Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion RFC: ULA Replacement for ZX Spectrum SE
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Alvin Albrecht  
View profile  
 More options May 16 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sinclair
From: Alvin Albrecht <aralb...@interchange.ubc.ca>
Date: 2000/05/16
Subject: Re: RFC: ULA Replacement for ZX Spectrum SE

kio (Günter Woigk) wrote:
> mode 1: (text mode) could be 512x192 like Sam Coupé or Timex2068. How is
> this screen organized im ram? color? layout? size?

In the ts2068 there are two display files: the normal one
at #4000 and a second identicaly formatted one at #6000.  
In one mode, the active display file can be swapped as in
the 128k spectrum.  In another mode, the pixel byte is
taken from the first display file and the corresponding
attribute is taken from the second display file.  This
yields 256x192 pixels and 32x192 attributes.  The 512x192
mode uses the first display for even columns 0,2,4,..,62
and the second display file for odd columns 1,3,5,..,63.
This way the SCLD (ULA) fetches alternating bytes from
the first display file and the second one with the address
for the second byte formed by setting bit 13.

> mode 2/3: no attribute table but 8 bit per pixel indexed colors.
> (49152 bytes)
> all those special switches could be added step by step. so lets start
> with the color palette thing first.

The problem with such a high resolution display is that
the spectrum is too slow to make use of it.  Even doubling
the clock frequency won't help since this display requires
8 times as much processing.  I think we should be thinking
in terms of hardware that will do all the work for us.

Alvin


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.