Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Google's new 3D Maps destroy Manhattan in the wake of Apple's Flyover

7 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Alan Browne

unread,
May 22, 2013, 8:54:35 PM5/22/13
to
On 2013.05.22 20:28 , Michelle Steiner wrote:
> <http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/05/22/googles-new-3d-maps-destroy-manha
> ttan-in-the-wake-of-apples-flyover>
>
> Wednesday, May 22, 2013, 06:05 pm
> By Daniel Eran Dilger
> Nearly a year after Apple introduced its own Maps service in iOS 6 with
> Flyover 3D satellite views, Google is expanding its own online Maps to
> support similar 3D satellite imagery, with the same sorts of buckled roads
> and visual distortions Apple was castigated for last summer.
>
>
> Introducing the new Google Maps with 3D
> <http://photos.appleinsider.com/GoogleMaps3d.0.052213.jpg>
>
> Unlike Apple's iOS 6 Maps, which target relatively low powered mobile
> devices, the new 3D features in Google Maps that were introduced last week
> require a modern PC running a web browser with a supported version of WebGL
> hardware accelerated rendering.
>
> That limits Google Maps' photorealistic 3D features to users of Chrome or
> Firefox on a Mac or Windows PC. Mobile users will have to settle for grey
> 3D building models or use the increasingly outdated Google Earth, which
> unlike Apple Maps' Flyover feature, is not integrated with the search and
> directions of Google's mobile Maps apps.

Oh <yawn>. On my mobile all I want is the fricken map and _maybe_ a
satellite view from time to time.

And on my mobile the most useful feature is search when I'm in a new
city and looking for something particular.


--
"A Canadian is someone who knows how to have sex in a canoe."
-Pierre Berton

JF Mezei

unread,
May 22, 2013, 9:50:33 PM5/22/13
to
On 13-05-22 20:54, Alan Browne wrote:

> Oh <yawn>. On my mobile all I want is the fricken map and _maybe_ a
> satellite view from time to time.

On mobile, I woudl want bigger text fonts for street names so I can read
them while moving or on a bumpy bus.


Message has been deleted

JF Mezei

unread,
May 22, 2013, 10:05:03 PM5/22/13
to
On 13-05-22 21:51, Michelle Steiner wrote:

> <yawn> when Google does it; incensed outraged when Apple does it.

Google gets into the eye candy after having built pretty solid core
mapping database.

Apple went into eye candy before having solid core mapping database.

Alan Browne

unread,
May 23, 2013, 4:52:36 PM5/23/13
to
On 2013.05.22 21:51 , Michelle Steiner wrote:
> In article <pdGdnXQSK5hW9QDM...@giganews.com>,
> Alan Browne <alan....@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>> Oh <yawn>. On my mobile all I want is the fricken map and _maybe_ a
>> satellite view from time to time.
>
> <yawn> when Google does it; incensed outraged when Apple does it.

The point with Apple was not what they did (that looked very slick and
nice) but that it contained so many inaccuracies and that it _replaced_
Google Maps in that iOS release leaving people without the tried and
(mostly) true.

I just got access to the new Google Maps (web) and the building
rendering is not very good at all IMO. It sort of works but there is a
medium distance where buildings look really strange and blobby
(unfinished in their "conversion" from a 2D photo from the top into the
3D rendering).

Not impressed with it at all. But the old Google Maps is still there.

Jolly Roger

unread,
May 23, 2013, 5:27:12 PM5/23/13
to
In article <pdGdnXQSK5hW9QDM...@giganews.com>,
Alan Browne <alan....@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:

People making such statements during the Apple 3D maps fiasco were
labelled "fanbois", if I remember correctly.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR

Jolly Roger

unread,
May 23, 2013, 5:28:12 PM5/23/13
to
In article <michelle-966F49...@news.eternal-september.org>,
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <pdGdnXQSK5hW9QDM...@giganews.com>,
> Alan Browne <alan....@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote:
>
> > Oh <yawn>. On my mobile all I want is the fricken map and _maybe_ a
> > satellite view from time to time.
>
> <yawn> when Google does it; incensed outraged when Apple does it.

double standard

Jolly Roger

unread,
May 23, 2013, 5:29:00 PM5/23/13
to
In article <519d7950$0$55126$c3e8da3$e408...@news.astraweb.com>,
JF Mezei <jfmezei...@vaxination.ca> wrote:

> On 13-05-22 21:51, Michelle Steiner wrote:
>
> > <yawn> when Google does it; incensed outraged when Apple does it.
>
> Google gets into the eye candy after having built pretty solid core
> mapping database.

wavey roads and all

Alan Browne

unread,
May 23, 2013, 5:31:35 PM5/23/13
to
On 2013.05.23 17:27 , Jolly Roger wrote:

> People making such statements during the Apple 3D maps fiasco were
> labelled "fanbois", if I remember correctly.

See my other reply to Michelle.
0 new messages