johnny_canuck
unread,May 24, 2013, 8:05:55 PM5/24/13You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Having been successfully working with the newpx fonts for several weeks now - sufficiently that I've reformatted a large-ish book (900 pages) using them. However, recently, *something* seems to have happened (package update?) such that certain maths structures no longer 'look like they should'. For example, the vertiucal separator in a condition probability expression - normally I use a \bigl( lhs \bigm rhs \bigr) construct, which used to look as I wanted (using newpx, or any other font), but now, when I compile (MWE example below), the vertical line is 'too high'. if I comment out the newpx stuff, and use good old mathpazo, no problem. Said problem only shows up with newpx. Was wondering if this was an issue with my TeX install only (MikTeX 2.9 under Windoze), or more generally.
Again, as of a couple of weeks ago, I compiled using newpx just fine - no issues as described. Something between then and now has changed - as far as I can tell, the newpx package hasn't changed, but something is now definitely wrong - for some reason. Suggestions/ideas most welcome.
----<mwe below>-----
\documentclass[11pt,letterpaper]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{nccmath}
% use following for better version of Palatino fonts - makes symbols italicized
%\usepackage[slantedGreek,sc]{mathpazo}
% use following for slightly better formed clones of Palatino
\usepackage{newpxtext}
\usepackage[cmintegrals,nosymbolsc]{newpxmath}
\usepackage[scr=rsfso]{mathalfa}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{eucal}
\begin{document}
\egin{equation*}
{\cal L}\bigl(p \bigm| \mbox{data}\bigr)={N\choose Y}S^Y(1-S)^{N-Y}
\end{equation*}
Or, dropping the binomial probability term (which is a constant, and
not a function of the parameter):
\begin{equation*}
{\cal L}\bigl(p\bigm|\mbox{data}\bigr)=S^Y(1-S)^{N-Y}
\end{equation*}
If we let $Q = (1-S)$, then we could re-write this likelihood as
\begin{equation*}
{\cal L}\bigl(p\bigm|\mbox{data}\bigr)=S^YQ^{N-Y}=S^3Q^5
\end{equation*}
\end{document}