Steve Carroll screws it for all Comcast users
Rhino Plastee
usenet access on Comcast. Got an email from my source there and apparently
he and about a dozen others have ruined it for all comcast users Comcast no
longer will support usenet at all. They do not make any money off it and
Steve and "about a dozen" others were causing them so much grief it become a
liability.
Way to go, Steve, ruin it for thousands of people just so you can be a
prick.
Snit
giri2q$pni$1...@news.albasani.net on 12/23/08 1:35 PM:
I received the same form letter... such good "sources" you have. :)
Comcast was actually fairly good about reacting to Steve's antics... both
for those of us who complained and for him. They gave him a warning, and
when failed they killed his access. And then later they decided people like
him made it just not worth it to have Usenet at all... which is a shame, a
few people should not ruin it for the masses. But you have a few in every
crowd - and Carroll was the one of the few in the Comcast crowd that made it
just not worth it for them as a business. There are plenty of good services
out there, both free and inexpensive, so hopefully other Comcast members are
not put through to many inconveniences based on the Carroll's of the world.
--
I think the Apple guys have a very good point when they say we should let
designers lead the definition of the user experience.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)
Steve Carroll
> "Rhino Plastee" <no...@nowhere.com> stated in post
>
> > I complained abotu Steve's fucked up crap some time ago and Steve lost his
> > usenet access on Comcast. Got an email from my source there and apparently
> > he and about a dozen others have ruined it for all comcast users Comcast no
> > longer will support usenet at all. They do not make any money off it and
> > Steve and "about a dozen" others were causing them so much grief it become a
> > liability.
>
> > Way to go, Steve, ruin it for thousands of people just so you can be a
> > prick.
>
> I received the same form letter... such good "sources" you have. :)
>
> Comcast was actually fairly good about reacting to Steve's antics... both
> for those of us who complained and for him. They gave him a warning, and
> when failed they killed his access.
Here is a post I wrote in late Oct. (the last month Comcast provided
usenet access)... posted from a Comcast server:
trollkiller-909A...@newsgroups.comcast.net
Poor, poor Snit... reality just keeps pounding away at him;)
(snip other delusions by Snit and his puppets/shills)
Rhino Plastee
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.guitar.amps,alt.vacation.las-vegas,rec.music.beatles,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.fan.howard-stern
Subject: Re: Spread the wealth?
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 133
Message-ID:
<0a3b7705-e958-4e13...@n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
References: <Dh1Nk.4693$ZP4....@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com>
<raeeg4paftne69827...@4ax.com>
<N0INk.192063$KY3.1...@fe02.news.easynews.com>
<MPG.2371b3d9e...@news.motzarella.org>
<86WdnV1Mpa0JcZrU...@supernews.com>
<1e0Ok.63153$HE4....@fe04.news.easynews.com>
<fMednZGw_tfAC5XU...@supernews.com>
<Cs3Ok.686502$J72.3...@fe05.news.easynews.com>
<m5CdnSWfn68xT5XU...@supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.176.47.125
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1225318221 24820 127.0.0.1 (29 Oct 2008 22:10:21
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:10:21 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.176.47.125;
posting-account=qzPusQoAAADVdKNEKE-jqIVbecHp7oZ7
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_5; en-us)
AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2
Safari/525.20.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
October 29. Steve Carroll is posting to a bunch of groups from Google
groups. Of couse they lying piece of shit known as Steve Carroll will say
that Comcast is lying and the emails they sent to people who complained
about his crap were all lies.
Oh, and Snit, the rep I talked to was CSAT...@comcast.net. He was very
helpful and made it very clear the problem with Steve Carroll was being
handled quickly and appropriately. His account was cancelled. He did then
get another account just to try to bypass the block. That account was
cancelled as well. Would not surprise me if he kept playing that same game
and that is one of the reasons Comcast simply threw in the towel Whatever
the exact reason why, Comcast made it clear Steve Carroll and a small number
of other abusers of their system was the reason they dropped usenet support.
He fucked it up for everyone.
The worst part is he was specifically told his actions would fuck it up for
others. He clearly got off on that.
Snit
...
> October 29. Steve Carroll is posting to a bunch of groups from Google
> groups. Of couse they lying piece of shit known as Steve Carroll will say
> that Comcast is lying and the emails they sent to people who complained
> about his crap were all lies.
The important part is that Steve knows - absolutely knows - that his BS lead
him to bad things. He will under no circumstances admit to this in public.
Ever. He will deny and try to turn things around and blame the people that
let his ISP know how out of hand he became... but he still knows.
Maybe he will learn something from that once his anger dies down. I
sincerely hope so. I have seen other bullies, much like Steve, who have
eventually grown up.
> Oh, and Snit, the rep I talked to was CSAT...@comcast.net.
>
Not the same one I talked to - but the exact same "pattern" of email.
> He was very helpful and made it very clear the problem with Steve Carroll was
> being handled quickly and appropriately.
>
I got similar information from Comcast.
> His account was cancelled. He did then get another account just to try to
> bypass the block. That account was cancelled as well.
That part I did not know. Not a surprise, though, given how he at one time
was paying *my* ISP to have an account so he could try to forge me. My ISP
cancelled that account once they were in on the game.
> Would not surprise me
> if he kept playing that same game and that is one of the reasons Comcast
> simply threw in the towel Whatever the exact reason why, Comcast made it
> clear Steve Carroll and a small number of other abusers of their system was
> the reason they dropped usenet support. He fucked it up for everyone.
>
> The worst part is he was specifically told his actions would fuck it up for
> others. He clearly got off on that.
That is not surprising.
--
BU__SH__
Sandman
"Rhino Plastee" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
Is this a new or an old Snit sock puppet? I don't keep track of them
anymore.
--
Sandman[.net]
Tim Adams
Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
its one from a couple of months ago.
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
Me
> In article <mr-1500AF.11...@News.Individual.NET>,
> Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <giri2q$pni$1...@news.albasani.net>,
>> "Rhino Plastee" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I complained abotu Steve's fucked up crap some time ago and Steve lost his
>>> usenet access on Comcast. Got an email from my source there and apparently
>>> he and about a dozen others have ruined it for all comcast users Comcast
>>> no
>>> longer will support usenet at all. They do not make any money off it and
>>> Steve and "about a dozen" others were causing them so much grief it become
>>> a
>>> liability.
>>>
>>> Way to go, Steve, ruin it for thousands of people just so you can be a
>>> prick.
>> Is this a new or an old Snit sock puppet? I don't keep track of them
>> anymore.
>
> its one from a couple of months ago.
Snit should be giving up posting here soon. He agreed to spend his
spare time with a stray dog he adopted from his local dog pound.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Snit
mr-1500AF.11...@News.Individual.NET on 12/24/08 3:18 AM:
Ah, another empty accusation from Sandman... it is so cute when the trolls
cuddle!
--
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)
Snit
12/24/08 8:26 AM:
You have a very active imagination. Put it to better use than this!
--
I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is to try to please
everyone. -- Bill Cosby
Steve Carroll
> "Rhino Plastee" <no...@nowhere.com> stated in post
>
> ...
>
> > October 29. Steve Carroll is posting to a bunch of groups from Google
> > groups. Of couse they lying piece of shit known as Steve Carroll will say
> > that Comcast is lying and the emails they sent to people who complained
> > about his crap were all lies.
>
> The important part is that Steve knows - absolutely knows - that his BS lead
> him to bad things.
Bad things equals nothing. I am still a Comcast user... and, contrary
to the lies Snit and his puppets have tried to sell, I'm still using
the same Comcast account I've been using for years. Fact: Like
everyone else, Comcast spotted Snit for the troll that he was as soon
as I showed them a few posts of his.
> He will under no circumstances admit to this in public.
Translation: Snit will, under no circumstances, provide proof for what
he claims... despite google *already* showing evidence to the contrary
(with my help by providing the links I have that prove Snit is lying).
> Ever. He will deny and try to turn things around and blame the people that
> let his ISP know how out of hand he became... but he still knows.
Translation: Steve knows, just like everywhere else knows, that Snit
is a narcissistic lunatic. In fact, Snit is *so* narcissistic that he
is seen here actually trying to convince people that Comcast based
their decision to stop providing usenet access to its users due to
Snit and his sock puppets whining about me bashing the snot out of him
with reality (as if Comcast gives a rat's ass about morons like Snit;)
(snip lies and BS by Snit and his puppet/shill)
Steve Carroll
> > Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
>
> >> In article <giri2q$pn...@news.albasani.net>,
> >> "Rhino Plastee" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> >>> I complained abotu Steve's fucked up crap some time ago and Steve lost his
> >>> usenet access on Comcast. Got an email from my source there and apparently
> >>> he and about a dozen others have ruined it for all comcast users Comcast
> >>> no
> >>> longer will support usenet at all. They do not make any money off it and
> >>> Steve and "about a dozen" others were causing them so much grief it become
> >>> a
> >>> liability.
>
> >>> Way to go, Steve, ruin it for thousands of people just so you can be a
> >>> prick.
> >> Is this a new or an old Snit sock puppet? I don't keep track of them
> >> anymore.
>
> > its one from a couple of months ago.
>
> Snit should be giving up posting here soon. He agreed to spend his
> spare time with a stray dog he adopted from his local dog pound.
> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
Snit once had a dog... it was even cuter than he is... but it drowned
and washed up on a beach in Montauk.
High Plains Thumper
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>> Me wrote:
>>> Tim Adams wrote:
>>>> Sandman wrote:
>>>>> "Rhino Plastee" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I complained abotu Steve's fucked up crap some time ago and Steve
>>>>>> lost his usenet access on Comcast. Got an email from my source
>>>>>> there and apparently he and about a dozen others have ruined it for
>>>>>> all comcast users Comcast no longer will support usenet at all.
>>>>>> They do not make any money off it and Steve and "about a dozen"
>>>>>> others were causing them so much grief it become a
>>>>>> liability.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Way to go, Steve, ruin it for thousands of people just so you can
>>>>>> be a prick.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a new or an old Snit sock puppet? I don't keep track of them
>>>>> anymore.
>>>>
>>>> its one from a couple of months ago.
>>>
>>> Snit should be giving up posting here soon. He agreed to spend his
>>> spare time with a stray dog he adopted from his local dog pound. **
>>> Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
>>
>> Snit once had a dog... it was even cuter than he is... but it drowned
>> and washed up on a beach in Montauk.
>
>
> That is pathetic.
Interesting. The troll could not leave enough alone, but had to take
this out of comp.os.mac.advocacy, dragging it to
comp.os.linux.advocacy (COLA), adding a slew of other unrelated groups
like alt.usenet.kooks, rec.music.makers.guitar.acoustic,
rec.sport.pro-wrestling.fantasy and uk.media.tv.misc, which are totally
unrelated. Then forces it as a Followup-To COMA:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/87582bb8006894d0
Very trollish.
I just checked, Steve Carroll still posts from Comcast.net. Of course it
is beyond this troll to overcome its illiteracy with reading headers, just
like some of the idiot trolls in COLA. Then complain about an imaginery
unfairness that has little to do with the discussion at hand.
Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Of course it is beyond this troll to overcome its illiteracy with
>> reading headers, just like some of the idiot trolls in COLA. Then
>> complain about an imaginery unfairness that has little to do with the
>> discussion at hand.
>>
>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>
> make if fucking clear as day he is no longer using Comcast Usenet
> services. Hell, he fucked all Comcast users and now Comcast does not
> even provide Usenet services. You lie and say I cannot read headers but
> you can not fucking read posts. Grow a brain asshole.
Yeah, right .... blame Steve Carroll for the discontinuation of Comcast
Usenet as if it were his fault, even though it was a Comcast business
decision. Poor wittle troll was picked on by Steve and had its wittle
feelings hurt, so it must crosspost to receive comfort from COLA, Usenet
kook, accoustic guitar, pro-wrestling and UK media trolls, I suppose.
Snit
giv953$dl4$1...@news.albasani.net on 12/24/08 11:27 PM:
Comcast made it clear that the reason they made their business decision is
that Steve and a small number of others made it not worth it for them to
offer the service. They were spending too many resources to make it worth
it for them. As even Steve has now admitted, though he denied it in the
past, Comcast and he had talks and he felt the need to try to defend
himself. He failed. His Usenet access was dropped and, apparently, he then
got another account from them (though at the same house? Not sure how that
works - just going on what others have said). Whatever the details are,
Comcast then decided that it was not in their interest to keep Usenet
services. Steve was a part of a very small number of Comcast users who
ruined it for the majority.
--
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
--Albert Einstein
High Plains Thumper
> "High Plains Thumper" stated:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/357/1027357/comcast-shut-free-
usenet-access
[quote]
The Big Media companies have been pressuring ISP companies to
discontinue their Usenet services, because the MAFIAA simply
can't stand the thought that some Internet users might be using a
few Usenet newsgroups to share some bootleg copies of tunes and
clips.
It means nothing to either the media cartels or the ISPs that
most casual file sharing on Usenet probably doesn't infringe any
copyrights, nor that the volume of other very useful content on
Usenet is far larger, by several orders of magnitude, than any
that is suspect.
Comcast is just the latest of the large ISPs to buckle under to
MAFIAA pressure from the music and movie cartels, but that
doesn't mean that they deserve to get away with this.
[/quote]
Similar to the Nazis blaming the Jews for things beyond their control,
Snit attempts to blame Steve Carroll, how sad.
Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
--
HPT
Snit
gj07r3$e0v$1...@news.motzarella.org on 12/25/08 8:11 AM:
Please show where I said there were no other business influences.
Oh.
Nowhere.
But I do know that *Comcast* claims Steve and a small number of other
abusers are part of what lead them to make their decision to drop Usenet.
Do you think abusers such as Steve has no influence on Comcast? That,
frankly, is a rather silly idea...
--
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments
that take our breath away.
Wally
C578EB02.E64C8%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Can't you honestly see just how pathetically stupid you're appearing with
this garbage you're posting Snit?
According to you (and it's all still there above Snit) Comcast were
prevented from having a viable business that was worth it to them to
continue with because of a "very small number of Comcast users", now the
obvious action for Comcast to take in that position would be to simply
remove this rogue element and continue with the viable service for what you
called the "majority"!
But what do you claim that Comcast actually did?..... 1) Removed the
minority from the service .... 2) Then closed the whole thing down, 3) Then
they reinstated at least one of the ones that according to you caused the
closure of the service in the first place!
There is only one believable aspect contained in your fantasy Snit and that
is where you say .... "Not sure how that works" and as far as you are
concerned that sentiment applies to anything associated with reality!
Wally
C578F3E4.E64DF%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
not worth it for them to offer the service."-Snit
If you were only able to comprehend not only what others say but what you
state yourself Snit you would understand the implication of stating ...
Notice *the reason they made their business decision* Snit? LOL
Now comes your usual back flip where you no longer hold to it being *the
reason* but you now imply that "other business influences" were to blame!
Exactly as others have been telling you all along!
> Oh.
Yup...Oh! :-)
Snit
C57A736D.A532%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/25/08 7:41 PM:
...
>> Comcast made it clear that the reason they made their business decision is
>> that Steve and a small number of others made it not worth it for them to
>> offer the service. They were spending too many resources to make it worth
>> it for them. As even Steve has now admitted, though he denied it in the
>> past, Comcast and he had talks and he felt the need to try to defend
>> himself. He failed. His Usenet access was dropped and, apparently, he then
>> got another account from them (though at the same house? Not sure how that
>> works - just going on what others have said). Whatever the details are,
>> Comcast then decided that it was not in their interest to keep Usenet
>> services. Steve was a part of a very small number of Comcast users who
>> ruined it for the majority.
>
> Can't you honestly see just how pathetically stupid you're appearing with
> this garbage you're posting Snit?
>
> According to you (and it's all still there above Snit) Comcast were
> prevented from having a viable business that was worth it to them to
> continue with because of a "very small number of Comcast users", now the
> obvious action for Comcast to take in that position would be to simply
> remove this rogue element and continue with the viable service for what you
> called the "majority"!
Write to them and complain that they did not.
From what others have said, they tried and Steve got another account -
perhaps under his wife's name or whatever. Want details: call Comcast!
> But what do you claim that Comcast actually did?..... 1) Removed the
> minority from the service .... 2) Then closed the whole thing down, 3) Then
> they reinstated at least one of the ones that according to you caused the
> closure of the service in the first place!
Who said that?
> There is only one believable aspect contained in your fantasy Snit and that
> is where you say .... "Not sure how that works" and as far as you are
> concerned that sentiment applies to anything associated with reality!
Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet. If you do not like that or do
not believe it or just want to be a pain about it then call Comcast and
leave me and CSMA out of your concerns!
--
Picture of a tuna milkshake: http://snipurl.com/f34z
Feel free to ask for the recipe.
Snit
Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet. If you do not like that or do
not believe it or just want to be a pain about it then call Comcast and
leave me and CSMA out of your concerns!
--
One who makes no mistakes, never makes anything.
Snit
C57A77A0.A534%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/25/08 7:59 PM:
>> Please show where I said there were no other business influences.
>
> "Comcast made it clear that the reason they made their business
> decision is that Steve and a small number of others made it
> not worth it for them to offer the service."-Snit
>
> If you were only able to comprehend not only what others say but what you
> state yourself Snit you would understand the implication of stating ...
>
> Notice *the reason they made their business decision* Snit? LOL
>
> Now comes your usual back flip where you no longer hold to it being *the
> reason* but you now imply that "other business influences" were to blame!
>
> Exactly as others have been telling you all along!
>
>> Oh.
Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet. If you do not like that or do
not believe it or just want to be a pain about it then call Comcast and
leave me and CSMA out of your concerns!
--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.
High Plains Thumper
> Wally stated:
Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll made no such abuses.
This is only a very sorry and futile attempt by Snit to blame
Steve's truthful exposure of his trolling by attacking Steve.
> If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want to
> be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and CSMA out
> of your concerns!
Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee to post his
poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA, blaming Steve for the
demise of Comcast's direct support of Usenet. Then crossposts
to COLA and a slew of other non-related groups. Now he asks to
be left out. Snit made his bed, it is time for Snit to sleep in
it.
Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
--
HPT
Snit
>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll
>> were a part of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>
> Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll made no such abuses.
> This is only a very sorry and futile attempt by Snit to blame
> Steve's truthful exposure of his trolling by attacking Steve.
>
>> If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want to
>> be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and CSMA out
>> of your concerns!
>
> Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee to post his
> poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA, blaming Steve for the
> demise of Comcast's direct support of Usenet. Then crossposts
> to COLA and a slew of other non-related groups. Now he asks to
> be left out. Snit made his bed, it is time for Snit to sleep in
> it.
>
> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
I *never* said you were not a liar. Please do not go out of your way to
prove it!
--
I think we [the folks who make Linux desktops] don't yet deliver a good
enough user experience.
Snit
>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll
>> were a part of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>
> Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll made no such abuses.
> This is only a very sorry and futile attempt by Snit to blame
> Steve's truthful exposure of his trolling by attacking Steve.
>
>> If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want to
>> be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and CSMA out
>> of your concerns!
>
> Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee to post his
> poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA, blaming Steve for the
> demise of Comcast's direct support of Usenet. Then crossposts
> to COLA and a slew of other non-related groups. Now he asks to
> be left out. Snit made his bed, it is time for Snit to sleep in
> it.
>
> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
I *never* said you were not a liar... please stop going out of your way to
prove it!
--
You really have to give credit to Apple for driving innovation.
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>
>>> Carroll were a part of what lead them to stop supporting
>>> Usenet.
>>
>> Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll made no such
>> abuses. This is only a very sorry and futile attempt by Snit
>> to blame Steve's truthful exposure of his trolling by
>> attacking Steve.
>>
>>> If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want
>>> to be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and
>>> CSMA out of your concerns!
>>
>> Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee to post
>> his poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA, blaming Steve
>> for the demise of Comcast's direct support of Usenet. Then
>> crossposts to COLA and a slew of other non-related groups.
>> Now he asks to be left out. Snit made his bed, it is time
>> for Snit to sleep in it.
>>
>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>
> I *never* said you were not a liar. Please do not go out of
> your way to prove it!
Oh, so now I am a liar according to Snit. Rather, the proof is
on Snit. The burden is captured in all its glory in this thread.
http://www.healthmad.com/Mental-Health/How-to-Spot-a-Pathological-
Liar.171119
[quote]
How to Spot a Pathological Liar
* They change their story all the time
* They will exaggerate and lie about everything, the smallest
and easiest things to tell the truth about and the big serious
things
* What ever you do, they can do it better.
* They often don't value the truth, and can often live in
their own type of reality.
* They will act defensively when questioned or challenged,
they see their lies as not hurting anyone
* They lie for sympathy or to seem better
* They usually never own up to the lies
* They contradict what they say, they lose track of the many
lies told
* They lie because they are insecure
[/quote]
--
HPT
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>
>>>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve
>>>> Carroll were a part of what lead them to stop supporting
>>>> Usenet.
>>>
>>> Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll made no such
>>> abuses. This is only a very sorry and futile attempt by Snit
>>> to blame Steve's truthful exposure of his trolling by
>>> attacking Steve.
>>>
>>>> If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want
>>>> to be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and
>>>> CSMA out of your concerns!
>>>
>>> Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee to post
>>> his poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA, blaming Steve
>>> for the demise of Comcast's direct support of Usenet. Then
>>> crossposts to COLA and a slew of other non-related groups.
>>> Now he asks to be left out. Snit made his bed, it is time
>>> for Snit to sleep in it.
>>>
>>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>>
>> I *never* said you were not a liar. Please do not go out of
>> your way to prove it!
>
> Oh, so now I am a liar according to Snit.
Of course. You are making up stories. You lied, and your lies are quoted,
above. Just some of you lies:
Comcast made no such alibis.
But you have *no* idea what people from Comcast said or did not say.
Steve Carroll made no such abuses.
That is laughable. Completely. The hate filled freak has spent years lying
about me and finally flipped his wig and started targeting health based
support groups to get to me.
This is only a very sorry and futile attempt by Snit
to blame Steve's truthful exposure of his trolling by
attacking Steve.
LOL! Steve Carroll.... *truthful*.. LOL! Seriously.
Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee
A complete lie from you. An absurdity, really.
On and on and on... you lied. You did not even *try* to pretend otherwise.
...
--
"For example, user interfaces are _usually_ better in commercial software.
I'm not saying that this is always true, but in many cases the user
interface to a program is the most important part for a commercial
company..." Linus Torvalds <http://www.tlug.jp/docs/linus.html>
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>
>>>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve
>>>> Carroll were a part of what lead them to stop supporting
>>>> Usenet.
>>>
>>> Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll made no such
>>> abuses. This is only a very sorry and futile attempt by Snit
>>> to blame Steve's truthful exposure of his trolling by
>>> attacking Steve.
>>>
>>>> If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want
>>>> to be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and
>>>> CSMA out of your concerns!
>>>
>>> Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee to post
>>> his poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA, blaming Steve
>>> for the demise of Comcast's direct support of Usenet. Then
>>> crossposts to COLA and a slew of other non-related groups.
>>> Now he asks to be left out. Snit made his bed, it is time
>>> for Snit to sleep in it.
>>>
>>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>>
>> I *never* said you were not a liar. Please do not go out of
>> your way to prove it!
>
> Oh, so now I am a liar according to Snit.
...
> http://www.healthmad.com/Mental-Health/How-to-Spot-a-Pathological-
> Liar.171119
>
> or http://tinyurl.com/85owde
>
> [quote]
> How to Spot a Pathological Liar
>
> * They change their story all the time
> * They will exaggerate and lie about everything, the smallest
> and easiest things to tell the truth about and the big serious
> things
> * What ever you do, they can do it better.
> * They often don't value the truth, and can often live in
> their own type of reality.
> * They will act defensively when questioned or challenged,
> they see their lies as not hurting anyone
> * They lie for sympathy or to seem better
> * They usually never own up to the lies
> * They contradict what they say, they lose track of the many
> lies told
> * They lie because they are insecure
> [/quote]
I accept your description of yourself. Amazingly ... honest of you to
acknowledge that.
Wally
C5799BB3.E65F4%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57A736D.A532%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/25/08 7:41 PM:
>
> ...
>>> Comcast made it clear that the reason they made their business decision is
>>> that Steve and a small number of others made it not worth it for them to
>>> offer the service. They were spending too many resources to make it worth
>>> it for them. As even Steve has now admitted, though he denied it in the
>>> past, Comcast and he had talks and he felt the need to try to defend
>>> himself. He failed. His Usenet access was dropped and, apparently, he then
>>> got another account from them (though at the same house? Not sure how that
>>> works - just going on what others have said). Whatever the details are,
>>> Comcast then decided that it was not in their interest to keep Usenet
>>> services. Steve was a part of a very small number of Comcast users who
>>> ruined it for the majority.
>>
>> Can't you honestly see just how pathetically stupid you're appearing with
>> this garbage you're posting Snit?
>>
>> According to you (and it's all still there above Snit) Comcast were
>> prevented from having a viable business that was worth it to them to
>> continue with because of a "very small number of Comcast users", now the
>> obvious action for Comcast to take in that position would be to simply
>> remove this rogue element and continue with the viable service for what you
>> called the "majority"!
>
> Write to them and complain that they did not.
Ask them to justify your irrational ramblings? That's bound to work!
<eyeroll>
> From what others have said, they tried and Steve got another account -
> perhaps under his wife's name or whatever.
And you think that Comcast are too stupid to see from Steve's posts that an
allegedly banned person was still posting? You really do think that people
are as stupid as you need them to be don't you Snit?
> Want details: call Comcast!
So once again as was the case with -hh you make allegations but have
absolutely no support for them.... No great surprise there then!
>> But what do you claim that Comcast actually did?..... 1) Removed the
>> minority from the service .... 2) Then closed the whole thing down, 3) Then
>> they reinstated at least one of the ones that according to you caused the
>> closure of the service in the first place!
>
> Who said that?
You did!...
1) Removed the minority from the service.
"His Usenet access was dropped"-Snit
2) Then closed the whole thing down,
"Comcast then decided that it was not in their interest to keep Usenet
services."-Snit
3) Then they reinstated at least one of the ones that according to you
caused the closure of the service in the first place!
"he then got another account from them"-Snit
As I previously said to you Snit ... If you were only able to comprehend not
only what others say but what you state yourself Snit.
>
>> There is only one believable aspect contained in your fantasy Snit and that
>> is where you say .... "Not sure how that works" and as far as you are
>> concerned that sentiment applies to anything associated with reality!
>
> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
> of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
Where is this made clear Snit? In a thread authored by one of your sock
puppets?
Info can be found easily such as ...
----------------------------------------------
"While we have seen a decline in popularity of newsgroups as customers have
chosen to get information from other sources, we know a small percentage of
our customers continue to use newsgroups today. If you are interested in
continuing to access newsgroups, Giganews is offering a special promotion
for Comcast customers. Click here to learn more."
http://tinyurl.com/9uoasr
"I sent an e-mail to the contact e-mail address. I got a quick reply: Yes,
they were dropping the service because few people use it anymore."
http://tinyurl.com/7fx5mf
"This decision is in alignment with other Internet Service Providers that
have recently terminated their Newsgroups service due to the declining
popularity of Newsgroups as customers chose other methods, such as RSS feeds
and web browsing to access information."
http://tinyurl.com/6qvs7p
Dear Comcast High-Speed Internet Customer:
As of October 25, 2008, the complimentary Comcast Newsgroups service,
powered by Giganews, will be discontinued. This feature provided customers
access to 2 gigabytes of newsgroup information on a monthly basis. After
this date, these customers will no longer be able to access the Comcast
Newsgroups service through Comcast. Customers who have subscribed directly
to Giganews for newsgroup access will not be affected by this change.
While we have seen a decline in popularity of newsgroups as customers have
chosen to get information from other sources, we know a small percentage of
our customers continue to use newsgroups today. If you are interested in
continuing to access newsgroups, Giganews is offering a special promotion
for Comcast customers. [Which still leaves us paying at least $8/mo. for
newsgroups access, except with a discount for the first three months --
o.v.]
http://tinyurl.com/7t32qt
----------------------------------------
Where can anything that you have claimed as the reason for Comcast's action
be found Snit? How did this fantasy of yours become *clear* to you?
> If you do not like that or do not believe it
I am going directly to the source of what I don't believe Snit which is your
assertions wrt Comcast's actions, why would I approach Comcast over
something that as far as I can see they have never stated?
> or just want to be a pain about it then call Comcast and
> leave me and CSMA out of your concerns!
So you make assertions about a matter that you want to be left out of Snit?
I guess that makes as much sense as you usually do!
Wally
C5799BEC.E65F5%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Where Snit? Where did they make it clear? This is simply yet another round
of you making claims and then not being able to substantiate them!
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>>>
>>>>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve
>>>>> Carroll were a part of what lead them to stop
>>>>> supporting Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll made no such
>>>> abuses. This is only a very sorry and futile attempt by
>>>> Snit to blame Steve's truthful exposure of his trolling
>>>> by attacking Steve.
>>>>
>>>>> If you do not like that or do not believe it or just
>>>>> want to be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave
>>>>> me and CSMA out of your concerns!
>>>>
>>>> Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee to
>>>> post his poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA,
>>>> blaming Steve for the demise of Comcast's direct support
>>>> of Usenet. Then crossposts to COLA and a slew of other
>>>> non-related groups. Now he asks to be left out. Snit
>>>> made his bed, it is time for Snit to sleep in it.
>>>>
>>>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>>>
>>> I *never* said you were not a liar. Please do not go out
>>> of your way to prove it!
>>
>> is on Snit. The burden is captured in all its glory in this
>> thread.
>>
>> Pathological-Liar.171119
>>
>> or http://tinyurl.com/85owde
>>
>> [quote]
>> How to Spot a Pathological Liar
>>
>> * They change their story all the time
>> * They will exaggerate and lie about everything, the
>> smallest and easiest things to tell the truth about and the
>> big serious things
>> * What ever you do, they can do it better.
>> * They often don't value the truth, and can often live in
>> their own type of reality.
>> * They will act defensively when questioned or challenged,
>> they see their lies as not hurting anyone
>> * They lie for sympathy or to seem better
>> * They usually never own up to the lies
>> * They contradict what they say, they lose track of the many
>> lies told
>> * They lie because they are insecure
>> [/quote]
>
> I accept your description of yourself. Amazingly ... honest
> of you to acknowledge that.
It is rather sad that this troll cannot see itself in a mirror.
Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper stated:
All in all, Snit has shown himself to be a complete fool in this
thread. Much of what he has stated confirms what was stated below:
>> Rather, the proof is on Snit. The burden is captured in all
>> its glory in this thread.
>>
>> http://www.healthmad.com/Mental-Health/How-to-Spot-a-
>> Pathological-Liar.171119
>>
>> or http://tinyurl.com/85owde
>>
>> [quote] How to Spot a Pathological Liar
>>
>> * They change their story all the time
>> * They will exaggerate and lie about everything, the
>> smallest and easiest things to tell the truth about and the
>> big serious things
>> * What ever you do, they can do it better.
>> * They often don't value the truth, and can often live in
>> their own type of reality.
>> * They will act defensively when questioned or challenged,
>> they see their lies as not hurting anyone
>> * They lie for sympathy or to seem better
>> * They usually never own up to the lies * They contradict
>> what they say, they lose track of the many lies told
>> * They lie because they are insecure [/quote]
Snit's attempts to justify his gross snippages and puerile
comments have failed in its entirety.
The time has come for HPT's comments regarding the Snit Circus of
pathological lies in this thread to come to a close.
Buh bye, loser.
--
HPT
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "High Plains Thumper" <highplai...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
> gj1p71$e1$1...@news.motzarella.org on 12/25/08 10:14 PM:
>
>
> Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee
>
> A complete lie from you. An absurdity, really.
>
Except for when ....
Snit as Rhino Plastee stated:
"Clearly this is a bigoted postion you are pushing, Wally."-Rhino Plastee
I replied...
"Clearly for your argument to hold up you need to put words in my mouth!
tsk,tsk!"-Wally
Snit being unable to keep up with all his nymshifting then replied as
Snit...
"Nope: I quote you directly and in context:"-Snit
Proving that High Plains Thumper is correct, Snit does nymshift as Rhino
Plastee.
Snit
Nope. Nice try though!
--
The fact that OS X is growing and Linux isn't, tells you that OS X is
offering things that Linux is not.
Snit
>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
>> of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>
> Where Snit? Where did they make it clear? This is simply yet another round
> of you making claims and then not being able to substantiate them!
Comcast made it clear part of the reason for their business decision was
because of abusers of their system such as Steve Carroll and a few others.
I have talked about the email I received and Rhino Plastee has even offered
the email address of the tech he communicated with there.
If you want to debate someone, then contact Comcast... I do not want to be
in the middle of your BS fight where you try to defend the non-existent
"honor" of your co-troll Steve Carroll.
--
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters." - Alan Simpson
Snit
Call Comcast, Wally. I have no desire to be the middle man in your beef
with them.
--
Projects should really look to the whole Linux desktop and see how they can
appeal to both sides.
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57B26CC.E932%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/26/08 8:26 AM:
>
>> On 26/12/08 2:30 PM, in article C579B9F6.E675C%use...@gallopinginsanity.com,
>> "Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "High Plains Thumper" <highplai...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
>>> gj1p71$e1$1...@news.motzarella.org on 12/25/08 10:14 PM:
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> Snit nymshifts as Rhino Plastee
>>>
>>> A complete lie from you. An absurdity, really.
>>>
>>
>> Except for when ....
>>
>> Snit as Rhino Plastee stated:
>>
>> "Clearly this is a bigoted postion you are pushing, Wally."-Rhino Plastee
>>
>> I replied...
>>
>> "Clearly for your argument to hold up you need to put words in my mouth!
>> tsk,tsk!"-Wally
>>
>> Snit being unable to keep up with all his nymshifting then replied as
>> Snit...
>>
>> "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:"-Snit
>>
>> Proving that High Plains Thumper is correct, Snit does nymshift as Rhino
>> Plastee.
>>
>>
> Nope. Nice try though!
>
You wished!
Rhino Plastee states....
"Clearly this is a bigoted postion you are pushing, Wally".
Wally replies....
"Clearly for your argument to hold up you need to put words in my mouth!
tsk, tsk!"
Snit shoots himself in the foot and replies....
"Nope: I quote you directly and in context:"
ROTFLMAO!
Snit
In a sub-thread where the fact you were lying was pointed out, you brought
up a definition of "pathological liar". You are, clearly, trying to excuse
your lies by saying you cannot control yourself.
In any case: you clearly have a beef with Comcast over their using abusers
of their services as part of their bases to opt to no longer support
Usenet... so *call* them and stop trying to make me the middle man. I am
not your gopher!
Snit
Twist all you want, Wally... and you will!
--
"The music is not inside the piano." - Alan Kay
Snit
> On 27/12/08 1:15 AM, in article C57A513A.E67EA%use...@gallopinginsanity.com,
What quote of yours was being referenced?
Who quoted you saying it?
And Wally runs *again*... 100% predictable!
Poor Wally... cannot even understand the very links he presents. Poor, poor
Wally... all he can do is lie... and hope I will be the middle man for his
beef with Comcast as they slap his co-troll buddy Steve Carroll down.
Snit
...
> Snit's attempts to justify his gross snippages and puerile
> comments have failed in its entirety.
>
> The time has come for HPT's comments regarding the Snit Circus of
> pathological lies in this thread to come to a close.
>
> Buh bye, loser.
You are no longer going to post to this thread but will, I can hope, call
*Comcast* with your concerns... it is they, after all, and not me who you
have your beef with. I am glad you figured out I will *not* be the middle
man in your debate with them.
For the record, while I support their smacking down of Steve Carroll, I do
not wish they could have found a better way of dealing with it. By using
his aberrant behavior (and others like him) as a part of their decision
making process to dump Usenet they have given him power... which is what he
wants. He wants to feel like he actually makes a difference with his
trolling... and in this case he did.
--
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing. - Unknown
Tattoo Vampire
> Snit shoots himself in the foot and replies....
>
> "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:" http://tinyurl.com/7hlnq2
>
> ROTFLMAO!
Snit is a cross-posting troll who uses multiple aliases.
Snit
I have shown, conclusively, that Roy repeatedly posts the
same information about Apple, Microsoft, their products and
their leadership. Do you think it is an acceptable practice
to post the same off-topic information over and over? If so
you would be the first to say you disagree with my labeled of
such practices as off topic and inappropriate.
Which is *exactly* as I predicted:
Of course, it is 100% predictable that you will not answer
the question. You and I both know Roy is spamming, but since
he is supported by the self-proclaimed "advocate" crowd you
will not stand against him - you do not want to risk their
wrath. You will act cowardly and dodge the question.
I ended my post to him with:
Yes, that is 100% guaranteed. Prove me wrong if you dare.
But he did not dare. Of course not. If he thought his trolling was clever
and unpredictable I have just proved him wrong. :)
--
Projects should really look to the whole Linux desktop and see how they can
appeal to both sides.
Snit
William Poaster
Michael Snit Glasser should get out more. Or if he can't, here's
something for him to read: http://i42.tinypic.com/wujdaa.jpg
--
No room for the horrors
of Micro$oft here!
-- Stephen Fry - Room 101 --
Tattoo Vampire
> Which
Snit is a lying, cross-posting troll who uses multiple aliases.
Tattoo Vampire
> have
Snit is a lying, cross-posting troll who uses multiple aliases.
Snit
Snit
Tattoo Vampire
> Michael Snit Glasser should get out more.
He may be getting out a lot more, as in getting tossed out on his ear.
You know his long-suffering spouse is getting fed up with his lazy ass.
Snit
Tattoo Vampire
> as
Snit: doomed to endlessly repeat himself and gloat over his past
"triumphs". Oh, well, if it makes the poor little fellow feel better.
Snit
William Poaster
Can't say I'm surprised if she does. The Prescott Computer Guy does
nothing but troll newsgroups all day, every day.
Steve Carroll
> On 25/12/08 11:47 PM, in article
> C578EB02.E64C8%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
>
>
>
> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> > "High Plains Thumper" <highplainsthum...@invalid.invalid.com> stated in post
> > giv953$dl...@news.albasani.net on 12/24/08 11:27 PM:
>
> >> Rhino Plastee wrote:
> >>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
> >>>> reading headers, just like some of the idiot trolls in COLA. Then
> >>>> complain about an imaginery unfairness that has little to do with the
> >>>> discussion at hand.
>
> >>>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>
> >>> Who said Carroll lost all of his Comcast accounts entirely? His headers
> >>> make if fucking clear as day he is no longer using Comcast Usenet
> >>> services. Hell, he fucked all Comcast users and now Comcast does not
> >>> even provide Usenet services. You lie and say I cannot read headers but
> >>> you can not fucking read posts. Grow a brain asshole.
>
> >> Yeah, right .... blame Steve Carroll for the discontinuation of Comcast
> >> Usenet as if it were his fault, even though it was a Comcast business
> >> decision. Poor wittle troll was picked on by Steve and had its wittle
> >> feelings hurt, so it must crosspost to receive comfort from COLA, Usenet
> >> kook, accoustic guitar, pro-wrestling and UK media trolls, I suppose.
>
>
> > Comcast made it clear that the reason they made their business decision is
> > that Steve and a small number of others made it not worth it for them to
> > offer the service. They were spending too many resources to make it worth
> > it for them. As even Steve has now admitted, though he denied it in the
> > past, Comcast and he had talks and he felt the need to try to defend
> > himself. He failed. His Usenet access was dropped and, apparently, he then
> > got another account from them (though at the same house? Not sure how that
> > works - just going on what others have said). Whatever the details are,
> > Comcast then decided that it was not in their interest to keep Usenet
> > services. Steve was a part of a very small number of Comcast users who
> > ruined it for the majority.
>
> Can't you honestly see just how pathetically stupid you're appearing with
> this garbage you're posting Snit?
>
> According to you (and it's all still there above Snit) Comcast were
> prevented from having a viable business that was worth it to them to
> continue with because of a "very small number of Comcast users", now the
> obvious action for Comcast to take in that position would be to simply
> remove this rogue element and continue with the viable service for what you
> called the "majority"!
>
> minority from the service .... 2) Then closed the whole thing down, 3) Then
> they reinstated at least one of the ones that according to you caused the
> closure of the service in the first place!
>
> is where you say .... "Not sure how that works" and as far as you are
> concerned that sentiment applies to anything associated with reality!
Snit and reality are obviously very far apart;)
Steve Carroll
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> >> that Steve and a small number of others made it not worth it for them to
> >> offer the service. They were spending too many resources to make it worth
> >> it for them. As even Steve has now admitted, though he denied it in the
> >> past, Comcast and he had talks and he felt the need to try to defend
> >> himself. He failed. His Usenet access was dropped and, apparently, he then
> >> got another account from them (though at the same house? Not sure how that
> >> works - just going on what others have said). Whatever the details are,
> >> Comcast then decided that it was not in their interest to keep Usenet
> >> services. Steve was a part of a very small number of Comcast users who
> >> ruined it for the majority.
>
> > Can't you honestly see just how pathetically stupid you're appearing with
> > this garbage you're posting Snit?
>
> > According to you (and it's all still there above Snit) Comcast were
> > prevented from having a viable business that was worth it to them to
> > continue with because of a "very small number of Comcast users", now the
> > obvious action for Comcast to take in that position would be to simply
> > remove this rogue element and continue with the viable service for what you
> > called the "majority"!
>
>
Either you are lying or Comcast lied to you... gee, I wonder which is
the case. LOL!
(snip more of Snit's lies and BS)
Steve Carroll
> On 26/12/08 12:22 PM, in article
> C5799BEC.E65F5%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"> > C57A77A0.A534%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/25/08 7:59 PM:
>
> >> On 26/12/08 12:25 AM, in article
> >> C578F3E4.E64DF%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
> >> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
> >>> "High Plains Thumper" <highplainsthum...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
> >>> gj07r3$e0...@news.motzarella.org on 12/25/08 8:11 AM:
>
> >>>> Snit wrote:
> >>>>> "High Plains Thumper" stated:
> >>>>>> Rhino Plastee (Snit) wrote:
> >>>>>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Of course it is beyond this troll to overcome its
> >>>>>>>> illiteracy with reading headers, just like some of the
> >>>>>>>> idiot trolls in COLA. Then complain about an imaginery
> >>>>>>>> unfairness that has little to do with the discussion at
> >>>>>>>> hand.
>
> >>>>>>>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>
> >>>>>>> Who said Carroll lost all of his Comcast accounts
> >>>>>>> entirely? His headers make if fucking clear as day he is
> >>>>>>> no longer using Comcast Usenet services. Hell, he fucked
> >>>>>>> all Comcast users and now Comcast does not even provide
> >>>>>>> Usenet services. You lie and say I cannot read headers
> >>>>>>> but you can not fucking read posts. Grow a brain asshole.
>
> >>>>>> Yeah, right .... blame Steve Carroll for the discontinuation
> >>>>>> of Comcast Usenet as if it were his fault, even though it
> >>>>>> was a Comcast business decision. Poor wittle troll was
> >>>>>> picked on by Steve and had its wittle feelings hurt, so it
> >>>>>> must crosspost to receive comfort from COLA, Usenet kook,
> >>>>>> accoustic guitar, pro-wrestling and UK media trolls, I
> >>>>>> suppose.
>
> >>>>>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>
> >>>>> decision is that Steve and a small number of others made it
> >>>>> not worth it for them to offer the service. They were
> >>>>> spending too many resources to make it worth it for them. As
> >>>>> even Steve has now admitted, though he denied it in the past,
> >>>>> Comcast and he had talks and he felt the need to try to defend
> >>>>> himself. He failed. His Usenet access was dropped and,
> >>>>> apparently, he then got another account from them (though at
> >>>>> the same house? Not sure how that works - just going on what
> >>>>> others have said). Whatever the details are, Comcast then
> >>>>> decided that it was not in their interest to keep Usenet
> >>>>> services. Steve was a part of a very small number of Comcast
> >>>>> users who ruined it for the majority.
>
> >>>> usenet-access
>
> >>>> orhttp://tinyurl.com/8tpqv9
>
> >>>> [quote]
> >>>> The Big Media companies have been pressuring ISP companies to
> >>>> discontinue their Usenet services, because the MAFIAA simply
> >>>> can't stand the thought that some Internet users might be using a
> >>>> few Usenet newsgroups to share some bootleg copies of tunes and
> >>>> clips.
>
> >>>> It means nothing to either the media cartels or the ISPs that
> >>>> most casual file sharing on Usenet probably doesn't infringe any
> >>>> copyrights, nor that the volume of other very useful content on
> >>>> Usenet is far larger, by several orders of magnitude, than any
> >>>> that is suspect.
>
> >>>> Comcast is just the latest of the large ISPs to buckle under to
> >>>> MAFIAA pressure from the music and movie cartels, but that
> >>>> doesn't mean that they deserve to get away with this.
> >>>> [/quote]
>
> >>>> Similar to the Nazis blaming the Jews for things beyond their control,
> >>>> Snit attempts to blame Steve Carroll, how sad.
>
> >>>> Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
>
>
> >> "Comcast made it clear that the reason they made their business
> >> decision is that Steve and a small number of others made it
>
> >> If you were only able to comprehend not only what others say but what you
>
> >> Notice *the reason they made their business decision* Snit? LOL
>
> >> Now comes your usual back flip where you no longer hold to it being *the
> >> reason* but you now imply that "other business influences" were to blame!
>
> >> Exactly as others have been telling you all along!
>
> >>> Oh.
>
> >> Yup...Oh! :-)
>
> > Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
> > of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>
> of you making claims and then not being able to substantiate them!
I wonder if someone will get to see a document Snit has forged for
this occasion;)
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57AAFE6.A555%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/25/08 11:59 PM:
>
>>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
>>> of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>>
>> Where Snit? Where did they make it clear? This is simply yet another round
>> of you making claims and then not being able to substantiate them!
>
> Comcast made it clear part of the reason for their business decision was
> because of abusers of their system such as Steve Carroll and a few others.
Where Snit? *that* is all you need show, there is no need for your jaundiced
interpretations, but of course that is the one course of action that is not
available to you! LOL
Tattoo Vampire
> Can't say I'm surprised if she does. The Prescott Computer Guy does
> nothing but troll newsgroups all day, every day.
Oh, but he's doing it while working on pooters, or taking a break from
teaching class, LOL.
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
ROTFL at this piss weak excuse for a man known as Snit!
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
That's the beauty of accurate quoting Snit (really you should try it some
time), it makes anyone that argues with it look as pathetically helpless as
they feel, just as you do right now!
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
You said "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:" yet now you don't know
what it was in reference to Snit?
Unlike you where necessary I supply links to quotes that I use Snit, are you
having difficulty clicking on them? LOL
Wally
"Tattoo Vampire" <sit...@this.computer> wrote:
You'll get no argument about those facts from me!
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> I asked Tattoo Vampire the following question... which he snipped:
>
> I have shown, conclusively,
Whenever you start any sentence with "I have shown, conclusively" Snit what
follows after should without doubt be snipped immediately, as those four
words coming from the likes of you disqualify whatever follows from being
believable!
Snit
>> Twist all you want, Wally... and you will!
>
> That's the beauty of accurate quoting Snit (really you should try it some
> time), it makes anyone that argues with it look as pathetically helpless as
> they feel, just as you do right now!
Now go back and read the pages you linked to. Rhino Plastee quotes me... I
commented on it... and you insisted this gave you a license to lie about
both of us.
Please stop lying.
In any case, your real issue has been your disagreement with Comcast over
their using Steve's behavior, and the behavior of other abusers such as him,
as a part of their decision making in regards to dumping Usenet services.
Since you do not think they should, or maybe do not think they even did
(contrary to their own comments), then *call them*. I am not interested in
being in the middle of your debate with them.
--
"Uh... ask me after we ship the next version of Windows [laughs] then I'll
be more open to give you a blunt answer." - Bill Gates
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/gates/>
Snit
>> Call Comcast, Wally. I have no desire to be the middle man in your beef
>> with them.
>
> ROTFL at this piss weak excuse for a man known as Snit!
Your real issue has been your disagreement with Comcast over their using
Steve's behavior, and the behavior of other abusers such as him, as a part
of their decision making in regards to dumping Usenet services. Since you
do not think they should, or maybe do not think they even did (contrary to
their own comments), then *call them*. I am not interested in being in the
middle of your debate with them.
--
"For example, user interfaces are _usually_ better in commercial software.
I'm not saying that this is always true, but in many cases the user
interface to a program is the most important part for a commercial
company..." Linus Torvalds <http://www.tlug.jp/docs/linus.html>
Snit
Your issue has been your disagreement with Comcast over their using Steve's
behavior, and the behavior of other abusers such as him, as a part of their
decision making in regards to dumping Usenet services. Since you do not
think they should, or maybe do not think they even did (contrary to their
own comments), then *call them*. I am not interested in being in the middle
of your debate with them.
--
I think the Apple guys have a very good point when they say we should let
designers lead the definition of the user experience.
Snit
>>> Rhino Plastee states....
>>>
>>> "Clearly this is a bigoted postion you are pushing, Wally".
>>> http://tinyurl.com/6uhx65
>>>
>>> Wally replies....
>>>
>>> "Clearly for your argument to hold up you need to put words in my mouth!
>>> tsk, tsk!"
>>> http://tinyurl.com/9xm9ea
>>>
>>> Snit shoots himself in the foot and replies....
>>>
>>> "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:"
>>> http://tinyurl.com/7hlnq2
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>>
>> What quote of yours was being referenced?
>
> You said "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:" yet now you don't know
> what it was in reference to Snit?
I do. You do not. Or you do and are lying. Who cares which.
> Unlike you where necessary I supply links to quotes that I use Snit, are you
> having difficulty clicking on them? LOL
Now go back and read the pages you linked to. Rhino Plastee quotes me... I
commented on it... and you insisted this gave you a license to lie about
both of us.
Please stop lying.
In any case, your real issue has been your disagreement with Comcast over
their using Steve's behavior, and the behavior of other abusers such as him,
as a part of their decision making in regards to dumping Usenet services.
Since you do not think they should, or maybe do not think they even did
(contrary to their own comments), then *call them*. I am not interested in
being in the middle of your debate with them.
--
But if you are somebody who is not too concerned about price, who is not too
concerned about freedom, I don't think we can say the Linux desktop offers
the very best experience.
Snit
Your real issue has been your disagreement with Comcast over their using
Steve's behavior, and the behavior of other abusers such as him, as a part
of their decision making in regards to dumping Usenet services. Since you
do not think they should, or maybe do not think they even did (contrary to
their own comments), then *call them*. I am not interested in being in the
middle of your debate with them.
--
You really have to give credit to Apple for driving innovation.
Snit
Please stop lying about me.
--
I think the Apple guys have a very good point when they say we should let
designers lead the definition of the user experience.
Snit
>> Twist all you want, Wally... and you will!
>
> That's the beauty of accurate quoting Snit (really you should try it some
> time), it makes anyone that argues with it look as pathetically helpless as
> they feel, just as you do right now!
Keep in mind, Steve Carroll originally denied Comcast even contacted him.
He later said they did and he successfully argued his case.
And yet, Comcast said they handled Steve's worst behavior... and then when
he continued to troll they dumped his Usenet services. Steve got his
service back, reportedly from getting another account, and then Comcast
stopped supporting Usenet completely... and *they* stated it was in part
because of Steve and others who abused their services.
You disagree with their actions... or maybe do not even believe those were
their actions. So what? Why bring me into your disagreement with Comcast?
You have yet to answer that.
--
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters." - Alan Simpson
Tim Adams
wrote:
michael glasser can't support yet another claim. so typical of him.
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
Tim Adams
Tattoo Vampire <sit...@this.computer> wrote:
and zara thinks he is the top troll. so funny.
Snit
teadams$2$0$0$3-38578B.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
12/26/08 6:50 PM:
> In article <gj3ud0$pmr$1...@tattoovampire.motzarella.org>,
> Tattoo Vampire <sit...@this.computer> wrote:
>
>> William Poaster posted:
>>
>>> Can't say I'm surprised if she does. The Prescott Computer Guy does
>>> nothing but troll newsgroups all day, every day.
>>
>> Oh, but he's doing it while working on pooters, or taking a break from
>> teaching class, LOL.
>
> and zara thinks he is the top troll. so funny.
I would agree he has you beat... though you try hard.
--
Satan lives for my sins... now *that* is dedication!
Snit
12/26/08 6:48 PM:
> In article <C57BAB66.E98B%Wa...@wally.world.net>, Wally
> <Wa...@wally.world.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 27/12/08 1:24 AM, in article C57A534D.E67F2%use...@gallopinginsanity.com,
>> "Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
>>> C57AAFE6.A555%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/25/08 11:59 PM:
>>>
>>>>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
>>>>> of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> Where Snit? Where did they make it clear? This is simply yet another round
>>>> of you making claims and then not being able to substantiate them!
>>>
>>> Comcast made it clear part of the reason for their business decision was
>>> because of abusers of their system such as Steve Carroll and a few others.
>>
>> Where Snit? *that* is all you need show, there is no need for your jaundiced
>> interpretations, but of course that is the one course of action that is not
>> available to you! LOL
>
> michael glasser can't support yet another claim. so typical of him.
Keep in mind, Steve Carroll originally denied Comcast even contacted him.
He later said they did and he successfully argued his case.
And yet, Comcast said they handled Steve's worst behavior... and then when
he continued to troll they dumped his Usenet services. Steve got his
service back, reportedly from getting another account, and then Comcast
stopped supporting Usenet completely... and *they* stated it was in part
because of Steve and others who abused their services.
You disagree with their actions... or maybe do not even believe those were
their actions. So what? Why bring me into your disagreement with Comcast?
You have yet to answer that.
--
I know how a jam jar feels...
... full of jam!
Tattoo Vampire
> Please stop lying about me.
You do a really good job lying about yourself.
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner and proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Don't sweat the petty things, pet the sweaty things
Snit
gj42gr$upq$2...@tattoovampire.motzarella.org on 12/26/08 7:05 PM:
> Snit posted:
>
>> Please stop lying about me.
>
> You do a really good job lying about yourself.
Please... quote these lies.
But you will not.
Man, you are pathetic.
--
"If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
Snit
...
>> What quote of yours was being referenced?
>
> You said "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:" yet now you don't know
> what it was in reference to Snit?
I sure do... but you clearly are not willing to admit to it. You have been
busted lying. Again.
> Unlike you where necessary I supply links to quotes that I use Snit, are you
> having difficulty clicking on them? LOL
You snipped. Dishonestly.
In other words, you just proved not even you believe your BS. OK, so you
have been caught lying - the ball is in your court. How will you handle it?
--
I can't say we will succeed at this, but we will make a significant attempt
to elevate the Linux desktop to the point where it is as good or better than
Apple.
Snit
> On 27/12/08 1:24 AM, in article C57A534D.E67F2%use...@gallopinginsanity.com,
Keep in mind, Steve Carroll originally denied Comcast even contacted him.
He later said they did and he successfully argued his case.
And yet, Comcast said they handled Steve's worst behavior... and then when
he continued to troll they dumped his Usenet services. Steve got his
service back, reportedly from getting another account, and then Comcast
stopped supporting Usenet completely... and *they* stated it was in part
because of Steve and others who abused their services.
You disagree with their actions... or maybe do not even believe those were
their actions. So what? Why bring me into your disagreement with Comcast?
You have yet to answer that.
--
It usually takes me more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu
speech. -- Mark Twain
Snit
>> Twist all you want, Wally... and you will!
>
> That's the beauty of accurate quoting Snit (really you should try it some
> time), it makes anyone that argues with it look as pathetically helpless as
> they feel, just as you do right now!
Snit quotes, in part, the following (and evidence for Wally's bigotry, but
that is irrelevant to Wally's current lies):
Snit:
Do you not see the bigotry in your comment?
Wally:
There is no sign of bigotry that can be attributed to my
comments Snit!
Rhino Plastee Comments on Wally's clear bigotry:
How can you say you are not a bigot when you blame the Jewish
race as a whole for the policies of Israel and assume that
someone who does not like those policies must therefore not
like the Jewish race? Clearly this is a bigoted postion you
are pushing, Wally.
Wally denies his obvious bigotry, as quoted by *Snit*:
Clearly for your argument to hold up you need to put words in
my mouth! tsk, tsk!
Snit notes the quotes *he* provided were:
Nope: I quote you directly and in context...
And then later Wally lies about *that* and says:
Proving that High Plains Thumper is correct, Snit does
nymshift as Rhino Plastee.
Whoops... but Rhino Plastee was *clearly* in reference to a quote by Wally
that *Snit* provided. Yup... so when Snit noted that the quote he provided
was provided by Snit, Wally is simply lying to say there was any confusion
about who provided what... except by Wally.
Wally lied to change the topic from his bigotry... and has tripped himself
up, again!
Come on, Wally, not even you can be so stupid as to *still* think your crap
about proving I am someone I am not holds water. Can you? Are you that
stupid?
Wally? Are you so stupid to think your lies are anything but lies? Steve
Carroll got to the point where he could not distinguish between reality and
his trolling lies... are you showing you share his mental illness?
--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.
Wally
C57AD12F.E6978%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57BAD44.E98E%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/26/08 6:00 PM:
>
>>> Twist all you want, Wally... and you will!
>>
>> That's the beauty of accurate quoting Snit (really you should try it some
>> time), it makes anyone that argues with it look as pathetically helpless as
>> they feel, just as you do right now!
>
> Now go back and read the pages you linked to.
Not only have I read them Snit, but unlike you I *was* able to understand
them!
Wally
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57BAC0D.E98C%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/26/08 5:55 PM:
>
>>> Call Comcast, Wally. I have no desire to be the middle man in your beef
>>> with them.
>>
>> ROTFL at this piss weak excuse for a man known as Snit!
>
> Your real issue has been your disagreement with Comcast ...
Nope ...not even close! My only issue is what you are stating on behalf of
Comcast Snit! Comcast cannot be held responsible for *your* lies Snit, nor
for the fact that you cannot produce one shred of evidence showing Comcast
stating what you claim is clear!
Only you can be held responsible for your fantasies Snit no matter how much
you wish it were otherwise!
Wally
C57AD183.E697B%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57BAE5A.E990%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/26/08 6:05 PM:
>
>>>> Rhino Plastee states....
>>>>
>>>> "Clearly this is a bigoted postion you are pushing, Wally".
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/6uhx65
>>>>
>>>> Wally replies....
>>>>
>>>> "Clearly for your argument to hold up you need to put words in my mouth!
>>>> tsk, tsk!"
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/9xm9ea
>>>>
>>>> Snit shoots himself in the foot and replies....
>>>>
>>>> "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:"
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/7hlnq2
>>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>>>
>>> What quote of yours was being referenced?
>>
>> You said "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:" yet now you don't know
>> what it was in reference to Snit?
>
> I do. You do not. Or you do and are lying. Who cares which.
Those that have respect for the truth would care Snit, so I can understand
why you would not!
>
>> Unlike you where necessary I supply links to quotes that I use Snit, are you
>> having difficulty clicking on them? LOL
>
> Now go back and read the pages you linked to. Rhino Plastee quotes me...
There is no quote from you that is being used in the conversation that I
have outlined and linked to Snit....
At http://tinyurl.com/6uhx65 you as Rhino Plastee stated...
"Has Wally even admitted he is talking about the Jewish race? I have seen
the ass tapdance like a monkey around this but he is clearly afraid to admit
to this. Why, Wally, will you not admit you brought up the topic of the
Jewish race?.........
........For someone who is not a bigot, disliking the policies of Isreal
does not extend to disliking the Jewish race.........
.........How can you say you are not a bigot when you blame the Jewish race
as a whole for the policies of Israel and assume that someone who does not
like those policies must therefore not like the Jewish race? Clearly this
is a bigoted postion you are pushing, Wally.........
.........Why would Tim Adams blame you for what Wally did? Had you brought
up the Jewish race earlier in this discussion?"-Rhino Plastee (aka Snit)
Where is this allusive quote from you that you claim Rhino Plastee used
Snit?
Simple fact is that there isn't one, But now of course the entire text can
be considered a Snit quote whilst you used the name Rhino Plastee!
Wally
C57ADA2F.E69A9%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-49F04C.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> 12/26/08 6:48 PM:
>
>> In article <C57BAB66.E98B%Wa...@wally.world.net>, Wally
>> <Wa...@wally.world.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 27/12/08 1:24 AM, in article C57A534D.E67F2%use...@gallopinginsanity.com,
>>> "Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
>>>> C57AAFE6.A555%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/25/08 11:59 PM:
>>>>
>>>>>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a
>>>>>> part
>>>>>> of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where Snit? Where did they make it clear? This is simply yet another round
>>>>> of you making claims and then not being able to substantiate them!
>>>>
>>>> Comcast made it clear part of the reason for their business decision was
>>>> because of abusers of their system such as Steve Carroll and a few others.
>>>
>>> Where Snit? *that* is all you need show, there is no need for your jaundiced
>>> interpretations, but of course that is the one course of action that is not
>>> available to you! LOL
>>
>> michael glasser can't support yet another claim. so typical of him.
>
> Keep in mind, Steve Carroll originally denied Comcast even contacted him.
Even if Steve did deny the contact "originally" how could you possibly know
that contact had taken place at that time?
Don't try and say that Comcast would have taken you into their confidence
and explained what, when or even if they had contacted Steve!
> He later said they did and he successfully argued his case.
There you have it! they took his word over yours as proven by the fact that
Steve retained his Comcast account!
> And yet, Comcast said they handled Steve's worst behavior... and then when
> he continued to troll they dumped his Usenet services. Steve got his
> service back, reportedly from getting another account, and then Comcast
> stopped supporting Usenet completely... and *they* stated it was in part
> because of Steve and others who abused their services.
An opinion which you have been unable to offer any support for, why is that
Snit? LOL
> You disagree with their actions... or maybe do not even believe those were
> their actions. So what? Why bring me into your disagreement with Comcast?
Because you are the one lying and stating that the info contained within the
lie originated from Comcast, they should not be held responsible for your
lies Snit!
> You have yet to answer that.
Because the answer is obvious!
Wally
C57ADF43.E69BE%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57BAE5A.E990%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/26/08 6:05 PM:
>
> ...
>>> What quote of yours was being referenced?
>>
>> You said "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:" yet now you don't know
>> what it was in reference to Snit?
>
> I sure do... but you clearly are not willing to admit to it.
Why would I admit that you do .... When your own question proves that you do
not?
> You have been busted lying. Again.
You are demented Snit!
>
>> Unlike you where necessary I supply links to quotes that I use Snit, are you
>> having difficulty clicking on them? LOL
>
> You snipped. Dishonestly.
*That* is why I make a point of posting links Snit, any one can view those
posts and make their own mind up about any dishonesty.... Which of course
explains nicely why you are always so reluctant to supply links to what you
quote!
>
> In other words, you just proved not even you believe your BS.
It would have to be "other words" Snit as the ones you have used certainly
don't do it!
> OK, so you
> have been caught lying - the ball is in your court. How will you handle it?
As I always do Snit ... I will let reality be my guide, try it sometime!
Wally
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57BAB66.E98B%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/26/08 5:52 PM:
>
>> On 27/12/08 1:24 AM, in article C57A534D.E67F2%use...@gallopinginsanity.com,
>> "Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
>>> C57AAFE6.A555%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/25/08 11:59 PM:
>>>
>>>>> Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve Carroll were a part
>>>>> of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> Where Snit? Where did they make it clear? This is simply yet another round
>>>> of you making claims and then not being able to substantiate them!
>>>
>>> Comcast made it clear part of the reason for their business decision was
>>> because of abusers of their system such as Steve Carroll and a few others.
>>
>> Where Snit? *that* is all you need show, there is no need for your jaundiced
>> interpretations, but of course that is the one course of action that is not
>> available to you! LOL
>
> Keep in mind, ...
Simply answer the question Snit where can I view Comcast stating what you
have claimed on their behalf? It can't possibly get any easier for you to
prove what you say .... One solitary link would do it, why is even that
simple task too hard for you Snit?
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57BAD44.E98E%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/26/08 6:00 PM:
>
>>> Twist all you want, Wally... and you will!
>>
>> That's the beauty of accurate quoting Snit (really you should try it some
>> time), it makes anyone that argues with it look as pathetically helpless as
>> they feel, just as you do right now!
>
> Snit quotes, in part, ...
Whereas Wally supplies the link to the whole exchange which allows any
reader to make up their own mind! yup I get the picture Snit, you still
believe people are as stupid as you need them to be!
William Poaster
> Snit posted:
>
>> Please stop lying about me.
>
> You do a really good job lying about yourself.
Well Michael Snit Glasser claims to have a job, The Prescott Computer Guy,
but unless the 'job' is trolling newsgroups 24/7/52, he has to be lying.
--
No room for the horrors
of Micro$oft here!
-- Stephen Fry - Room 101 --
Tim Adams
wrote:
snit won't understand that simple fact Wally, and you know it. Reality is to
much for him to face.
No ISP is going to point blame on a small group of people for a service they
offered all users, especially mentioning individuals by name, as that would open
them up to a big law suit.
The fact that michael glasser is (or at least was) a comcast user and they took
his usenet access away due to his trolling years ago is proof of that.
>
> > He later said they did and he successfully argued his case.
>
> There you have it! they took his word over yours as proven by the fact that
> Steve retained his Comcast account!
>
> > And yet, Comcast said they handled Steve's worst behavior... and then when
> > he continued to troll they dumped his Usenet services. Steve got his
> > service back, reportedly from getting another account, and then Comcast
> > stopped supporting Usenet completely... and *they* stated it was in part
> > because of Steve and others who abused their services.
>
> An opinion which you have been unable to offer any support for, why is that
> Snit? LOL
>
> > You disagree with their actions... or maybe do not even believe those were
> > their actions. So what? Why bring me into your disagreement with Comcast?
>
> Because you are the one lying and stating that the info contained within the
> lie originated from Comcast, they should not be held responsible for your
> lies Snit!
>
> > You have yet to answer that.
>
> Because the answer is obvious!
--
Snit
Snit quotes, in part, the following (and evidence for Wally's bigotry, but
that is irrelevant to Wally's current lies):
Snit:
Do you not see the bigotry in your comment?
Wally:
There is no sign of bigotry that can be attributed to my
comments Snit!
Rhino Plastee Comments on Wally's clear bigotry:
How can you say you are not a bigot when you blame the Jewish
race as a whole for the policies of Israel and assume that
someone who does not like those policies must therefore not
like the Jewish race? Clearly this is a bigoted postion you
are pushing, Wally.
Wally denies his obvious bigotry, as quoted by *Snit*:
Clearly for your argument to hold up you need to put words in
my mouth! tsk, tsk!
Snit notes the quotes *he* provided were:
Nope: I quote you directly and in context...
And then later Wally lies about *that* and says:
Proving that High Plains Thumper is correct, Snit does
nymshift as Rhino Plastee.
Whoops... but Rhino Plastee was *clearly* in reference to a quote by Wally
that *Snit* provided. Yup... so when Snit noted that the quote he provided
was provided by Snit, Wally is simply lying to say there was any confusion
about who provided what... except by Wally.
Wally lied to change the topic from his bigotry... and has tripped himself
up, again!
Come on, Wally, not even you can be so stupid as to *still* think your crap
about proving I am someone I am not holds water. Can you? Are you that
stupid?
Wally? Are you so stupid to think your lies are anything but lies? Steve
Carroll got to the point where he could not distinguish between reality and
his trolling lies... are you showing you share his mental illness?
--
Computers are incredibly fast, accurate, and stupid: humans are incredibly
slow, inaccurate and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond
imagination. - attributed to Albert Einstein, likely apocryphal
Snit
Keep in mind, Steve Carroll originally denied Comcast even contacted him.
He later said they did and he successfully argued his case.
And yet, Comcast said they handled Steve's worst behavior... and then when
he continued to troll they dumped his Usenet services. Steve got his
service back, reportedly from getting another account, and then Comcast
stopped supporting Usenet completely... and *they* stated it was in part
because of Steve and others who abused their services.
You disagree with their actions... or maybe do not even believe those were
their actions. So what? Why bring me into your disagreement with Comcast?
You have yet to answer that.
Snit
Snit quotes, in part, the following (and evidence for Wally's bigotry, but
that is irrelevant to Wally's current lies):
Snit:
Do you not see the bigotry in your comment?
Wally:
There is no sign of bigotry that can be attributed to my
comments Snit!
Rhino Plastee Comments on Wally's clear bigotry:
How can you say you are not a bigot when you blame the Jewish
race as a whole for the policies of Israel and assume that
someone who does not like those policies must therefore not
like the Jewish race? Clearly this is a bigoted postion you
are pushing, Wally.
Wally denies his obvious bigotry, as quoted by *Snit*:
Clearly for your argument to hold up you need to put words in
my mouth! tsk, tsk!
Snit notes the quotes *he* provided were:
Nope: I quote you directly and in context...
And then later Wally lies about *that* and says:
Proving that High Plains Thumper is correct, Snit does
nymshift as Rhino Plastee.
Whoops... but Rhino Plastee was *clearly* in reference to a quote by Wally
that *Snit* provided. Yup... so when Snit noted that the quote he provided
was provided by Snit, Wally is simply lying to say there was any confusion
about who provided what... except by Wally.
Wally lied to change the topic from his bigotry... and has tripped himself
up, again!
Come on, Wally, not even you can be so stupid as to *still* think your crap
about proving I am someone I am not holds water. Can you? Are you that
stupid?
Wally? Are you so stupid to think your lies are anything but lies? Steve
Carroll got to the point where he could not distinguish between reality and
his trolling lies... are you showing you share his mental illness?
--
Snit
--
Never stand between a dog and the hydrant. - John Peers
Me
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C57BAEFC.E991%Wa...@wally.world.net on 12/26/08 6:07 PM:
>
>> On 27/12/08 8:45 AM, in article gj3qam$i7h$5...@tattoovampire.motzarella.org,
>> "Tattoo Vampire" <sit...@this.computer> wrote:
>>
>>> Wally posted:
>>>
>>>> Snit shoots himself in the foot and replies....
>>>>
>>>> "Nope: I quote you directly and in context:" http://tinyurl.com/7hlnq2
>>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>> Snit is a cross-posting troll who uses multiple aliases.
>> You'll get no argument about those facts from me!
>>
>
> Your real issue has been your disagreement with Comcast over their using
> Steve's behavior, and the behavior of other abusers such as him, as a part
> of their decision making in regards to dumping Usenet services. Since you
> do not think they should, or maybe do not think they even did (contrary to
> their own comments), then *call them*. I am not interested in being in the
> middle of your debate with them.
You ought to be taking care of your new dog instead of posting here.
Neglect can be prosecuted under animal cruelty laws. Just a head's up
for you.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Snit
--
Snit
Keep in mind, Steve Carroll originally denied Comcast even contacted him.
He later said they did and he successfully argued his case.
And yet, Comcast said they handled Steve's worst behavior... and then when
he continued to troll they dumped his Usenet services. Steve got his
service back, reportedly from getting another account, and then Comcast
stopped supporting Usenet completely... and *they* stated it was in part
because of Steve and others who abused their services.
You disagree with their actions... or maybe do not even believe those were
their actions. So what? Why bring me into your disagreement with Comcast?
You have yet to answer that.
--
The fact that OS X is growing and Linux isn't, tells you that OS X is
offering things that Linux is not.
Snit
--
Snit
12/27/08 7:02 AM:
And yet, Comcast said they handled Steve's worst behavior... and then when
he continued to troll they dumped his Usenet services. Steve got his
service back, reportedly from getting another account, and then Comcast
stopped supporting Usenet completely... and *they* stated it was in part
because of Steve and others who abused their services.
You disagree with their actions... or maybe do not even believe those were
their actions. So what? Why bring me into your disagreement with Comcast?
You have yet to answer that.
--
The direct use of physical force is so poor a solution to the problem of
limited resources that it is commonly employed only by small children and
great nations. - David Friedman
Snit
12/27/08 8:13 AM:
What does that drivel have to do with Comcast?
--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.
Wally
C57B9588.E6B0C%use...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit"
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
What does yours? LOL