Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

XML tutorial

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Fagnoli Cristiano

unread,
Mar 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/7/99
to
Hi,

Where can i find a tutorial about XML.
I try to read the W3C specification but it is not easy to understand.

Thanks in advance

Charles F. Goldfarb

unread,
Mar 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/7/99
to
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999 00:13:12 +0100, "Fagnoli Cristiano" <cr...@uno.dinamica.it>
wrote:

Several XML books have tutorials, and BobDuCharme has written an annotated
version of the W3C spec that is much easier to understand. See: www.xmlbooks.com
--
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
13075 Paramount Court * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
Prentice-Hall Series Editor * Definitive XML * Open Information Management
--

Andy Dingley

unread,
Mar 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/7/99
to
"Fagnoli Cristiano" <cr...@uno.dinamica.it> a écrit :

>Where can i find a tutorial about XML.

Try the usual sources - searching around Dejanews for this newsgroup
will give you some pointers. Anything by Tim Bray is probably good,
Wrox have some good ones, and Paul Prescod's Annotated XML Handbook
is a good general coverage.

Some comments from my own recent experience in learning XML:

- XML is only part of the story - There's just as much learning to do
on things like parsers and integration with the DOM.

- Be wary of old XML books - the specification has changed
drastically. Much of the Charles F Goldfarb range (as one example) is
not only less than helpful now, but positively damaging if you take
them as gospel. I wasted a lot of time after building a design based
on "XML by Example", then finding it was almost entirely obsolete.

- Example-based XML documentation is often more useful as early stage
introduction than protocol-based documentation.

- Watch out for Microsoft going their own way (plus ca change).
They've stuck with the old XML specification on some of the XSL
features, particularly in supporting embedded scripting. For once they
seem to have got it right and the W3C wrong !

--
Smert' Spamionem

Oliver Meyer

unread,
Mar 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/8/99
to
Andy Dingley wrote:

> "Fagnoli Cristiano" <cr...@uno.dinamica.it> a écrit :
>
> >Where can i find a tutorial about XML.
>

[...]

> Some comments from my own recent experience in learning XML:

[...]

> - Be wary of old XML books - the specification has changed
> drastically. Much of the Charles F Goldfarb range (as one example) is
> not only less than helpful now, but positively damaging if you take
> them as gospel. I wasted a lot of time after building a design based
> on "XML by Example", then finding it was almost entirely obsolete.

[...]

> Smert' Spamionem

Is "The SGML FAQ Book: Understanding the Foundation of HTML and XML" and
old XML Book already? The questions seem to be up to date. Are the
answers as well?

Oliver Meyer


Bill Trippe

unread,
Mar 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/8/99
to
http://www.nmpub.com
Andy Dingley <din...@codesmiths.com> wrote in message
news:36e8cc02....@news.demon.co.uk...

>- Be wary of old XML books - the specification has changed
>drastically. Much of the Charles F Goldfarb range (as one example) is
>not only less than helpful now, but positively damaging if you take
>them as gospel. I wasted a lot of time after building a design based
>on "XML by Example", then finding it was almost entirely obsolete.
>

Could you expand on this a bit? My experience has been that XSL has changed
drastically, especially recently, but XML has been relatively stable. I'd
like to hear a few more details so I know what you think the pitfalls are.

Thanks,

Bill


________________________
Bill Trippe
New Millennium Publishing
Content and Editorial Solutions
www.nmpub.com

Andy Dingley

unread,
Mar 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/8/99
to
"Bill Trippe" <btr...@erols.com> a écrit :

>My experience has been that XSL has changed
>drastically, especially recently, but XML has been relatively stable.

Sorry if I was unclear - it was the XSL changes that bit me.


Despite their somewhat over generous contents lists (24 pages ?!) and
the obsolescence issue, I do like the Goldfarb books. I hope they'll
produce some revised editions.


Ari M. Weinstein

unread,
Mar 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/8/99
to
The book Dr. Goldfarb referred to, XML: The Annotated Specification by Bob
DuCharme, is unlikely to be out of date. It contains the official 1.0
specification which was finalized over a year ago, in February 1998. This
book has quite a few XML examples which I'm finding very useful.

Hopefully XSL, XLink and XPointer will be finalized this summer. They're all
currently working drafts, and subject to change.

AMW

=====================================================
Ari M. Weinstein | FAMES EST OPTIMVS COQ
Graphic Design & Consulting |
a...@ariw.com | "Hunger is the
http://www.ariw.com | Best Cook

bob thickens

unread,
Mar 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/12/99
to
microsoft has a really nice xml tutorial on their web site. search for xml
tutorial

Charles F. Goldfarb wrote in message <36eacebb...@news.alink.net>...


>On Sun, 7 Mar 1999 00:13:12 +0100, "Fagnoli Cristiano"
<cr...@uno.dinamica.it>
>wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>

>>Where can i find a tutorial about XML.

Andrea Cataldo

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
Fagnoli Cristiano wrote:
>
> Where can i find a tutorial about XML.
> I try to read the W3C specification but it is not easy to understand.

You can go to the site http://www.xmlinfo.it where you can find a
tutorial for the beginners (that it will be located at
http://www.software.ibm.com/xml/education/index.html) or any document
you need about XML.

--
_
//\
Bye, //--\ndrea
(http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/9739)

Charles F. Goldfarb

unread,
Mar 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/14/99
to
I'd be interested in more details as well.

All of the books in my series are based on XML 1.0, which is the current spec.
When draft specs are discussed, we endeavor to point out their status to the
reader. XSL has changed recently, as Bill Trippe says, and the DOM spec has been
finalized (without the drastic changes that occurred with XSL). These changes
have affected small portions of some of the books in the series.

"XML by Example" has a chapter on XSL and a chapter on the DOM, and it clearly
identifies both as being works in progress.

"The XML Handbook" has one chapter on XSL basic concepts (which are still valid,
though the syntax has changed) and one chapter on a freeware XSL stylesheet
editor (which may still be helpful, although the tool itself is no longer so).
There are warnings about the volatility of the XSL spec.

"Designing XML Internet Applications" has a lengthy chapter on the DOM, which it
identifies as a working draft. XSL is mentioned only in passing.

Neither "Structuring XML Documents" nor "XML: The Annotated Specification"
discuss XSL or the DOM.

Volatility in high tech is a fact of life. For an Internet standard, XML has so
far been remarkably immune from it.

--

Charles F. Goldfarb

unread,
Mar 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/14/99
to
On Sun, 07 Mar 1999 20:29:40 GMT, din...@codesmiths.com (Andy Dingley) wrote:

>"Fagnoli Cristiano" <cr...@uno.dinamica.it> a écrit :
>

>>Where can i find a tutorial about XML.
>

>Paul Prescod's Annotated XML Handbook
>is a good general coverage.

Thanks for the recommendation, but it isn't clear which of two books in my
series you refer to:

"The XML Handbook", by Paul Prescod and myself, or "XML: The Annotated
Specification", by Bob DuCharme. The former contains tutorials for newcomers and
the non-technical; the latter is an annotated and illustrated spec and would be
considered "tutorial" only for people accustomed to learning from specs.

Andy Dingley

unread,
Mar 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/14/99
to
Cha...@SGMLsource.com (Charles F. Goldfarb) a écrit :

>Thanks for the recommendation, but it isn't clear which of two books in my
>series you refer to:

Sorry, my mistake, I would recommend the Paul Prescod "XML Handbook"
as a tutorial. My own favourite is the "Annotated" one (and the one I
still keep on my desk), but as you say, it's intended for people who
would be happy to read the raw spec, they're just trrying to do it
more quickly.


Rob Nichols

unread,
Mar 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/14/99
to
>>>I try to read the W3C specification but it is not easy to understand.

there is also Tim Brays Annotated ver. of the 1.0 spec...

http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm

Rob Nichols


------------
bob thickens wrote in message <7ccppf$b...@newsops.execpc.com>...


>microsoft has a really nice xml tutorial on their web site. search for xml
>tutorial
>
>Charles F. Goldfarb wrote in message <36eacebb...@news.alink.net>...
>>On Sun, 7 Mar 1999 00:13:12 +0100, "Fagnoli Cristiano"
><cr...@uno.dinamica.it>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>

>>>Where can i find a tutorial about XML.

>>>I try to read the W3C specification but it is not easy to understand.
>>>

>>>Thanks in advance
>>>
>>
>>Several XML books have tutorials, and BobDuCharme has written an annotated
>>version of the W3C spec that is much easier to understand. See:
>www.xmlbooks.com

pig...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/16/99
to
My name is Maria Pigato from Risetime TEchnologies in Chicago. We have a
client in Clearwater FLorida in need for a short term contractor.

After reading the details below please contact me if you are interested at
Ma...@risetime.com or 312-362-9930 ext 301.

The person they need would be working on a project that is loosely related to
the web project.
The individual will work on an EDI type project. They need a consultant that
has some familiarity with EDI to go down to the client site and research the
products needed to go online with the new XML type of business-to-business
document transfer systems. They need the consultant to work with the client
(and a couple of the clients business partners) and the software vendors to
come up with a solution and to put together a prototype system to show 'proof
of concept'. The client is already are using EDI - type now need to try this
XMLish EDI...

So, in bullet points the person should have:

3-4+ year experience in IT delivery type roles
ability to operate with little supervision
experience as a person that has moved a project from idea to delivery
ability to research an issue to find 'the correct product for the job'
good communication skills - ability to work with multiple groups of
people
ability to write design documents
some familiarity with EDI (equivalent experience with 'EDI like'
systems would be ok)
they need to understand what EDI is used for....
ability to work in florida for some of the time (during the week would
be best)

this person just needs to be able to think on their feet and have an
understanding of what EDI is all about. This is a 1 to 3 month assignment.
The consultant will be given a flat file and told to find the products needed
to put the info in the flat file into an XML document (and find the product
needed to send the XML document to a couple of their business partners).

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

0 new messages