Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion RFC: ULA Replacement for ZX Spectrum SE
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Philip Kendall  
View profile  
 More options May 18 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sinclair
From: Philip Kendall <p...@ast.cam.ac.uk>
Date: 2000/05/18
Subject: Re: RFC: ULA Replacement for ZX Spectrum SE

Andrew Owen <ao...@brandnewco.org> writes:
> in article 392381B0.1B881...@interchange.ubc.ca, Alvin Albrecht at
> aralb...@interchange.ubc.ca wrote on 18/5/00 6:37 am:

> > 00: the ula responds to anything even

> 01 - Bound to be used by something

Lots of bits low, so yes.

> 02?  

See #00 comment above :-)

> 31 - Evil Kempston joystick?

Yep.

> FD - I think it's used by some disk interfaces

And by the 128Kb paging scheme (as in #7FFD, etc).

> What about E0 or E1?

#E0 is even. #E1 again has lots of bits low and will probably trigger
various things (eg Interface I, which is on bits 3 and 4).

I think you need to start thinking in terms of bit fields, rather than
simple numbers. The problem here, is that all the low 8 bits are taken
by something (ULA, 128Kb/Sinclair joysticks, disk interfaces,
Interface 1 x 2, Kempston x 3). To work out what's free, we're going
to have to find out the decoding schemes used by all these
interfaces...

OTOH, if we're not going to be writing large amounts of data to this
port, we could consider using one of the upper 8 bits of the bus, as
the extra set up time wouldn't then be important.

If we do want to use a port under #100, we may have to go for an Ugly
Hack solution of making it use either bit 2 or 3, and just say
`Sorry. You can't use this if you've got both a disk interface and an
If1 attached' -- what compatability problems are there between the
various disk interfaces and the If1 at present? For example, can you
use an MB02 with the If1?

Phil

--
 /             Philip Kendall <p...@ast.cam.ac.uk>             \
 | New? Read the FAQ: http://www.kendalls.demon.co.uk/cssfaq/ |
 \  Spread css-auth: http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~pak/decss.html /


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.