Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion SQL/MP, descending order indexes, and the FIRST KEY () clause
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
LorenH  
View profile  
 More options Jul 21 2008, 9:27 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.tandem
From: LorenH <harri...@wfubmc.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jul 21 2008 9:27 am
Subject: Re: SQL/MP, descending order indexes, and the FIRST KEY () clause
On Jul 20, 4:31 am, Keith Dick <kdic...@comcast.net> wrote:

> herman1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Basically, the keys for the first partition must be BEFORE the lowest
> > values of the second partition.  
> > <snip>

> > On Jul 17, 5:34 pm, "Brian Ray" <be_...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> >> <snip>
> >>The index's first column is DESCending.

> >> <snip>

> Since he says the index is descending, is your answer correct?

Brian,

SQL/MP Reference Manual - Chapter P, heading "Partition Clause" (page
P-17 in the G06.28 online version).

Under the discussion of FIRST KEY parameter, it says FIRST KEY
"specifies the lowest value for the partition if the column for the
value has an ascending collating sequence; it specifies the highest
value for the partition if the column has a descending collating
sequence."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.