AGU citation style and long citation numbers

[newb...@hotmail.com]

Hi eveyone,

I have installed the lastest version of AGUTeX and am presently
preparing a manuscript for the Journal of Geophysical Reseach. I am
using BibTeX and the agu04.bst to format the bibliography. However, I
notice that for an entry with a long citation number, e.g., B12602,
what is printed in the references is an extra comma such as:

Lastname, F., Some title, /109/, B12,602, doi:10.1029/.....

This gives the appearance that the article is in, Volume 109, Number
B12, page 602. What I've understood is that, with the new scheme, they
have done away with the "number" and "pages" and rely on a single
citation number and doi instead. In other words, what should be there
is:

Lastname, F., Some title, /109/, B12602, doi:10.1029/......

Has anyone else experienced this problem? Should I ignore it and
assume this will be dealt with in house?

Any suggestions are appreciated.

Cheers,

t.

[Tom Micevski]

newb...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Hi eveyone,
>
> I have installed the lastest version of AGUTeX and am presently
> preparing a manuscript for the Journal of Geophysical Reseach. I am

i would think that agu2001.cls would be best to use, but maybe you're
using tex, not latex.

> using BibTeX and the agu04.bst to format the bibliography. However, I
> notice that for an entry with a long citation number, e.g., B12602,
> what is printed in the references is an extra comma such as:
>
> Lastname, F., Some title, /109/, B12,602, doi:10.1029/.....
>
> This gives the appearance that the article is in, Volume 109, Number
> B12, page 602. What I've understood is that, with the new scheme, they
> have done away with the "number" and "pages" and rely on a single
> citation number and doi instead. In other words, what should be there
> is:
>
> Lastname, F., Some title, /109/, B12602, doi:10.1029/......
>
> Has anyone else experienced this problem? Should I ignore it and
> assume this will be dealt with in house?

i just did a quick test using
\documentclass[wrr]{agu2001}
\bibliographystyle{agu04}
and the eid/citation number came up properly, so it seems that it's some
problem on your side.

[newb...@hotmail.com]

> i would think that agu2001.cls would be best to use, but maybe you're
> using tex, not latex.

Yeah, I am using the agu2001.cls

I'll try a few other things. I suspect that I have the citation number
in the wrong field in my .bib file, but won't be able to check until
Monday.

Thanks for double checking and letting me know it's on my end.

Cheers,

t.