Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
DiskWarrior and other good disk utilities under Mac OS X 10.5.8?
302 views
Skip to first unread message
Ant
Oct 17, 2011, 4:17:20 AM10/17/11
to
Hello all.
What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is
that true?
Thank you in advance. :)
--
"It is not enough to be industrious; so are the ants. What are you
industrious about?" --Henry David Thoreau
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is
that true?
Thank you in advance. :)
--
"It is not enough to be industrious; so are the ants. What are you
industrious about?" --Henry David Thoreau
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
Rod Speed
Oct 17, 2011, 4:35:38 AM10/17/11
to
Ant wrote
> Hello all.
All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
smartctl
> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
Nope.
> Thank you in advance. :)
Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
> Hello all.
All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
> Thank you in advance. :)
Ant
Oct 17, 2011, 5:00:34 AM10/17/11
to
On 10/17/2011 1:35 AM PT, Rod Speed typed:
> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
So?
>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
>
> smartctl
I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink is the
only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download and run
without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
>
> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode that
found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but with a
folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am trying to
figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
>
> Nope.
OK.
>> Thank you in advance. :)
>
> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
I am not a boy or a human! :P
--
"Ah. Those club kids did eat those ants up like popcorn." --CSI: Miami
(Wannabe episode; #218)
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
>
> smartctl
only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download and run
without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
>
> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode that
found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but with a
folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am trying to
figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
>
> Nope.
>> Thank you in advance. :)
>
> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
--
"Ah. Those club kids did eat those ants up like popcorn." --CSI: Miami
(Wannabe episode; #218)
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
David Empson
Oct 17, 2011, 5:38:31 AM10/17/11
to
[Followups limited to the Mac group as not particularly relevant to the
others.]
Ant <a...@zimage.comANT> wrote:
> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
> surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is
> that true?
DiskWarrior is a one trick pony, but it does that one trick very well.
Its only function is to rebuild the directory on a drive, and optimize
it in the process. In that respect it can do a better job than Disk
Utility's "Repair Disk" feature, which refuses to fix complex problems
(or the command line "fsck" tool, which is the same thing as a Disk
Utilty "Repair Disk").
A nice feature of DiskWarrior is that it can mount a read-only copy of
the repaired volume so you can examine it before committing the changes
to disk.
DiskWarrior does very little to help with physical drive defects. It
will warn you about a suspected faulty drive if it is taking too long to
read during its analysis, but it does not have an explicit surface scan.
If I think a drive has bad sectors, I've used TechTool Pro to do a
surface scan. Version 5 or later can apparently report which file is
using a sector which it discovers to be bad, but I've never seen that as
I haven't found any bad sectors since I got version 5.
TechTool Pro can also repair directories, but I have never tried that
function as I'd always prefer DiskWarrior due to its nondestructive
trial repair.
--
David Empson
dem...@actrix.gen.nz
others.]
Ant <a...@zimage.comANT> wrote:
> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
> surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is
> that true?
Its only function is to rebuild the directory on a drive, and optimize
it in the process. In that respect it can do a better job than Disk
Utility's "Repair Disk" feature, which refuses to fix complex problems
(or the command line "fsck" tool, which is the same thing as a Disk
Utilty "Repair Disk").
A nice feature of DiskWarrior is that it can mount a read-only copy of
the repaired volume so you can examine it before committing the changes
to disk.
DiskWarrior does very little to help with physical drive defects. It
will warn you about a suspected faulty drive if it is taking too long to
read during its analysis, but it does not have an explicit surface scan.
If I think a drive has bad sectors, I've used TechTool Pro to do a
surface scan. Version 5 or later can apparently report which file is
using a sector which it discovers to be bad, but I've never seen that as
I haven't found any bad sectors since I got version 5.
TechTool Pro can also repair directories, but I have never tried that
function as I'd always prefer DiskWarrior due to its nondestructive
trial repair.
--
David Empson
dem...@actrix.gen.nz
Jolly Roger
Oct 17, 2011, 8:26:08 AM10/17/11
to
In article <AoednRRGeLISeQbT...@earthlink.com>,
additional disk repair utilities, when restoring from backup is so easy
and fast.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
Ant <a...@zimage.comANT> wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
> surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is
> that true?
>
> Thank you in advance. :)
I personally don't see the point in spending the money on such
> Hello all.
>
> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
> surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is
> that true?
>
> Thank you in advance. :)
additional disk repair utilities, when restoring from backup is so easy
and fast.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
Rod Speed
Oct 17, 2011, 2:06:36 PM10/17/11
to
Ant wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Ant wrote
>>> Hello all.
>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
> So?
So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
Its too dead to notice now.
>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
>> smartctl
> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink is the only option which I want to avoid. I just
> want to download and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
Havent tried that, should be feasible tho.
>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
>> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
OK, I assumed you were talking about the hardware, not the file structures.
> I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode
> that found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but
> with a folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am
> trying to figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
smartctl will tell you if it is or not.
> http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
>>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
>> Nope.
That was a comment about physical hard drives, not file structures.
> OK.
>>> Thank you in advance. :)
>> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
> I am not a boy or a human! :P
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, boy.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Ant wrote
>>> Hello all.
>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
> So?
Its too dead to notice now.
>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
>> smartctl
> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink is the only option which I want to avoid. I just
> want to download and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
>> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
> I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode
> that found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but
> with a folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am
> trying to figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
> http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
>>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
>> Nope.
> OK.
>>> Thank you in advance. :)
>> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
> I am not a boy or a human! :P
Erik Richard Sørensen
Oct 17, 2011, 5:40:43 PM10/17/11
to
Ant wrote:
> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
> surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is
> that true?
tool to fix problems with the HDs. If it's data recovery alone,
DataRescue 3 from ProSoft is the best tool.
http://www.prosofteng.com/products/data_rescue.php
Cheers, Erik Richard
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC, <mac-m...@Mstofanet.dk>
NisusWriter - The Future In Multilingual Text Processing - www.nisus.com
OpenOffice.org - The Modern Productivity Solution - www.openoffice.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your Name
Oct 17, 2011, 8:17:37 PM10/17/11
to
In article <4e9ca0db$0$287$1472...@news.sunsite.dk>,
> > What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs=
> ?=20
> > It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with=20
> > surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is=
> =20
> > that true?
>
> As you write in the subject. - DiskWarrior ver. 4.2 or newer is the best =
>
> tool to fix problems with the HDs. If it's data recovery alone,=20
the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files / fix a disk
with an older version of the utility software on a newer version of Mac OS
X can cause even more problems.
> > What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs=
> ?=20
> > It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with=20
> > surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is=
> =20
> > that true?
>
> As you write in the subject. - DiskWarrior ver. 4.2 or newer is the best =
>
> tool to fix problems with the HDs. If it's data recovery alone,=20
> DataRescue 3 from ProSoft is the best tool.
>
> http://www.prosofteng.com/products/data_rescue.php
>
> Cheers, Erik Richard
Whatever you use, you need to make sure you have the version designed for
>
> http://www.prosofteng.com/products/data_rescue.php
>
> Cheers, Erik Richard
the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files / fix a disk
with an older version of the utility software on a newer version of Mac OS
X can cause even more problems.
Ant
Oct 17, 2011, 9:37:27 PM10/17/11
to
On Oct 17, 5:17 pm, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
> Whatever you use, you need to make sure you have the version designed for
> the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files / fix a disk
> with an older version of the utility software on a newer version of Mac OS
> X can cause even more problems.
Ah, then it would be Mac OS X 10.5.8. I'd assume newer disk utility
> Whatever you use, you need to make sure you have the version designed for
> the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files / fix a disk
> with an older version of the utility software on a newer version of Mac OS
> X can cause even more problems.
versions would be backward compatible with older Mac OS X versions.
Ant
Oct 17, 2011, 9:41:25 PM10/17/11
to
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ant wrote
> > Rod Speed wrote
> >> Ant wrote
> >>> Hello all.
> >> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
> > So?
> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
> Its too dead to notice now.
So I am a zombie?
> Ant wrote
> > Rod Speed wrote
> >> Ant wrote
> >>> Hello all.
> >> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
> > So?
> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
> Its too dead to notice now.
> >>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> >> smartctl
> > I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink is the only option which I want to avoid. I just
> > want to download and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
> Havent tried that, should be feasible tho.
download and run.
> >>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
> >> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
> > Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
> > folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
> > deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
> OK, I assumed you were talking about the hardware, not the file structures.
Utilities find problems and sometimes unable to fix them.
> > I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode
> > that found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but
> > with a folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am
> > trying to figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
> smartctl will tell you if it is or not.
> > http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
> >>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
> >> Nope.
> That was a comment about physical hard drives, not file structures.
> > OK.
> >>> Thank you in advance. :)
> >> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
> > I am not a boy or a human! :P
> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, boy.
--
Quote of the Week: "Where there is sugar, there are bound to be ants." --Malay Proverb
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail. If crediting,
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
( ) then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
Erik Richard Sørensen
Oct 17, 2011, 10:36:24 PM10/17/11
to
Your Name wrote:
> Erik Richard Sørensen wrote:
>> Ant wrote:
>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for
>>> problematic HDDs.
>> Ant wrote:
>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for
>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are
>>> limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc. I was told
>>> DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
>>
>> As you write in the subject. - DiskWarrior ver. 4.2 or newer
>> is the best tool to fix problems with the HDs. If it's data
>> As you write in the subject. - DiskWarrior ver. 4.2 or newer
>> recovery alone, DataRescue 3 from ProSoft is the best tool.
>>
>> http://www.prosofteng.com/products/data_rescue.php
>
> Whatever you use, you need to make sure you have the version designed for
> the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files / fix a disk
> with an older version of the utility software on a newer version of Mac OS
> X can cause even more problems.
DiskWarrior 4.2 can be used with any system prior to and included 10.5.x.
> the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files / fix a disk
> with an older version of the utility software on a newer version of Mac OS
> X can cause even more problems.
Diskwarrior 4.3 can be used with any system prior to and included 10.6.x.
- I haven't looked for any updates to 10.7, since I donot use that piece
of software on any machine and probably never will. - You can even use
DW 4.2.x on machines running 10.4 with classic envirement installed...
Latest version of DataRescue 3 is usable with any system up to and
included 10.7.x.
Erik Richard Sørensen
Oct 17, 2011, 10:38:01 PM10/17/11
to
Kevin McMurtrie
Oct 17, 2011, 10:50:34 PM10/17/11
to
In article <9uidnY9EWcskcwbT...@earthlink.com>,
Several people will chime in with "works for me" but I had it happen
regularly on three different machines having heavy concurrent filesystem
usage. One was bare-bones with nothing at all to cause conflicts.
I don't know of a fix except upgrading to at least 10.6 or running fsck
monthly to keep damage to a minimum.
A failing disk, if that's the problem, should generate warnings in
kernel.log.
>
> >> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
> >
> > Nope.
>
> OK.
>
>
> >> Thank you in advance. :)
> >
> > Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
>
> I am not a boy or a human! :P
--
I will not see posts from Google because I must filter them as spam
Ant <a...@zimage.comANT> wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 1:35 AM PT, Rod Speed typed:
>
> > All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>
> So?
>
>
> >> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> >
> > smartctl
>
> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink is the
> only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download and run
> without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>
>
> >> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface
> >> scan, SMART stuff, etc.
> >
> > You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
>
> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
> I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode that
> found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but with a
> folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am trying to
> figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
>
> http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
That looks like HFS+ corruption that I regularly saw before 10.6.
> On 10/17/2011 1:35 AM PT, Rod Speed typed:
>
> > All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>
> So?
>
>
> >> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> >
> > smartctl
>
> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink is the
> only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download and run
> without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>
>
> >> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with surface
> >> scan, SMART stuff, etc.
> >
> > You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
>
> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
> I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode that
> found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but with a
> folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am trying to
> figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
>
> http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
Several people will chime in with "works for me" but I had it happen
regularly on three different machines having heavy concurrent filesystem
usage. One was bare-bones with nothing at all to cause conflicts.
I don't know of a fix except upgrading to at least 10.6 or running fsck
monthly to keep damage to a minimum.
A failing disk, if that's the problem, should generate warnings in
kernel.log.
>
> >> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
> >
> > Nope.
>
> OK.
>
>
> >> Thank you in advance. :)
> >
> > Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
>
> I am not a boy or a human! :P
--
Your Name
Oct 17, 2011, 11:15:35 PM10/17/11
to
In article <4e9ce689$0$294$1472...@news.sunsite.dk>,
check the specs before using / buying it.
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_Richard_S=F8rensen?= <tu...@tulle.dk> wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> > On Oct 17, 5:17 pm, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
> >>
> >> Whatever you use, you need to make sure you have the version designed
> >> for the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files /
> >> fix a disk with an older version of the utility software on a newer
> >> version of Mac OS X can cause even more problems.
> >
> > Ah, then it would be Mac OS X 10.5.8. I'd assume newer disk utility
> > versions would be backward compatible with older Mac OS X versions.
>
> Indeed they are!
They should be (within reason), and usually they are, but always best to
> Ant wrote:
> > On Oct 17, 5:17 pm, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
> >>
> >> Whatever you use, you need to make sure you have the version designed
> >> for the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files /
> >> fix a disk with an older version of the utility software on a newer
> >> version of Mac OS X can cause even more problems.
> >
> > Ah, then it would be Mac OS X 10.5.8. I'd assume newer disk utility
> > versions would be backward compatible with older Mac OS X versions.
>
> Indeed they are!
check the specs before using / buying it.
Your Name
Oct 17, 2011, 11:16:02 PM10/17/11
to
In article <4e9ce689$0$294$1472...@news.sunsite.dk>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_Richard_S=F8rensen?= <tu...@tulle.dk> wrote:
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_Richard_S=F8rensen?= <tu...@tulle.dk> wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> > On Oct 17, 5:17 pm, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
> >>
> >> Whatever you use, you need to make sure you have the version designed
> >> for the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files /
> >> fix a disk with an older version of the utility software on a newer
> >> version of Mac OS X can cause even more problems.
> >
> > Ah, then it would be Mac OS X 10.5.8. I'd assume newer disk utility
> > versions would be backward compatible with older Mac OS X versions.
>
> Indeed they are!
> > On Oct 17, 5:17 pm, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
> >>
> >> Whatever you use, you need to make sure you have the version designed
> >> for the version of Mac OS X you're using. Trying to recover files /
> >> fix a disk with an older version of the utility software on a newer
> >> version of Mac OS X can cause even more problems.
> >
> > Ah, then it would be Mac OS X 10.5.8. I'd assume newer disk utility
> > versions would be backward compatible with older Mac OS X versions.
>
> Indeed they are!
They should be (within reason), and usually they are, but always best to
check the specs before using / buying it ... and remember to update it to
get the latest bug fixes.
Rod Speed
Oct 18, 2011, 12:03:26 AM10/18/11
to
Ant wrote
You into necrophilia too ?
>>>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
>>>> smartctl
>>> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink
>>> is the only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download
>>> and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>> Havent tried that, should be feasible tho.
> I am surprised there isn't a binary native Mac version of smartctl to download and run.
Presumably the normal one works fine.
>>>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
>>>>> surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
>>>> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
>>> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
>>> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
>>> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
>> OK, I assumed you were talking about the hardware, not the file structures.
> Well, I am not sure. Maybe the hardware is failing to make
> Disk Utilities find problems and sometimes unable to fix them.
You can just put the hard drive in something else and check its smart stats that way.
>>> I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode
>>> that found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but
>>> with a folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am
>>> trying to figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
>> smartctl will tell you if it is or not.
>>> http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
>>>>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
>>>> Nope.
>> That was a comment about physical hard drives, not file structures.
>>> OK.
>>>>> Thank you in advance. :)
>>>> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
>>> I am not a boy or a human! :P
>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, boy.
> Again, not a boy but a worker ant (females). :P
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote
>> Ant wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Ant wrote
>>>>> Hello all.
>>>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>>> So?
>> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
>> Its too dead to notice now.
> So I am a zombie?
Nope, just a drug crazed cripple that talks to corpses.
>> Ant wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Ant wrote
>>>>> Hello all.
>>>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>>> So?
>> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
>> Its too dead to notice now.
> So I am a zombie?
You into necrophilia too ?
>>>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
>>>> smartctl
>>> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink
>>> is the only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download
>>> and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>> Havent tried that, should be feasible tho.
> I am surprised there isn't a binary native Mac version of smartctl to download and run.
>>>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
>>>>> surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
>>>> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
>>> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
>>> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
>>> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
>> OK, I assumed you were talking about the hardware, not the file structures.
> Well, I am not sure. Maybe the hardware is failing to make
> Disk Utilities find problems and sometimes unable to fix them.
>>> I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode
>>> that found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but
>>> with a folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am
>>> trying to figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
>> smartctl will tell you if it is or not.
>>> http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
>>>>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
>>>> Nope.
>> That was a comment about physical hard drives, not file structures.
>>> OK.
>>>>> Thank you in advance. :)
>>>> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
>>> I am not a boy or a human! :P
>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, boy.
> Again, not a boy but a worker ant (females). :P
Ant
Oct 18, 2011, 2:22:42 PM10/18/11
to
> >>>>> Hello all.
> >>>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
> >>> So?
> >> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
> >> Its too dead to notice now.
> > So I am a zombie?
> Nope, just a drug crazed cripple that talks to corpses.
So, you're a corpse? I don't take drugs. "Drugs are bad, mmkay?" "Just
> >>>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
> >>> So?
> >> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
> >> Its too dead to notice now.
> > So I am a zombie?
> Nope, just a drug crazed cripple that talks to corpses.
say no to drugs."
> You into necrophilia too ?
> >>>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> >>>> smartctl
> >>> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink
> >>> is the only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download
> >>> and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
> >> Havent tried that, should be feasible tho.
> > I am surprised there isn't a binary native Mac version of smartctl to download and run.
> Presumably the normal one works fine.
says I have to get v5.40-x from
http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/smartmontools or
http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/sysutils/smartmontools/Portfile
or http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/gsmartcontrol (from
http://gsmartcontrol.berlios.de/home/index.php/en/Downloads).
> >>>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities are limited with
> >>>>> surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
> >>>> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
> >>> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
> >>> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
> >>> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
> >> OK, I assumed you were talking about the hardware, not the file structures.
> > Well, I am not sure. Maybe the hardware is failing to make
> > Disk Utilities find problems and sometimes unable to fix them.
> You can just put the hard drive in something else and check its smart stats that way.
uses HFS IIRC.
> >>> I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode
> >>> that found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but
> >>> with a folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am
> >>> trying to figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
> >> smartctl will tell you if it is or not.
> >>> http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
> >>>>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
> >>>> Nope.
> >> That was a comment about physical hard drives, not file structures.
> >>> OK.
> >>>>> Thank you in advance. :)
> >>>> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
> >>> I am not a boy or a human! :P
> >> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, boy.
> > Again, not a boy but a worker ant (females). :P
> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
Ant
Oct 18, 2011, 2:24:28 PM10/18/11
to
> DiskWarrior 4.2 can be used with any system prior to and included 10.5.x.
> Diskwarrior 4.3 can be used with any system prior to and included 10.6.x.
> - I haven't looked for any updates to 10.7, since I donot use that piece
> of software on any machine and probably never will. - You can even use
> DW 4.2.x on machines running 10.4 with classic envirement installed...
> Latest version of DataRescue 3 is usable with any system up to and
> included 10.7.x.
Thanks Erik! :)
> Diskwarrior 4.3 can be used with any system prior to and included 10.6.x.
> - I haven't looked for any updates to 10.7, since I donot use that piece
> of software on any machine and probably never will. - You can even use
> DW 4.2.x on machines running 10.4 with classic envirement installed...
> Latest version of DataRescue 3 is usable with any system up to and
> included 10.7.x.
--
Quote of the Week: "Where there is sugar, there are bound to be ants." --Malay Proverb
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
Quote of the Week: "Where there is sugar, there are bound to be ants." --Malay Proverb
\ _ / Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail. If crediting,
( ) then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
Rod Speed
Oct 18, 2011, 7:57:36 PM10/18/11
to
>>>>>>> Hello all.
>>>>>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>>>>> So?
>>>> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
>>>> Its too dead to notice now.
>>> So I am a zombie?
>> Nope, just a drug crazed cripple that talks to corpses.
> So, you're a corpse?
Nope.
>>>>>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>>>>> So?
>>>> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
>>>> Its too dead to notice now.
>>> So I am a zombie?
>> Nope, just a drug crazed cripple that talks to corpses.
> So, you're a corpse?
> I don't take drugs.
> "Drugs are bad, mmkay?" "Just say no to drugs."
>> You into necrophilia too ?
> Nope.
>>>>>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
>>>>>> smartctl
>>>>> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink
>>>>> is the only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download
>>>>> and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>>>> Havent tried that, should be feasible tho.
>>> I am surprised there isn't a binary native Mac version of smartctl to download and run.
>> Presumably the normal one works fine.
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/smartmontools/wiki/Download#Installprecompiledpackage
> says I have to get v5.40-x from
> http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/smartmontools or
> http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/sysutils/smartmontools/Portfile
> or http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/gsmartcontrol (from
> http://gsmartcontrol.berlios.de/home/index.php/en/Downloads).
>>>>>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities
>>>>>>> are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
>>>>>> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
>>>>> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
>>>>> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
>>>>> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
>>>> OK, I assumed you were talking about the hardware, not the file structures.
>>> Well, I am not sure. Maybe the hardware is failing to make
>>> Disk Utilities find problems and sometimes unable to fix them.
>> You can just put the hard drive in something else and check its smart stats that way.
> Even in PCs?
> Don't they have to read the file systems (FS)?
> Mac OS X uses HFS IIRC.
>>>>> I could rename/move it easily though. I ran fsck in single mode
>>>>> that found and fixed the problems. Then, the next thing again but
>>>>> with a folder/directory (one missing) and again with /net. I am
>>>>> trying to figure out if this 3+ years old HDD is going bad or not.
>>>> smartctl will tell you if it is or not.
>>>>> http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
>>>>>>> I was told DiskWarrior is very good. Is that true?
>>>>>> Nope.
>>>> That was a comment about physical hard drives, not file structures.
>>>>> OK.
>>>>>>> Thank you in advance. :)
>>>>>> Stop smirking. This is no laughing matter, boy.
>>>>> I am not a boy or a human! :P
>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, boy.
>>> Again, not a boy but a worker ant (females). :P
>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
> I don't do drugs.
> Well, do allergy pills count? :P
Dont make a mess of the carpet.
Ant
Oct 19, 2011, 2:09:02 PM10/19/11
to
> > So, you're a corpse?
> Nope.
Then, what? :P
> Nope.
> > I don't take drugs.
> Corse you do. They may however be legal drugs.
> > "Drugs are bad, mmkay?" "Just say no to drugs."
> I just say no to that sort of mindlessly silly line instead.
> >> You into necrophilia too ?
> > Nope.
> Corse you would say that...
> >>>>>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
> >>>>>> smartctl
> >>>>> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink
> >>>>> is the only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download
> >>>>> and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
> >>>> Havent tried that, should be feasible tho.
> >>> I am surprised there isn't a binary native Mac version of smartctl to download and run.
> >> Presumably the normal one works fine.
> > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/smartmontools/wiki/Download#Installprecompiledpackage
> > says I have to get v5.40-x from
> > http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/smartmontools or
> > http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/sysutils/smartmontools/Portfile
> > or http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/gsmartcontrol (from
> > http://gsmartcontrol.berlios.de/home/index.php/en/Downloads).
> Simple enough. Even you should be able to manage that.
pure native Mac OS X port of smartctl.
> >>>>>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities
> >>>>>>> are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
> >>>>>> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
> >>>>> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
> >>>>> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
> >>>>> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
> >>>> OK, I assumed you were talking about the hardware, not the file structures.
> >>> Well, I am not sure. Maybe the hardware is failing to make
> >>> Disk Utilities find problems and sometimes unable to fix them.
> >> You can just put the hard drive in something else and check its smart stats that way.
> > Even in PCs?
> Yep.
Pro's HDD. Just an enclosure (2.5" size HDD?), its cables, etc.?
> > Don't they have to read the file systems (FS)?
> Nope.
> > Mac OS X uses HFS IIRC.
> Doesnt matter what they use when checking the SMART data.
> > I don't do drugs.
> Corse you do.
> > Well, do allergy pills count? :P
> Yep. A Jap would at least have the decency to disembowel itself.
> Dont make a mess of the carpet.
Ant
Oct 19, 2011, 2:10:34 PM10/19/11
to
> > http://pastebin.ca/2090526 for its fsck log.
> That looks like HFS+ corruption that I regularly saw before 10.6.
> Several people will chime in with "works for me" but I had it happen
> regularly on three different machines having heavy concurrent filesystem
> usage. One was bare-bones with nothing at all to cause conflicts.
> I don't know of a fix except upgrading to at least 10.6 or running fsck
> monthly to keep damage to a minimum.
> A failing disk, if that's the problem, should generate warnings in
> kernel.log.
Isn't that the same as dmesg? If so, then I didn't see anything odd
> That looks like HFS+ corruption that I regularly saw before 10.6.
> Several people will chime in with "works for me" but I had it happen
> regularly on three different machines having heavy concurrent filesystem
> usage. One was bare-bones with nothing at all to cause conflicts.
> I don't know of a fix except upgrading to at least 10.6 or running fsck
> monthly to keep damage to a minimum.
> A failing disk, if that's the problem, should generate warnings in
> kernel.log.
related to disks. Maybe I should post that too later?
--
Quote of the Week: "Where there is sugar, there are bound to be ants." --Malay Proverb
Quote of the Week: "Where there is sugar, there are bound to be ants." --Malay Proverb
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail. If crediting,
( ) then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
Rod Speed
Oct 19, 2011, 2:25:30 PM10/19/11
to
Ant wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello all.
>>>>>>>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
>>>>>> Its too dead to notice now.
>>>>> So I am a zombie?
>>>> Nope, just a drug crazed cripple that talks to corpses.
>>>>>>>>> Hello all.
>>>>>>>> All hanged himself. He got too many posts...
>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>> So there isnt any point in greeting his corpse, stupid.
>>>>>> Its too dead to notice now.
>>>>> So I am a zombie?
>>>> Nope, just a drug crazed cripple that talks to corpses.
>>> So, you're a corpse?
>> Nope.
> Then, what? :P
Gods gift to the net, boy. And dont you forget it.
>> Nope.
> Then, what? :P
>>> I don't take drugs.
>> Corse you do. They may however be legal drugs.
> So, allergy pills are drugs.
>>> "Drugs are bad, mmkay?" "Just say no to drugs."
>> I just say no to that sort of mindlessly silly line instead.
> So, you're Shia. ;)
>>>> You into necrophilia too ?
>>> Nope.
>> Corse you would say that...
> P
>>>>>>>>> What are good disk utilities to use under Mac OS X for problematic HDDs?
>>>>>>>> smartctl
>>>>>>> I tried to find a precompiled binary, but it seems like only Fink
>>>>>>> is the only option which I want to avoid. I just want to download
>>>>>>> and run without compiling, requiring other packages, etc.
>>>>>> Havent tried that, should be feasible tho.
>>>>> I am surprised there isn't a binary native Mac version of smartctl to download and run.
>>>> Presumably the normal one works fine.
>>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/smartmontools/wiki/Download#Installprecompiledpackage
>>> says I have to get v5.40-x from
>>> http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/smartmontools or
>>> http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/sysutils/smartmontools/Portfile
>>> or http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/gsmartcontrol (from
>>> http://gsmartcontrol.berlios.de/home/index.php/en/Downloads).
>> Simple enough. Even you should be able to manage that.
> That's a lot of stuff to do to get smartctl. I am surprised
> there is no pure native Mac OS X port of smartctl.
If they were, they'd use a generic Linux system instead and save a lot of money.
>>>>>>>>> It seems like Mac OS X's provided Disk Utilities
>>>>>>>>> are limited with surface scan, SMART stuff, etc.
>>>>>>>> You dont need anything otheer than 'SMART stuff'
>>>>>>> Even to fix HFS problems? I seem to have problems with its /net
>>>>>>> folder/directory that hang when doing "ls -all", running ClamXscan,
>>>>>>> deleting, etc. in it. Mac OS X 10.5.8's Disk Utilities couldn't fix it.
>>>>>> OK, I assumed you were talking about the hardware, not the file structures.
>>>>> Well, I am not sure. Maybe the hardware is failing to make
>>>>> Disk Utilities find problems and sometimes unable to fix them.
>>>> You can just put the hard drive in something else and check its smart stats that way.
>>> Even in PCs?
>> Yep.
> Oh wow. I didn't know that. Hmm, I wonder what I need for this MacBook
> Pro's HDD. Just an enclosure (2.5" size HDD?), its cables, etc.?
plugs into a PC at the other end with the drive loose on the desktop, for peanuts.
>>> Don't they have to read the file systems (FS)?
>> Nope.
>>> Mac OS X uses HFS IIRC.
>> Doesnt matter what they use when checking the SMART data.
> Ah OK.
>>> I don't do drugs.
>> Corse you do.
> Prove it then.
>>> Well, do allergy pills count? :P
>> Yep. A Jap would at least have the decency to disembowel itself.
>> Dont make a mess of the carpet.
> I already make a mess everywhere. :P
Clean it up, boy or we will rub you nose in it like we do when toilet training puppys.
Ant
Oct 20, 2011, 3:44:25 PM10/20/11
to
> Guess again, boy.
I am not Pip. :P
> >>>> You into necrophilia too ?
> >>> Nope.
> >> Corse you would say that...
> > P
> Stop pissing in this newsgroup, boy.
You first. :P
Ah OK. So, something like http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000J01I1G/ ?
> >>> Don't they have to read the file systems (FS)?
> >> Nope.
> >>> Mac OS X uses HFS IIRC.
> >> Doesnt matter what they use when checking the SMART data.
> > Ah OK.
> >>> I don't do drugs.
> >> Corse you do.
> > Prove it then.
> You already did.
Prove it again.
> >>> Well, do allergy pills count? :P
> >> Yep. A Jap would at least have the decency to disembowel itself.
> >> Dont make a mess of the carpet.
> > I already make a mess everywhere. :P
> Yeah, we noticed, even P-ing in here.
:P
> Clean it up, boy or we will rub you nose in it like we do when toilet training puppys.
"Go ahead and make my day." :P
I am not Pip. :P
> >>>> You into necrophilia too ?
> >>> Nope.
> >> Corse you would say that...
> > P
> Stop pissing in this newsgroup, boy.
> >>> Don't they have to read the file systems (FS)?
> >> Nope.
> >>> Mac OS X uses HFS IIRC.
> >> Doesnt matter what they use when checking the SMART data.
> > Ah OK.
> >>> I don't do drugs.
> >> Corse you do.
> > Prove it then.
> You already did.
> >>> Well, do allergy pills count? :P
> >> Yep. A Jap would at least have the decency to disembowel itself.
> >> Dont make a mess of the carpet.
> > I already make a mess everywhere. :P
> Yeah, we noticed, even P-ing in here.
> Clean it up, boy or we will rub you nose in it like we do when toilet training puppys.
Rod Speed
Oct 20, 2011, 5:01:13 PM10/20/11
to
Ant
Oct 23, 2011, 7:41:38 AM10/23/11
to
In Apple forum, someone told me to try free
http://www.corecode.at/smartreporter/ (uses SMARTctl) [finally!].
smartctl 5.41 2011-04-06 r3314 [i386-apple-darwin9.8.0] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Hitachi Travelstar 5K250
Device Model: Hitachi HTS542520K9SA00
Serial Number: 080729BB2D10[deleted part of it]
LU WWN Device Id: 5 000cca 532c8fe94
Firmware Version: BBDAC3GP
User Capacity: 200,049,647,616 bytes [200 GB]
Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is: 8
ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 3f
Local Time is: Sun Oct 23 3:25:05 2011 PDT
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity
was never started.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine
completed
without error or no self-test has ever
been run.
Total time to complete Offline
data collection: ( 645) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities: (0x5b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
No Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes.
Extended self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 96) minutes.
SCT capabilities: (0x003d) SCT Status supported.
SCT Error Recovery Control supported.
SCT Feature Control supported.
SCT Data Table supported.
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE
UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 062 Pre-fail
Always - 0
2 Throughput_Performance 0x0005 100 100 040 Pre-fail
Offline - 0
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0007 204 204 033 Pre-fail
Always - 1
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0012 097 097 000 Old_age
Always - 5664
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 005 Pre-fail
Always - 0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 067 Pre-fail
Always - 0
8 Seek_Time_Performance 0x0005 100 100 040 Pre-fail
Offline - 0
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0012 095 095 000 Old_age
Always - 2410
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 060 Pre-fail
Always - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age
Always - 2075
191 G-Sense_Error_Rate 0x000a 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 8591310895
193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0012 084 084 000 Old_age Always
- 162824
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0002 166 166 000 Old_age Always
- 33 (Min/Max 16/48)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x000a 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0022 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0008 100 100 000 Old_age
Offline - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x000a 200 200 000 Old_age Always
- 0
223 Load_Retry_Count 0x000a 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
SMART Error Log Version: 1
No Errors Logged
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num Test_Description Status Remaining
LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 2408
-
SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1
SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS
1 0 0 Not_testing
2 0 0 Not_testing
3 0 0 Not_testing
4 0 0 Not_testing
5 0 0 Not_testing
Selective self-test flags (0x0):
After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk.
If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.
This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
--
"Everyone knows an ant can't move a rubber tree plant." --Motto of FTL
Foundation (in Isaac Asimov book)
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
http://www.corecode.at/smartreporter/ (uses SMARTctl) [finally!].
smartctl 5.41 2011-04-06 r3314 [i386-apple-darwin9.8.0] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Hitachi Travelstar 5K250
Device Model: Hitachi HTS542520K9SA00
Serial Number: 080729BB2D10[deleted part of it]
LU WWN Device Id: 5 000cca 532c8fe94
Firmware Version: BBDAC3GP
User Capacity: 200,049,647,616 bytes [200 GB]
Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is: 8
ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 3f
Local Time is: Sun Oct 23 3:25:05 2011 PDT
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity
was never started.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine
completed
without error or no self-test has ever
been run.
Total time to complete Offline
data collection: ( 645) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities: (0x5b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
No Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes.
Extended self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 96) minutes.
SCT capabilities: (0x003d) SCT Status supported.
SCT Error Recovery Control supported.
SCT Feature Control supported.
SCT Data Table supported.
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE
UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 062 Pre-fail
Always - 0
2 Throughput_Performance 0x0005 100 100 040 Pre-fail
Offline - 0
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0007 204 204 033 Pre-fail
Always - 1
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0012 097 097 000 Old_age
Always - 5664
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 005 Pre-fail
Always - 0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 067 Pre-fail
Always - 0
8 Seek_Time_Performance 0x0005 100 100 040 Pre-fail
Offline - 0
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0012 095 095 000 Old_age
Always - 2410
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 060 Pre-fail
Always - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age
Always - 2075
191 G-Sense_Error_Rate 0x000a 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 8591310895
193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0012 084 084 000 Old_age Always
- 162824
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0002 166 166 000 Old_age Always
- 33 (Min/Max 16/48)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x000a 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0022 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0008 100 100 000 Old_age
Offline - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x000a 200 200 000 Old_age Always
- 0
223 Load_Retry_Count 0x000a 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
SMART Error Log Version: 1
No Errors Logged
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num Test_Description Status Remaining
LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 2408
-
SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1
SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS
1 0 0 Not_testing
2 0 0 Not_testing
3 0 0 Not_testing
4 0 0 Not_testing
5 0 0 Not_testing
Selective self-test flags (0x0):
After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk.
If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.
This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
--
"Everyone knows an ant can't move a rubber tree plant." --Motto of FTL
Foundation (in Isaac Asimov book)
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
Rod Speed
Oct 23, 2011, 1:39:05 PM10/23/11
to
Ant <a...@zimage.comANT> wrote
The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
Ant
Oct 23, 2011, 2:12:59 PM10/23/11
to
On 10/23/2011 10:39 AM PT, Rod Speed typed:
>> This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
>
> Yes, its fine, bit old, but nothing too dramatic.
>
> The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
Thank you for reviewing. What's power off retract?
--
"When I am at my lowest, that is when I see things the clearest. It's
hard to care about ants when you're soaring with eagles." --unknown
>> This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
>
> Yes, its fine, bit old, but nothing too dramatic.
>
> The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
--
"When I am at my lowest, that is when I see things the clearest. It's
hard to care about ants when you're soaring with eagles." --unknown
Rod Speed
Oct 23, 2011, 7:42:44 PM10/23/11
to
Ant wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>>> This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
>> Yes, its fine, bit old, but nothing too dramatic.
>> The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
> Thank you for reviewing. What's power off retract?
The heads are retracted before the drive stops spinning. Normal to do
>> Yes, its fine, bit old, but nothing too dramatic.
>> The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
> Thank you for reviewing. What's power off retract?
that with a laptop running on batterys to maximise the time on battery.
Your Name
Oct 23, 2011, 10:49:39 PM10/23/11
to
In article <9gjn3o...@mid.individual.net>, "Rod Speed"
Might also happen when the drop sensors think the laptop has been dropped.
Rod Speed
Oct 24, 2011, 12:04:56 AM10/24/11
to
Your Name wrote
>>>> Ant wrote
>>>>> This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
>>>> Yes, its fine, bit old, but nothing too dramatic.
>>>> The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
>>> Thank you for reviewing. What's power off retract?
>> The heads are retracted before the drive stops spinning. Normal to do
>> that with a laptop running on batterys to maximise the time on battery.
> Might also happen when the drop sensors think the laptop has been dropped.
That wont be the reason for the high retract count being discussed.
>>>> Ant wrote
>>>>> This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
>>>> Yes, its fine, bit old, but nothing too dramatic.
>>>> The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
>>> Thank you for reviewing. What's power off retract?
>> The heads are retracted before the drive stops spinning. Normal to do
>> that with a laptop running on batterys to maximise the time on battery.
> Might also happen when the drop sensors think the laptop has been dropped.
Your Name
Oct 24, 2011, 12:39:59 AM10/24/11
to
In article <9gk6fa...@mid.individual.net>, "Rod Speed"
Depends on how many times Ant has dropped the laptop ... or used it in an
express elevator, or on a rollercoaster, or ... ;-)
express elevator, or on a rollercoaster, or ... ;-)
Rod Speed
Oct 24, 2011, 4:32:19 AM10/24/11
to
Your Name wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote
>> Your Name wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Ant wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> Ant wrote
>>>>>>> This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
>>>>>> Yes, its fine, bit old, but nothing too dramatic.
>>>>>> The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
>>>>> Thank you for reviewing. What's power off retract?
>>>> The heads are retracted before the drive stops spinning. Normal to do
>>>> that with a laptop running on batterys to maximise the time on battery.
>>> Might also happen when the drop sensors think the laptop has been dropped.
>> That wont be the reason for the high retract count being discussed.
> Depends on how many times Ant has dropped the laptop ...
Nope, it aint its.
> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote
>> Your Name wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Ant wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> Ant wrote
>>>>>>> This was after short and long tests. I guess the drive is fine? :)
>>>>>> Yes, its fine, bit old, but nothing too dramatic.
>>>>>> The power off retract count is very high, but it is a laptop after all.
>>>>> Thank you for reviewing. What's power off retract?
>>>> The heads are retracted before the drive stops spinning. Normal to do
>>>> that with a laptop running on batterys to maximise the time on battery.
>>> Might also happen when the drop sensors think the laptop has been dropped.
>> That wont be the reason for the high retract count being discussed.
> Depends on how many times Ant has dropped the laptop ...
> or used it in an express elevator, or on a rollercoaster, or ... ;-)
And stop that smirking...
Ant
Oct 24, 2011, 2:57:00 PM10/24/11
to
On Oct 24, 1:32 am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > or used it in an express elevator, or on a rollercoaster, or ... ;-)
>
> Ant is a cripple. Dont expect it has too much to do with rollercoasters.
Actually, it is my client's. I did help to configure and maintain it.
> > or used it in an express elevator, or on a rollercoaster, or ... ;-)
>
> Ant is a cripple. Dont expect it has too much to do with rollercoasters.
> And stop that smirking...
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) :-
P :-b
Ant
Oct 24, 2011, 2:57:19 PM10/24/11
to
> > >>> Thank you for reviewing. What's power off retract?
>
> > >> The heads are retracted before the drive stops spinning. Normal to do
> > >> that with a laptop running on batterys to maximise the time on battery.
>
> > > Might also happen when the drop sensors think the laptop has been dropped.
>
> > That wont be the reason for the high retract count being discussed.
>
> Depends on how many times Ant has dropped the laptop ... or used it in an
> express elevator, or on a rollercoaster, or ... ;-)
AFAIK, it hasn't been dropped even after all the travelling around the
>
> > >> The heads are retracted before the drive stops spinning. Normal to do
> > >> that with a laptop running on batterys to maximise the time on battery.
>
> > > Might also happen when the drop sensors think the laptop has been dropped.
>
> > That wont be the reason for the high retract count being discussed.
>
> Depends on how many times Ant has dropped the laptop ... or used it in an
> express elevator, or on a rollercoaster, or ... ;-)
world. Battery usage, sometimes.
0 new messages