870f5caa4?show_docid=f4b735b870f5caa4"/>
  <title type="text">(paypal payment)( www.brandshoes08.com ) wholesale BOSS T-shirt</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  (paypal payment)( &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.brandtrade08.cn&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; ) wholesale Lacoste polo t &lt;br&gt; shirt &lt;br&gt; (paypal payment)( &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.brandtrade08.cn&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; ) wholesale Lacoste t shirt &lt;br&gt; solid color &lt;br&gt; (paypal payment)( &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.brandtrade08.cn&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; ) wholesale Lacoste sweater &lt;br&gt; (paypal payment)( &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.brandtrade08.cn&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; ) wholesale Lacoste shirt &lt;br&gt; (paypal payment)( &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.brandtrade08.cn&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; ) wholesale Lacoste
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Blazej Antczak</name>
  <email>bl.#rem.this#antc...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-26T03:35:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/6b8458abd81036df/a8f82d6fe09fc4c3?show_docid=a8f82d6fe09fc4c3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/6b8458abd81036df/a8f82d6fe09fc4c3?show_docid=a8f82d6fe09fc4c3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: emxdrv0</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; from name looks like emulex driver. Do you have maybe some FC interfaces &lt;br&gt; In machine? Anyway - look at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.emulex.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Rgrds, &lt;br&gt; Blazej
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>ZeDeufr</name>
  <email>frederic.hum...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-23T14:53:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/720b19ecd65217bf?show_docid=720b19ecd65217bf</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/720b19ecd65217bf?show_docid=720b19ecd65217bf"/>
  <title type="text">Re: LVM question : how to merge 2 VGs intoa single one without data loss ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The point is we don&#39;t have any free disk space to increase either VG. &lt;br&gt; That&#39;s why I was looking for a way to merge the 2 VGs into a single &lt;br&gt; one without having to backup/restore data. &lt;br&gt; The (rather stupid) way it has been designed, we have a full disk &lt;br&gt; cabinet dedicated to storage (SAN), sliced up into disks attached to
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Uwe Auer</name>
  <email>u...@franke-auer.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-22T14:49:30Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/387efb4b2300681f?show_docid=387efb4b2300681f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/387efb4b2300681f?show_docid=387efb4b2300681f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: LVM question : how to merge 2 VGs intoa single one without data loss ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Am 22.12.2009 14:21, schrieb ZeDeufr: &lt;br&gt; Hi, &lt;br&gt; forget about the &amp;quot;dd&amp;quot; thing. Even if you would be able to figure out the binary &lt;br&gt; structure of VGDA it would be required to change ODM, LVCB and there respective &lt;br&gt; references too. There must be a reason why there is no &amp;quot;mergevg&amp;quot; command :-) &lt;br&gt; PS: Still got not the point, why you are not using *additional* logical
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>ZeDeufr</name>
  <email>frederic.hum...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-22T13:21:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/311b0b6477374a8f?show_docid=311b0b6477374a8f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/311b0b6477374a8f?show_docid=311b0b6477374a8f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: LVM question : how to merge 2 VGs intoa single one without data loss ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks for answering. &lt;br&gt; There is no deliberate choice from us to have only 1 LV/FS per VG. &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s just the way it has been done on that particular server. &lt;br&gt; Had it been thought of before, we would have created 1 VG for the two &lt;br&gt; LV/FS, and wouldn&#39;t have had any problem reducing one of them to &lt;br&gt; extend the other...
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Uwe Auer</name>
  <email>u...@franke-auer.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-22T10:12:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/049b461c64d91b0b?show_docid=049b461c64d91b0b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/049b461c64d91b0b?show_docid=049b461c64d91b0b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: LVM question : how to merge 2 VGs intoa single one without data loss ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Am 22.12.2009 09:12, schrieb ZeDeufr: &lt;br&gt; Hi, &lt;br&gt; to my knowledge - no way. There is no offical AIX command or any &lt;br&gt; combination of LVM commands to achieve what you want. The only way to &lt;br&gt; get both LVs into the same VG is: &lt;br&gt; - get a third disk hdisk3 &lt;br&gt; - add hdisk3 to VG1 &lt;br&gt; - create a LV3 on VG1 of exact the same size of LV2 on VG2
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>ZeDeufr</name>
  <email>frederic.hum...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-22T08:12:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/d9258cbf931afed9?show_docid=d9258cbf931afed9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/44dba2a94f72325f/d9258cbf931afed9?show_docid=d9258cbf931afed9"/>
  <title type="text">LVM question : how to merge 2 VGs intoa single one without data loss ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi ! &lt;br&gt; Is there any way to merge 2 PVs belonging to 2 *different* VGs into 1 &lt;br&gt; VG *without* losing data already stored in the 2 PVs ? &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m working on AIX 5.3 ML4. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve got 2 different VGs, each with only one PV. Each VGs contains &lt;br&gt; only one LV/FS (jfs2) + the jfslog LV. &lt;br&gt; The FS (and the VGs) are big : around 12 Tb each. One of them is
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tim WBST Clarke</name>
  <email>wbstcla...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-21T16:32:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/2141256bbebc6c5e/d01569692438c277?show_docid=d01569692438c277</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/2141256bbebc6c5e/d01569692438c277?show_docid=d01569692438c277"/>
  <title type="text">Re: AIX CBT</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi again Prashant... &lt;br&gt; You&#39;ll want the other guys for AOX knowledge, I&#39;m just a poor old S/390 &lt;br&gt; techie and playing with AIX in my spare time, I happened to have the &lt;br&gt; Collection and sent it to Kevin, plus other manuals unrelated to AIX, to &lt;br&gt; disseminate to the wider audience. &lt;br&gt; Please call me Tim, BTW, as we Westerners don&#39;t usually use our surnames in
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>prashant</name>
  <email>p2006.prash...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-21T16:22:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/2141256bbebc6c5e/0f5c09d1b577b21a?show_docid=0f5c09d1b577b21a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.aix/browse_frm/thread/2141256bbebc6c5e/0f5c09d1b577b21a?show_docid=0f5c09d1b577b21a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: AIX CBT</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thank you Clarke. It is all pdf&#39;s but quite knowledgeful. Please share &lt;br&gt; with me if you have anything else also related to AIX.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
