Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I need to do routing with IP/V6
19 views
Skip to first unread message
wbreidbach
May 29, 2012, 9:55:16 AM5/29/12
to
I have 2 systems, let me call them sysa and sysb. Sysa is connected to a special network "nets" via the IP/V7 product because we need the failover feature. Because of the very special structure of that network we are not able to add sysb to that network with the same functionality as sysa. That would require a redesign. The redesign has already been initiated but because of a bunch of partners involved that will take a lot of time.
So my sysb has to send messages into nets using the IP-connection on sysa. Unfortunately it is not possible to use Expand because you cannot use Expand to use IP/V6 on a remote system.
Does anybody have the same problem and probably a solution for that?
My approach would be to create a program accepting IP-connections and -messages and forwarding everything using a second IP-connection. But if someone already created such a program or another solution, I would not like to "reinvent the wheel".
So my sysb has to send messages into nets using the IP-connection on sysa. Unfortunately it is not possible to use Expand because you cannot use Expand to use IP/V6 on a remote system.
Does anybody have the same problem and probably a solution for that?
My approach would be to create a program accepting IP-connections and -messages and forwarding everything using a second IP-connection. But if someone already created such a program or another solution, I would not like to "reinvent the wheel".
ozbear
May 31, 2012, 12:24:59 AM5/31/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 06:55:16 -0700 (PDT), wbreidbach
<wolfgang....@bv-zahlungssysteme.de> wrote:
>I have 2 systems, let me call them sysa and sysb. Sysa is connected to a sp=
>ecial network "nets" via the IP/V7 product because we need the failover fea=
>ture. Because of the very special structure of that network we are not able=
> to add sysb to that network with the same functionality as sysa. That woul=
>d require a redesign. The redesign has already been initiated but because o=
>Unfortunately it is not possible to use Expand because you cannot use Expan=
>ages and forwarding everything using a second IP-connection. But if someone=
> already created such a program or another solution, I would not like to "r=
>einvent the wheel".=20
Too bad you cannot use legacy/conventional TCP/IP temposrily. The you
could just use the GATEWAY feature.
Oz
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
<wolfgang....@bv-zahlungssysteme.de> wrote:
>I have 2 systems, let me call them sysa and sysb. Sysa is connected to a sp=
>ecial network "nets" via the IP/V7 product because we need the failover fea=
>ture. Because of the very special structure of that network we are not able=
> to add sysb to that network with the same functionality as sysa. That woul=
>d require a redesign. The redesign has already been initiated but because o=
>f a bunch of partners involved that will take a lot of time.
>So my sysb has to send messages into nets using the IP-connection on sysa. =
>Unfortunately it is not possible to use Expand because you cannot use Expan=
>d to use IP/V6 on a remote system.
>Does anybody have the same problem and probably a solution for that?
>My approach would be to create a program accepting IP-connections and -mess=
>Does anybody have the same problem and probably a solution for that?
>ages and forwarding everything using a second IP-connection. But if someone=
> already created such a program or another solution, I would not like to "r=
>einvent the wheel".=20
Too bad you cannot use legacy/conventional TCP/IP temposrily. The you
could just use the GATEWAY feature.
Oz
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
wbreidbach
Jun 1, 2012, 4:07:14 AM6/1/12
to
Conventional IP would be much easier because it can be used via Expand.
It seems that we have to write that routing process ourselves.
It seems that we have to write that routing process ourselves.
0 new messages