Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

XSLT 2.0 for C++

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Jim Moss

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 1:42:53 PM12/11/09
to
May I ask if there is any interest in an XSLT 2.0 implementation for C+
+ that people would like to use in an Apache HTTP server environment
(i.e. non-Java, non-dotNet)?

Steve Ball

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 5:48:26 PM12/16/09
to james...@gmail.com
Hi Jim,

I have been working on an XPath 2.0/XSLT 2.0 implementation for
libxml2/libxslt. They are C libraries, rather than C++, but the
interface to C++ is trivial.

Work is stalled at the moment due to lack of resources (time and/or
money). Contact me for further information.

Cheers,
Steve Ball

Jim Moss

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 7:23:46 AM12/18/09
to
Thanks Steve for responding.

I posted my initial enquiry about XSLT 2 for C++ on Dec 12, 2009.
As of Dec 18, 2009 you are the only respondent (thanks).
That's fair enough time for a market survey in this forum.
Accordingly there can only be two possible conclusions:

1. Few people read comp.text.xml, or
2. Few people are interested in XSLT 2 for C or C++

Sadly this looks like that even if one were to produce a FOSS version
of XSLT 2 for, say, C++, the said one could not even give it away.

On a positive note though, one can say that more people seem to care
about global warming .. so guess that's a good thing.

Jim :-(

Joe Kesselman

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 2:50:02 PM12/18/09
to
If you want to survey the Apache community, I'd suggest that you ask on
Apache's own mailing lists -- probably the one for the C/C++ version of
their own XSLT processor.

--
Joe Kesselman,
http://www.love-song-productions.com/people/keshlam/index.html

{} ASCII Ribbon Campaign | "may'ron DaroQbe'chugh vaj bIrIQbej" --
/\ Stamp out HTML mail! | "Put down the squeezebox & nobody gets hurt."

William F Hammond

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 4:46:43 PM12/18/09
to
Jim Moss <james...@gmail.com> writes:

> I posted my initial enquiry about XSLT 2 for C++ on Dec 12, 2009.
> As of Dec 18, 2009 you are the only respondent (thanks).
> That's fair enough time for a market survey in this forum.
> Accordingly there can only be two possible conclusions:
>
> 1. Few people read comp.text.xml, or
> 2. Few people are interested in XSLT 2 for C or C++

By "XSLT 2 for C++" do you mean an XSLT 2 engine, or a library
for constructing XSLT 2 engines, written in C++?

I think a newsgroup is usually not a good place to take a
market survey -- doubly so if there other discussion groups
that are more narrowly focused on the issue.

There is always interest in well-written free(*) software.

-- Bill


(*) "free" as in "free speech", not "free beer".

0 new messages