Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
no more hardware
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 52 - Expand all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John J Kuszewski  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9 1993, 11:49 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jo...@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (John J Kuszewski)
Date: 9 Feb 1993 11:49:08 -0500
Local: Tues, Feb 9 1993 11:49 am
Subject: no more hardware
I heard on WTOP radio (Washington, DC) this morning that NeXT is getting
out of the hardware business and trying to sell its factory to Canon.
Their story was based on a San Francisco Chronicle article.  Does anyone
have the original?

Observations:

1.  So half the observations I made before--that NeXT would dump its own
low-end hardware in favor of NextStep/Intel powered peecee clones--are
right. :-/

2.  The stories of non-peecee clone Intel machines are almost certainly
wrong.  Think about how much effort it would take to write new device
drivers for some wacko machine that would be as non-standard as the
slabs and cubes.

3.  This obviously makes the HP deal that much more important for high-
performance NextStep.  Remember that we have some very compute-intensive
software (Renderman) as standard equipment.  For it to be used as intended,
which would be a real holy-cow sort of thing, fast CPUs and fast memory
would be needed.

4.  How does this affect the struggles between SJ and Canon that were
talked about in InfoWorld and this group a few months ago?  Will the
factory be enough to buy off Canon so that NeXT can continue unimpeded?

Predictions?  NeXT'll have their own OEMed line of peecee clones, complete
with localbus video and (perhaps) DSP cards, in the near future.  If
we're all lucky, they'll also have an HP port done soon.

--
John Kuszewski
jo...@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu
I'm not an idiot, but I play one on USENET


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael Brill  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9 1993, 1:51 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: yi...@netcom.com (Michael Brill)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1993 18:51:13 GMT
Local: Tues, Feb 9 1993 1:51 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

>I heard on WTOP radio (Washington, DC) this morning that NeXT is getting      
>out of the hardware business and trying to sell its factory to Canon.
>Their story was based on a San Francisco Chronicle article.  Does anyone
>have the original?

The gist of the article title "Next Inc. to Drop Hardware - 300 losing
jobs in strategy shift":

* laying off 300 of 540 employees
* negotiating with Canon to sell manufacturing plant
* 69,300 workstations shipped last year (they meant _as of_ last year)
* analysts state public offering 18+ months away
* Official announcements will be made 2/16/93

Nothing else new, just garden variety "NeXTSTEP is good, hardware is not
so competitive," "NeXT is 2-3 years ahead of their competitors" and let
us not forget "NeXT will have a hard time competing because they're small."

Current equity breakdown:
* Jobs 46%
* Perot 11%
* Canon 17.9%
* Other (100 - 46 - 11 - 17.9)%

May I make a suggestion?  Nobody say "I told you so!"  Thanks! :)

...Michael Brill (yi...@netcom.com)

--
----


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Art Isbell  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9 1993, 4:02 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: isb...@cats.ucsc.edu (Art Isbell)
Date: 9 Feb 1993 21:02:46 GMT
Local: Tues, Feb 9 1993 4:02 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

Although NeXT's official word on its hardware future is not scheduled for
another week, I'd like to ENCOURAGE NeXT to make the announcement ASAP due to
the widespread leak.

While I agree with the move, I find the timing to be very bad.  My client's
first "go live" is scheduled for May on 5 NeXTstations.  Our customer isn't
happy about buying discontinued hardware (who would be ?-(  But we'll have no
alternative for him in May because NS-Intel will still be in beta.  So my
client could lose his first sale because of this which will make his survival
very difficult.  NeXT had better have a very convincing announcement VERY SOON.
--

Art Isbell                                                      Cubic Solutions
NeXT Registered Developer #745         NeXT software development and consulting
NeXTmail: isb...@cats.UCSC.EDU                             Voice: (408)335-1154
USmail: 95018-9442                                           Fax: (408)335-2515


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Art Isbell  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9 1993, 4:11 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: isb...@cats.ucsc.edu (Art Isbell)
Date: 9 Feb 1993 21:11:04 GMT
Local: Tues, Feb 9 1993 4:11 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

The Sun salespeople are already out trying to scare NeXT customers away from
NeXT.  We've received 2 calls today, one of them mentioning Bud Tribble (who's
now at Sun).  They're trying to convince us to abandon NeXTSTEP and go with
Solaris (boy, do they have a lot of convincing to do :-)  But for customers who
have taken a chance to go with NeXT and are nervous about having done so, Sun
may be able to scare them away from NeXT.  It's a nasty business out there.
--

Art Isbell                                                      Cubic Solutions
NeXT Registered Developer #745         NeXT software development and consulting
NeXTmail: isb...@cats.UCSC.EDU                             Voice: (408)335-1154
USmail: 95018-9442                                           Fax: (408)335-2515


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Vin Locke  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9 1993, 11:14 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: v...@netcom.com (Vin Locke)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1993 04:14:15 GMT
Local: Tues, Feb 9 1993 11:14 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

>> The Sun salespeople are already out trying to scare NeXT customers
>> away from NeXT.  We've received 2 calls today, one of them mentioning
>> Bud Tribble (who's now at Sun).  They're trying to convince us to
>> abandon NeXTSTEP and go with Solaris (boy, do they have a lot of
>> convincing to do :-)  But for customers who have taken a chance to
>> go with NeXT and are nervous about having done so, Sun may be able
>> to scare them away from NeXT.  It's a nasty business out there.

>If NeXT succeeds with NeXTSTEP on 486 & Pentium machines, I'd expect people  
>to be a lot less worried about going with NeXT then they were before.  If  
>they also have NeXTSTEP running on HP chips, it will be Sun who should be  
>the nervous one.  With NeXT running on 486's as the low end and HP-PA at the  
>high end, it'll be an awfully attractive system.

        Do people realize that as of this "no more hardware" leak,
NeXT no longer has a product?   NS 486, oh yeah.  er, when did they say it
would be out?

Also, NeXT, to make it as a software company, will have to have software to
sell.  I could see some pretty intersting discussion coming up on the
net . . .

                                         --vin
v...@netcom.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If productivity can really be measured as the rate at which lines of
code are produced, why not just use a tight loop to spew code as fast
as possible, and send the programmers home?
                                            --Brad Cox


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Garance A. Drosehn  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 5:44 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: g...@eclipse.its.rpi.edu (Garance A. Drosehn)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1993 23:30:34 GMT
Local: Tues, Feb 9 1993 6:30 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

isb...@cats.ucsc.edu (Art Isbell) writes:
> The Sun salespeople are already out trying to scare NeXT customers
> away from NeXT.  We've received 2 calls today, one of them mentioning
> Bud Tribble (who's now at Sun).  They're trying to convince us to
> abandon NeXTSTEP and go with Solaris (boy, do they have a lot of
> convincing to do :-)  But for customers who have taken a chance to
> go with NeXT and are nervous about having done so, Sun may be able
> to scare them away from NeXT.  It's a nasty business out there.

If NeXT succeeds with NeXTSTEP on 486 & Pentium machines, I'd expect people  
to be a lot less worried about going with NeXT then they were before.  If  
they also have NeXTSTEP running on HP chips, it will be Sun who should be  
the nervous one.  With NeXT running on 486's as the low end and HP-PA at the  
high end, it'll be an awfully attractive system.

Of course, it is certainly true that it's a nasty business out there...

--
Garance Alistair Drosehn     =     g...@eclipse.its.rpi.edu
ITS Systems Programmer            (handles NeXT-type mail)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;           Troy NY    USA


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Neil Greene  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 9:58 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: Neil Greene <n...@kynug.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1993 14:58:20 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 9:58 am
Subject: Re: no more hardware
In article <1l965mINN...@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> isb...@cats.ucsc.edu (Art  

VERY SOON.

Well said Art.  

It is hard to beat out some of the competing platforms and it will be real  
hard to beat them with discontinued hardware and only intel machines to  
sell.  Which turns us immediately into Gateway/Dell salesperson.  Now, of  
course I have been talking to Gateway for some time now in anticipation of  
any move. As a reseller, it places you in a holding pattern.

--
Neil Greene
President, Kentucky NeXT User Group, Inc.
Email: n...@kynug.org [NeXTMail]


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Stephen Rodgers  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 12:42 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jp...@macbeth.umd.edu (Robert Stephen Rodgers)
Date: 10 Feb 93 00:30:05 GMT
Local: Tues, Feb 9 1993 7:30 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

In article <1l96l8INN...@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> isb...@cats.ucsc.edu (Art Isbell) writes:

>The Sun salespeople are already out trying to scare NeXT customers away from
>NeXT.  We've received 2 calls today, one of them mentioning Bud Tribble (who's
>now at Sun).  They're trying to convince us to abandon NeXTSTEP and go with
>Solaris (boy, do they have a lot of convincing to do :-)  But for customers who

        Out of curiousity, I keep seeing posts regarding the alienation
        of users that Solaris is causing.  Anybody willing to send me
        email detailing why?  (Solaris hasn't gotten a lot of press--a
        bit of a dark horse--so I have no idea..)

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MATIS stephane  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 12:44 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: kgn...@cs.concordia.ca (MATIS stephane)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1993 13:26:31 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 8:26 am
Subject: Re: no more hardware

In article <justin.729319693@hp750> jus...@hp750.me.engr.uky.edu (Justin Sullivan) writes:

>RUN - don't walk - to your nearest HP representative. Don't let your NeXT
>do it: It crawls like a crippled sea slug. You'll be old and gray by the
>time it gets anything done.

        I usually stay out of these "mini" flames, but Justin, most of
us don't do "Computational Fluid Dynamics" or our NeXT.... and trully, a
HP 9000/750 is $$$ more than my lowlly NeXTstataion color.

        I'm sure my DSP can crank some horsepower ... but not for what
you have in mind.

        To each his own ... and honsetly ... the NeXT ain't a "slug".

>--
>* Justin P. Sullivan                * jus...@engr.uky.edu  (Internet) *
>* System Administrator              * jus...@mik.uky.edu   (NeXTMail) *
>* Computational Fluid Dynamics      * JUSTIN@UKCC            (BITNET) *
>* (606) 257-2268            * ukma!engr.uky.edu!justin (UUCP) *

+---------------------------------+   ___     ___       ___
| Stephane I. Matis               |  /   \_BATLLETECH  /\__\ Viva NeXT!
| E-Mail : kgn...@cs.concordia.ca |  \___/   \___/     \/__/ NeXTSTEP 3.0!
| "It Just Works..." - Steve Jobs |      \___/  
+---------------------------------+       Wolfnet Operative & NeXThead

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Justin Sullivan  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 12:45 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jus...@hp750.me.engr.uky.edu (Justin Sullivan)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1993 04:48:13 GMT
Local: Tues, Feb 9 1993 11:48 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware
jp...@macbeth.umd.edu (Robert Stephen Rodgers) writes:

>    Out of curiousity, I keep seeing posts regarding the alienation
>    of users that Solaris is causing.  Anybody willing to send me
>    email detailing why?  (Solaris hasn't gotten a lot of press--a
>    bit of a dark horse--so I have no idea..)

Over in the group of the One True Computing Platform (comp.sys.hp :), a fellow
just commented: "Sun really dropped the ball on that one.." referring to their
abandoning of their most precious creation: SunOS. He mentioned that he
really missed BSD4.3-based stuff, and let's face it.. Jumping from that
arena into SVR4 in less than a year is quite a step.

You're now going to have lots of people (misguided purists, hopeless academics
and lazy scientists) scratching their heads when they get a new SPARCstation
(10?) with Solaris 2.x preinstalled.. The local NeXTadmin spent over an hour
trying to figure out how to make a printing modification on this HP 9000/750.
It wouldn't have taken me ten seconds, but the point is that he was completely
unaccustomed to SVR4. He must have pulled his hair out when he didn't find
'lpd' running. Then he called it 'nonstandard.' <shaking head> Am I to blame
because he's been corrupted by a mangy little workstation? Has it come as a
surprise to everyone that their little black slabs are being orphaned by the
faltering company that created them?

RUN - don't walk - to your nearest HP representative. Don't let your NeXT
do it: It crawls like a crippled sea slug. You'll be old and gray by the
time it gets anything done.
--
* Justin P. Sullivan            * jus...@engr.uky.edu  (Internet) *
* System Administrator          * jus...@mik.uky.edu   (NeXTMail) *
* Computational Fluid Dynamics  * JUSTIN@UKCC            (BITNET) *
* (606) 257-2268                * ukma!engr.uky.edu!justin (UUCP) *


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael Brill  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 6:34 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: yi...@netcom.com (Michael Brill)
Date: 10 Feb 93 17:38:53 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware
[miscellaneous doom and gloom happily deleted]

Apart from the occasional "NeXT should only make X terminals" type comments,
it seems that the overwhelming view of csna has been that NeXT should drop
hardware and concentrate on making NeXTSTEP ubiquitous.  Hmmmm... lessee...
NeXT drops hardware and is concentrating on NeXTSTEP.  I expected to hear
the sound of champagne corks popping, not whines about the market value of
their slabs! :/

I, for one, am more optimistic than ever (and I've nothing vested in the
whole game).

BTW: from today's SF Chronicle (I don't subscribe, really!):
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Next Confirms Exit From Hardware
Next Computer Inc., of Redwood City, the computer-workstation company
founded by Apple Computer co-founder Steve Jobs, confirmed a report
in yesterday's Chronicle that it will sell its hardware business to Canon,
Inc., the Japanese electronics company [*not* the Indiana-based poultry
packer!].

Canon owns 17.9 percent of Next after investing $165 million over the past
five years.  Under the agreement, Canon will forgive Next's debt from a
$55 million credit line [thank you very much] that it negotiated last year.

Next, which employs 535 people, will lay off 280 workers outright.  Fifty-
five works will leave Next but may have an opportunity to join Canon, a
Next spokeswoman said.  Next, which will keep 200 workers, expects to
complete the transaction by May.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

...Michael Brill (yi...@netcom.com)

--
----


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "no more hardware (why the fuss?)" by Garance A. Drosehn
Garance A. Drosehn  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 8:30 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: g...@eclipse.its.rpi.edu (Garance A. Drosehn)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1993 20:47:43 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 3:47 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware (why the fuss?)

yi...@netcom.com (Michael Brill) writes:
> [miscellaneous doom and gloom happily deleted]

> Apart from the occasional "NeXT should only make X terminals" type
> comments, it seems that the overwhelming view of csna has been that
> NeXT should drop hardware and concentrate on making NeXTSTEP
> ubiquitous.  Hmmmm... lessee... NeXT drops hardware and is
> concentrating on NeXTSTEP.  I expected to hear the sound of
> champagne corks popping, not whines about the market value of
> their slabs! :/

> I, for one, am more optimistic than ever (and I've nothing vested
> in the whole game).

While this move is pretty much what many people have pestered NeXT to do,  
the timing of it is odd (to say the least).  If this happened after NS-Intel  
was a real, shipping product (and people were confident that it works as  
well or better than NS 3.0 on NeXT hardware), then this move would seem  
almost inevitable.

Doing it now when NS-Intel isn't a buyable product yet, and doing it after  
this "awful" hardware has just helped to give NeXT a profitable quarter,  
seems rather bizzare timing.  What, they couldn't stand to have two  
profitable quarters in a row or something?

The biggest problem with this is probably not the move itself, but  
opportunity it gives to a number of other companies to rush around and  
misrepresent what the story is.  Reading some of these accounts, one gets  
the impression that NeXT was never and could never produce competitive  
hardware.  That alone is not true.  When the 040 NeXTstations were  
introduced they were extremely good boxes for the $$$.

Most the articles are long on details on how the hardware is not competitive  
(which, at the moment, is true), and then toss in some little blurb saying  
"Oh yeah, the operating system is pretty nice".  This doesn't bother me  
personally, but I can see how the ratio of good news to bad news might make  
a number of NeXT corporate buyers a little uneasy.

--
Garance Alistair Drosehn     =     g...@eclipse.its.rpi.edu
ITS Systems Programmer            (handles NeXT-type mail)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;           Troy NY    USA

(I'm speaking as someone who *almost* bought a NeXTstation color turbo two  
weeks ago, but am now resigned to waiting for some Intel or (preferably)  
HP-based box to run NeXTstep on)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "no more hardware" by Coop
Coop  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 9:03 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: rpome...@aunext1.amd.com (Ron Pomeroy x(Coop))
Date: 10 Feb 93 16:57:24 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 11:57 am
Subject: Re: no more hardware
In article <C28Io7....@newsflash.concordia.ca> kgn...@cs.concordia.ca (MATIS  

Justin,

RUN - don't walk - to your nearest CRAY representative. Don't let your HP
do it: It crawls like a crippled sea slug. You'll be old and gray by the
time it gets anything done.

As Einstein said...It's all relative.

--
Ronald Pomeroy          "VisualWorks - the *only* real competition for IB"
Advanced Micro Devices
CAM Applications Group
rpome...@aunext1.amd.com
(NeXTmail preferred)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Don Yacktman  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 1993, 9:49 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: ya...@idaho.et.byu.edu (Don Yacktman)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 93 12:31:50 MST
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 2:31 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

In article <1993Feb10.173853.11...@netcom.com>, yi...@netcom.com (Michael Brill) writes:
>[miscellaneous doom and gloom happily deleted]

>Apart from the occasional "NeXT should only make X terminals" type comments,
>it seems that the overwhelming view of csna has been that NeXT should drop
>hardware and concentrate on making NeXTSTEP ubiquitous.  Hmmmm... lessee...
>NeXT drops hardware and is concentrating on NeXTSTEP.  I expected to hear
>the sound of champagne corks popping, not whines about the market value of
>their slabs! :/

I think the timing is perhaps the biggest problem.  At this point, it
would be silly to go and buy a NeXT, since it's to be discontinued.  But
there's no other way to get NeXTSTEP!  That means that until the 486 version
ships, the NeXTSTEP market _will_not_grow_!  If you're a small start up
software company hoping to make money off your products, this will not
make you happy.  It would have been much better (for the NeXT developer)
if the announcement were to come _after_ NS486 is on the shelves in the
local software store...  then there would be an alternative to move to!
I'll bet NeXT sales drop to near zero starting now and will stay that way
until NS486 has shipped.  And how much longer will it be delayed?  Perhaps
only way NeXT will be able to get any sales at all is to drop the
prices on the hardware.  (Can you say fire sale?)  If that happens, I'll
snap up a few slabs, though.  It's good hardware, and will be good
for several years.  At a reduced price...  well, everyone is this group
has been telling NeXT to drop their prices anyway.  Wish granted?  :-)

>I, for one, am more optimistic than ever (and I've nothing vested in the
>whole game).

I haven't lost a positive outlook, and I simply hope to high heaven that
somebody at NeXT knows what they're doing...perhaps there's a few hidden
factors that we aren't aware of that make this decision rosier than it
appears on the surface.  At any rate, I'm trying to speed up the projects
I'm working on for now...if NeXT does come out on top after this, I want to
be sure I'm there!  Let's also hope that the small start up software
companies survive the upcoming lack of sales which might (_might_ == NOT
guaranteed, but it wouldn't surprise me if it happened) happen.  Even if
NeXT survives, I would not want to see companies like Srone Design,
Lighthouse, and Right Brain disappear.  They are a much, much better
alternative to MicroSnot and Word(im)Perfect by a long shot!

Folks, let's lighten up a bit, "nightmare" or not!  If we look beyond
the next 6 months, things don't look quite so bad.

Well, gotta get to work. :-)

Later,
-Don Yacktman
ya...@alaska.et.byu.edu


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Yamanari  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 12:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: rsrod...@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1993 19:55:05 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 2:55 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

In article <5...@byu.edu> ya...@idaho.et.byu.edu (Don Yacktman) writes:

>I think the timing is perhaps the biggest problem.  At this point, it
>would be silly to go and buy a NeXT, since it's to be discontinued.  But
>there's no other way to get NeXTSTEP!  That means that until the 486 version

        At least this takes care of the Fatbinaries/cross-compiling
        thread quite nicely.  It's importance, in the light of NeXT's
        decision, is minor.

>local software store...  then there would be an alternative to move to!
>I'll bet NeXT sales drop to near zero starting now and will stay that way
>until NS486 has shipped.  And how much longer will it be delayed?  Perhaps
>only way NeXT will be able to get any sales at all is to drop the
>prices on the hardware.  (Can you say fire sale?)  If that happens, I'll

        Maybe we finally hit upon a strategy to get NeXT to maintain
        price parity with the rest of the industry.

> After the next 6 months, things should be looking up.

        Yep.  the price of a '486 machine should be down to about $1800
        for a nice one.  And the Pentium mightbe out.

--
    "The waste.. The waste sometimes brings tears to my eyes.  Just the
     thought that all of those animals are being put into garbage bags and
     thrown in lakes or dumpsters when they could be gloves or shoe laces,
     or feeding the homeless."  (kill file suggestion: "/ :rsrodger/h :j")


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hardy  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 6:20 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: ha...@golem.ps.uci.edu (Meinhard E. Mayer (Hardy))
Date: 10 Feb 93 22:48:49 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 5:48 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware
You should have shown him SAM, and taught him to  alias:
lprm -> cancel
lpq -> lpstat
lpr already exists as a script.
I used sam 36 times last week to set up the 36 incarnations of my NeXT
on SLIP (randomly assigned hostnames, every time I log in) to be able
to print on my NeXT_Printer from HP-UX.
I found HP-UX system administration completely painless -- about the
same as using Installer.app on the NeXT (provided you read the manual,
of course).
--
Hardy
-----
Meinhard E. Mayer,  Department of Physics, UC Irvine
e-mail: ha...@golem.ps.uci.edu (preferred) or MMA...@UCI.BITNET
!!!! NO NEXTMAIL TO THESE ADDRESSES, PLEASE !!!!!

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Coop  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 10:06 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: rpome...@aunext1.amd.com (Ron Pomeroy x(Coop))
Date: 11 Feb 93 15:06:31 GMT
Local: Thurs, Feb 11 1993 10:06 am
Subject: Re: no more hardware
In article <justin.729400080@hp750> jus...@hp750.me.engr.uky.edu (Justin  

Well, say what you will but every person in my office (with NeXTs) was offered  
an HP for his desk (to replace their turbo color slabs).  They *AL*L said "NO  
THANKS".  With Co-Xist I can tap the HP's cpu no trouble.  Heck, with Co-Xist  
my machine feels every bit as fast as running local on the HP.  Also, every  
person with an HP one his/her desk also has a Mac and or a PC on their desk.  
The NeXT users have one (granted - orphaned now) computer on their desk.  I  
will continue to be productive on my slab.

Now, as soon as I can have NeXTSTEP/HP I'll tell my boss I'll take that machine  
whenever he's ready!!

Cheers!
--
Ronald Pomeroy          "VisualWorks - the *only* real competition for IB"
Advanced Micro Devices
CAM Applications Group
rpome...@aunext1.amd.com
(NeXTmail preferred)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Justin Sullivan  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 10:46 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jus...@hp750.me.engr.uky.edu (Justin Sullivan)
Date: 11 Feb 93 03:02:08 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 10:02 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

kgn...@cs.concordia.ca (MATIS stephane) writes:
>    I usually stay out of these "mini" flames, but Justin, most of
>us don't do "Computational Fluid Dynamics" or our NeXT.... and trully, a
>HP 9000/750 is $$$ more than my lowlly NeXTstataion color.

Well, you get what you pay for.. And you got screwed. It would really piss me
off if the company that created the center of my life just pulled the rug
right out from under me. If no one has looked lately, that black slug of yours
has been quietly beaten by everthing that's new and in.

>    I'm sure my DSP can crank some horsepower ... but not for what

DSP wasn't put to very effective use, and it's a shame, but you won't get
a DSP on a stock 486.. Something else NeXT quit on? Perhaps they get their
new 'quitter' philosophy from a previous board member who goes by HRP..

--
* Justin P. Sullivan            * jus...@engr.uky.edu  (Internet) *
* System Administrator          * jus...@mik.uky.edu   (NeXTMail) *
* Computational Fluid Dynamics  * JUSTIN@UKCC            (BITNET) *
* (606) 257-2268                * ukma!engr.uky.edu!justin (UUCP) *


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Justin Sullivan  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 10:54 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jus...@hp750.me.engr.uky.edu (Justin Sullivan)
Date: 11 Feb 93 03:08:00 GMT
Subject: Re: no more hardware
rpome...@aunext1.amd.com (Ron Pomeroy x(Coop)) writes:

>RUN - don't walk - to your nearest CRAY representative. Don't let your HP
>do it: It crawls like a crippled sea slug. You'll be old and gray by the
>time it gets anything done.
>As Einstein said...It's all relative.

Considering that we have a respectable fraction of a Cray's performance at
a terrific fraction of the cost, and given that performance will more than
double when it's upgraded around March to a 755 for a pittance, I would
have to think that a Cray rep would try to sell me something I don't need
for a price that would bankrupt our already-bankrupt institution.
--
* Justin P. Sullivan            * jus...@engr.uky.edu  (Internet) *
* System Administrator          * jus...@mik.uky.edu   (NeXTMail) *
* Computational Fluid Dynamics  * JUSTIN@UKCC            (BITNET) *
* (606) 257-2268                * ukma!engr.uky.edu!justin (UUCP) *

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Gordon Van Huizen  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 12:41 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: g...@metrosoft.com (Gordon Van Huizen)
Date: 11 Feb 93 17:41:26 GMT
Local: Thurs, Feb 11 1993 12:41 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware
In article <1993Feb10.041415.10...@netcom.com> v...@netcom.com (Vin  
Locke) writes:
> Do people realize that as of this "no more hardware" leak,
> NeXT no longer has a product?   NS 486, oh yeah.  er, when did
> they say it would be out?

As someone who makes a living selling software products for the machine  
it has crossed my mind...

Also as a company who has spent a fair amount of time and money  
developing a software product that requires a NeXT box (not a PC  
running NeXTSTEP) we have had our fair share of interesting internal  
discussions over the last few days...

Gordon
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Van Huizen           vox: 619.488.9411  fax: 619.488.3045
Metrosoft                   g...@metrosoft.com [NeXTmail welcome]
----------------------------------------------------------------


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Barry Merriman  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 2:09 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: ba...@arnold.math.ucla.edu (Barry Merriman)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 93 01:20:25 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 8:20 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware
Essentially this would be a good thing: with NeXT
out of the HW biz, the other workstation manufactures would
not view them as a competitor, and would line up to license
NeXTSTEP.

Then we would have our real goal, which is to see NeXTSTEP
running all over the place.

--
Barry Merriman
UCLA Dept. of Math
UCLA Inst. for Fusion and Plasma Research
ba...@math.ucla.edu (Internet; NeXTMail is welcome)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nathan F. Janette  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 2:33 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: nat...@laplace.csb.yale.edu (Nathan F. Janette)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 07:07:39 GMT
Local: Thurs, Feb 11 1993 2:07 am
Subject: Re: no more hardware
In article <1993Feb11.012025.8...@math.ucla.edu>  

ba...@arnold.math.ucla.edu (Barry Merriman) writes:
> Essentially this would be a good thing: with NeXT
> out of the HW biz, the other workstation manufactures would
> not view them as a competitor, and would line up to license
> NeXTSTEP.

> Then we would have our real goal, which is to see NeXTSTEP
> running all over the place.

But for some (many?) of us, that wasnt' the *only* goal.

For all the pricing problems of NeXT hardware (thanks a lot
to all the NeXT "marketing" people), they built a good
machine that offered plenty of performance even when
compared to supposedly faster RISC systems. I was
personally attracted to the sharp 17" megapixel display,
and the keyboard and mouse.  I prefer them to any other
user-interface gear I've seen, and I've seen plenty.

I feel like a violinist that was just told that my favorite
strings and bow wouldn't be sold any more, but it was a good
thing because now I can play my music in more concert halls,
I just have to use rubber bands for strings and a baseball
bat for a bow.

I truly hope Canon will place it's name on the hardware line,
especially the almost-completed Power-PC machine, sell
them at competitive prices, and keep them painted BLACK.

--
Nathan Janette
PPP link from hilbert.csb.yale.edu

Please reply to: nat...@laplace.csb.yale.edu (NeXT)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael Brill  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 4:08 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: yi...@netcom.com (Michael Brill)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1993 21:47:59 GMT
Local: Wed, Feb 10 1993 4:47 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware

> ya...@idaho.et.byu.edu (Don Yacktman) writes
>I think the timing is perhaps the biggest problem.  At this point, it
>would be silly to go and buy a NeXT, since it's to be discontinued.  But
>there's no other way to get NeXTSTEP!  That means that until the 486 version
>ships, the NeXTSTEP market _will_not_grow_!

Agreed.  Timing isn't great - say about a week too early.  I had it
that NeXT planned a slew of announcements for February 16th including
the status of hardware, strategic alliances, etc.  Given the fact that
they're not hemoraging cash (attaining profitability last quarter), I
find it hard to believe that there isn't a good reason for making the
announcement now (er, the 16th).  My guess is that there is a whole lot of
very positive news vis-a-vis strategic h/w alliances (HP beyond rumor stage,
McNealy seen by several folks at NeXT last week) and this is a good time to
announce the complete restructuring.  So, the net effect of the announcements
is that NeXT is truly becoming a s/w company and has signed up h/w vendors and
*SOLD* [_not_ just dumping] off their h/w division.  I think timing is truly
unfortunate to have the only perceivable (to some) bad news being announced by
itself.  I also thing it would be a rather grusome event to have NeXT announce
that it's dropping h/w in the middle of NWE!  Note that this is speculation...
reasonably well-informed speculation, but speculation nonetheless.

>If you're a small start up
>software company hoping to make money off your products, this will not
>make you happy.  It would have been much better (for the NeXT developer)
>if the announcement were to come _after_ NS486 is on the shelves in the
>local software store...  then there would be an alternative to move to!

Yeah, I think that the news for immediately increasing market size is not
promising.  Let's say sales drop by 75% until NWE... that's what... maybe
5,000 machines.  I don't think that'll tank any s/w companies given the
fact that most of them are doing custom development anyway.  I think if
anything, this will give the supply of able NeXTSTEP programmers a chance
to catch up with the great demand! :) :)  The upside for s/w developers is
that there is now a 100% focus on making NeXTSTEP run on many platforms
which has orders of magnitude more impact than NeXT hanging on to h/w for
a few more months.

>Perhaps only way NeXT will be able to get any sales at all is to drop the
>prices on the hardware.  (Can you say fire sale?)  If that happens, I'll      
>snap up a few slabs, though.  It's good hardware, and will be good
>for several years.  At a reduced price...  well, everyone is this group
>has been telling NeXT to drop their prices anyway.  Wish granted?  :-)

They probably don't need all of the _used_ machines they have, so maybe
those will go away.  New machines... I don't think they have warehouses
full of them, but the ones they do have might be going with Canon?

>At any rate, I'm trying to speed up the projects
>I'm working on for now...if NeXT does come out on top after this, I want to
>be sure I'm there!

Change is odd.  It's something that everyone clamors for and when it happens
it really scares people.  This is change.  If you keep your eyes open and stay
the course... who knows, you could be the next MicroSnot!

...Michael Brill (yi...@netcom.com)

BTW, anyone want to buy a slightly used ColorStation?  <just kidding>

--
----


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "There IS hardware until May (was Re: no more hardware (why the fuss?))" by Peter Karbaliotis
Peter Karbaliotis  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 4:30 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: pe...@beast.math.ualberta.ca (Peter Karbaliotis)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 21:30:41 GMT
Local: Thurs, Feb 11 1993 4:30 pm
Subject: There IS hardware until May (was Re: no more hardware (why the fuss?))
In article <c663...@rpi.edu> g...@eclipse.its.rpi.edu (Garance A. Drosehn)  
writes:
[munch]

>While this move is pretty much what many people have pestered NeXT to do,  
>the timing of it is odd (to say the least).  If this happened after  
NS-Intel  
>was a real, shipping product (and people were confident that it works as  
>well or better than NS 3.0 on NeXT hardware), then this move would seem  
>almost inevitable.

[munch]

The timing is odd because the story was leaked. :-)

As a matter of fact,  NeXT is still making their computers.
They will be filling back-orders for black boxes until May 25th
(is that date a coincidence or what? :-).

Canon has not said anything about what they are going to do.
There will probably make some statement next week.

For those who are worried that they suddenly have a black
paperweight on their desk, take it easy.  NeXT will NOT drop
software support for their hardware for quite some time yet.
According to a UPI news item on ClariNet, NeXT sold about 69,000
units in 1992.  Together with previous years, there are probably
about 90,000 NeXT computers out there.  It would be complete
madness to abandon that many users.

Take a deep breath.  Exhale slowly.  Repeat as necessary.
Feel better?
:-)

--
Peter Karbaliotis - pe...@beast.math.ualberta.ca - NeXTmail ok
When a particle you don't even know gives you momentum, that's impulse.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "no more hardware" by Henry McGilton
Henry McGilton  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11 1993, 9:48 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: he...@trilithon.mpk.ca.us (Henry McGilton)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 23:28:45 GMT
Local: Thurs, Feb 11 1993 6:28 pm
Subject: Re: no more hardware
In article <1993Feb10.173853.11...@netcom.com> yi...@netcom.com (Michael Brill)  
writes:
    *  [miscellaneous doom and gloom happily deleted]

    *  Apart from the occasional "NeXT should only make X terminals"
    *  type comments, it seems that the overwhelming view of csna
    *  has been that NeXT should drop hardware and concentrate on
    *  making NeXTSTEP ubiquitous.

    *  Hmmmm... lessee...  NeXT drops hardware and IS concentrating
    *  on NeXTSTEP.  I expected to hear the sound of champagne
    *  corks popping, not whines about the market value of their slabs!
    *  
    *  I, for one, am more optimistic than ever (and I've nothing
    *  vested in the whole game).
Well said Mike.  We had a talk about this yesterday.  We decided
to keep our heads down and continue working on the stuff on which
we're working.  To let events such as these jerk us around now is
foolish.  As I said to a friend this morning:

  ``NeXT have pulled the plug on the hardware line, and announced
    they're now a software only company, with their value added
    being NeXTSTEP, Object Oriented development, and Display
    PostScript.  We decided not to let this sea change deflect us,
    since we're writing to a software platform that won't change,
    as opposed to a specific machine (amazing how many people can't
    figure this out).

    They have NeXTSTEP running on the 486 and the Pentium.  Market
    watchers estimate Intel will sell 23 million Pentium chips in
    the first year.  Assume NeXTSTEP appears on only one percent
    of those Pentium chips -- that's 230,000 systems, for a market
    four times bigger than NeXT's current installed base.''

        ........  Henry


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 52   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »