Caught Steve Mackay in *another* big lie
Snit
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
Notice how this is from mackay's website. Notice how he has the file titled
"email_snit_lie1.pdf".
Now look at the PDF. Closely. Look for where it says:
(unverified [24.117.214.36])
This is supposedly in reference to an unverified IP that the e-mail was
supposedly sent from.
Look real carefully at the IP though. Zoom in if you have to. Look at the
font for that IP vs. the font for the IP above it.
I have a zoomed version of that section, here:
http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/csma/zoom_of_mackay_lie.pdf
This is nothing more than a zoomed in screen shot from mackay's site. Get
the original before he removes it.
Ok... hopefully you have it. Hold onto it. Do not throw it away. As many
people as possible should have a copy of this.
Now look at the font. The 24 for the lower IP is clearly different than the
font for the upper IP. The two bends down more, the 4 is "sharper". The
6's in the two IP's are also clearly different. While not in my zoomed
image, the 7s are also clearly different... and it is that IP... and only
that IP... that has the different font.
Again, *before* Steve can claim I edited the screen shot, get the PDF from
*his* site.
The more people who grab a copy the more evidence that he is clearly lying.
I also notice that the font difference has been corrected... as if by
magic... on this copy *also* on his site:
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
Hmmm.... why the change? Did hotmail suddenly change fonts.
I look forward to hearing what stories Steve tells about this one.
Red handed, Steve... you have been caught. And, for that matter, you, too,
Sandman. You claimed to have verified it.
How do you explain the different font?
--
"If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law."
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://smallurl.com/?i=15235)
Steve Mackay
> Before he can change it, click on the following link:
>
> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
Why would I change anything? This is what *YOU* had on your site. It
was downloaded FROM YOU. I'm sure you'll deny it. But if anyone else
had downloaded email.pdf from your site, prior to this afternoon can
clearly tell you're lying.
>
> Notice how this is from mackay's website. Notice how he has the file titled
> "email_snit_lie1.pdf".
>
> Now look at the PDF. Closely. Look for where it says:
>
> (unverified [24.117.214.36])
>
> This is supposedly in reference to an unverified IP that the e-mail was
> supposedly sent from.
>
> Look real carefully at the IP though. Zoom in if you have to. Look at the
> font for that IP vs. the font for the IP above it.
>
> I have a zoomed version of that section, here:
>
> http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/csma/zoom_of_mackay_lie.pdf
>
> This is nothing more than a zoomed in screen shot from mackay's site. Get
> the original before he removes it.
Sure, of the PDF *YOU* created, that I earlier downlaoded from YOUR
site. What's your point? Besides showing how YOU tried to make it look
like I had edited. But I caught you before you could complete your
conspiracy. :)
>
> Ok... hopefully you have it. Hold onto it. Do not throw it away. As many
> people as possible should have a copy of this.
Why to prove you're a lying sack of shit, caught trying to say I've
modified this? Sorry, ain't gonna work. This is why the 1st creator on
YOUR site was OmniGraffle, wasn't it. You tried to edit it. LOL! I
caught you, and you changed it again. As evident by the date on the PDFs
So, really, if that's the case, if anyone had downloaded Snit's version
of the email.pdf prior to this afternoon from Snit's site, wanna take a
look at their PDF, and find the creator and creation date. It's easy to
see, Snit is a pathalogical liar.
>
> Now look at the font. The 24 for the lower IP is clearly different than the
> font for the upper IP. The two bends down more, the 4 is "sharper". The
> 6's in the two IP's are also clearly different. While not in my zoomed
> image, the 7s are also clearly different... and it is that IP... and only
> that IP... that has the different font.
>
> Again, *before* Steve can claim I edited the screen shot, get the PDF from
> *his* site.
>
> The more people who grab a copy the more evidence that he is clearly lying.
>
> I also notice that the font difference has been corrected... as if by
> magic... on this copy *also* on his site:
>
> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
>
> Hmmm.... why the change? Did hotmail suddenly change fonts.
Hey, Snit, sorry to burst your bubble, but that one has been up there
since June 13th. It's the original. The other 2 you edited, to try and
say I am trying to forge something. You fool no one.
It's easy to verify. Just look at the creation dates on the PDFs.
Also, look at the directory of the site and see when they were all uploaded.
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/
>
>
>
> I look forward to hearing what stories Steve tells about this one.
>
> Red handed, Steve... you have been caught. And, for that matter, you, too,
> Sandman. You claimed to have verified it.
>
> How do you explain the different font?
You did it. How else? I didn't need to change anything. The same one is
up there, that has been up there for about 2 months.
Snit
2004081122085275249%stevemackay@hotmailcom on 8/11/04 10:08 PM:
Not surprised to see you try to work out some story. Here, let me give you
a full chance... this should be good.
Lay out the time line... tell us all what you did and what I did... from the
day you got an e-mail from me.
Tell us all. Should be good for a laugh or two.
Snit
2004081122085275249%stevemackay@hotmailcom on 8/11/04 10:08 PM:
> On 2004-08-11 18:44:57 -0700, Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> said:
>
>> Before he can change it, click on the following link:
>>
>> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
>
>
> Why would I change anything? This is what *YOU* had on your site. It
> was downloaded FROM YOU. I'm sure you'll deny it. But if anyone else
> had downloaded email.pdf from your site, prior to this afternoon can
> clearly tell you're lying.
Yeah... Steve Carroll has hinted he has all the saupport you need. Tee hee.
You forget... this came from *your* website ya' dope. Are you now storing
evidence against yourself there that you claim I fabricated?
Keep digging.
>
>>
>> Notice how this is from mackay's website. Notice how he has the file titled
>> "email_snit_lie1.pdf".
>>
>> Now look at the PDF. Closely. Look for where it says:
>>
>> (unverified [24.117.214.36])
>>
>> This is supposedly in reference to an unverified IP that the e-mail was
>> supposedly sent from.
>>
>> Look real carefully at the IP though. Zoom in if you have to. Look at the
>> font for that IP vs. the font for the IP above it.
>>
>> I have a zoomed version of that section, here:
>>
>> http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/csma/zoom_of_mackay_lie.pdf
>>
>> This is nothing more than a zoomed in screen shot from mackay's site. Get
>> the original before he removes it.
>
> Sure, of the PDF *YOU* created, that I earlier downlaoded from YOUR
> site. What's your point? Besides showing how YOU tried to make it look
> like I had edited. But I caught you before you could complete your
> conspiracy. :)
Where did *you* catch *your* own edits. Link to the post. As far as I
know, *nobody* had mentioned your font error until I did.
Point to the post which comments on your font error. Enjoy.
Red handed Steve... you have been caught. Time for you to fess up.
>
>>
>> Ok... hopefully you have it. Hold onto it. Do not throw it away. As many
>> people as possible should have a copy of this.
>
> Why to prove you're a lying sack of shit, caught trying to say I've
> modified this? Sorry, ain't gonna work. This is why the 1st creator on
> YOUR site was OmniGraffle, wasn't it. You tried to edit it. LOL! I
> caught you, and you changed it again. As evident by the date on the PDFs
Um, I did not even check the creator on the PDF from your site. Can not say
I care how you created it... all I care about is the font you clearly
changed... and the text that was replaced.
>
> So, really, if that's the case, if anyone had downloaded Snit's version
> of the email.pdf prior to this afternoon from Snit's site, wanna take a
> look at their PDF, and find the creator and creation date. It's easy to
> see, Snit is a pathalogical liar.
Please... anyone who has the one from my site please speak up. You can get
it here:
http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/csma/email.pdf
That is the original one from Steve. Anyone who has a copy can look and see
your font is messed up.
Hell, probably on Google's archives.
>
>>
>> Now look at the font. The 24 for the lower IP is clearly different than the
>> font for the upper IP. The two bends down more, the 4 is "sharper". The
>> 6's in the two IP's are also clearly different. While not in my zoomed
>> image, the 7s are also clearly different... and it is that IP... and only
>> that IP... that has the different font.
>>
>> Again, *before* Steve can claim I edited the screen shot, get the PDF from
>> *his* site.
>>
>> The more people who grab a copy the more evidence that he is clearly lying.
>>
>> I also notice that the font difference has been corrected... as if by
>> magic... on this copy *also* on his site:
>>
>> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
>>
>> Hmmm.... why the change? Did hotmail suddenly change fonts.
>
>
> Hey, Snit, sorry to burst your bubble, but that one has been up there
> since June 13th. It's the original. The other 2 you edited, to try and
> say I am trying to forge something. You fool no one.
> It's easy to verify. Just look at the creation dates on the PDFs.
LOL. Wow... you must be a computer god... to be able to change creation
dates. LOL.
>
> Also, look at the directory of the site and see when they were all uploaded.
>
> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/
Uh, yeah... that is where I got it from. How long until you take your
original PDF down... LOL.
Busted Steve... you are completely busted.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> I look forward to hearing what stories Steve tells about this one.
>>
>> Red handed, Steve... you have been caught. And, for that matter, you, too,
>> Sandman. You claimed to have verified it.
>>
>> How do you explain the different font?
>
> You did it. How else? I didn't need to change anything. The same one is
> up there, that has been up there for about 2 months.
How did I change the font on your site?
Why would I change the font? Oh yes, to frame you. I edited a PDF and then
broke into you web site and uploaded it.
BS Steve. You have been caught... deal with it.
Snit
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
Notice how this is from mackay's website. Notice how he has the file titled
"email_snit_lie1.pdf".
Now look at the PDF. Closely. Look for where it says:
(unverified [24.117.214.36])
This is supposedly in reference to an unverified IP that the e-mail was
supposedly sent from.
Look real carefully at the IP though. Zoom in if you have to. Look at the
font for that IP vs. the font for the IP above it.
I have a zoomed version of that section, here:
http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/csma/zoom_of_mackay_lie.pdf
This is nothing more than a zoomed in screen shot from mackay's site. Get
the original before he removes it.
Ok... hopefully you have it. Hold onto it. Do not throw it away. As many
people as possible should have a copy of this.
Now look at the font. The 24 for the lower IP is clearly different than the
font for the upper IP. The two bends down more, the 4 is "sharper". The
6's in the two IP's are also clearly different. While not in my zoomed
image, the 7s are also clearly different... and it is that IP... and only
that IP... that has the different font.
Again, *before* Steve can claim I edited the screen shot, get the PDF from
*his* site.
The more people who grab a copy the more evidence that he is clearly lying.
I also notice that the font difference has been corrected... as if by
magic... on this copy *also* on his site:
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
Hmmm.... why the change? Did hotmail suddenly change fonts.
I look forward to hearing what stories Steve tells about this one.
Red handed, Steve... you have been caught. And, for that matter, you, too,
Sandman. You claimed to have verified it.
How do you explain the different font?
Sandman
Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
> Before he can change it, click on the following link:
>
> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
Michael links to his own PDF on Steves site. Haha!
--
Sandman[.net]
Tim Smith
> Before he can change it, click on the following link:
>
> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
> I also notice that the font difference has been corrected... as if by
> magic... on this copy *also* on his site:
>
> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
>
> Hmmm.... why the change? Did hotmail suddenly change fonts.
Since email.pdf is the older file, it is hard to see how it has been
corrected, unless Steve has developed some form of backward time travel.
--
--Tim Smith
Snit
Z1OSc.22476$Jp6....@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net on 8/12/04 10:46 AM:
Well, he has claimed to be able to go back in time over 7 hours and find
proof for files that do not yet exist.
Steve Mackay
> "Tim Smith" <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> wrote in
> Z1OSc.22476$Jp6....@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net on 8/12/04 10:46 AM:
>
>> On 2004-08-12, Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
>>> Before he can change it, click on the following link:
>>>
>>> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
>> ...
>>> I also notice that the font difference has been corrected... as if by
>>> magic... on this copy *also* on his site:
>>>
>>> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
>>>
>>> Hmmm.... why the change? Did hotmail suddenly change fonts.
>>
>> Since email.pdf is the older file, it is hard to see how it has been
>> corrected, unless Steve has developed some form of backward time travel.
>
> Well, he has claimed to be able to go back in time over 7 hours and find
> proof for files that do not yet exist.
No, that's your lie, and conspiracy theory. Other people realize the
truth. You're not fooling anyone, sockpuppet boy.
Snit
Explain, please, how you went back in time 7 hours.
Even if I hacked your site and uploaded the images, as you seem to claim,
the date would probably not be based on *my* date... and if it were, where
am I that is 8 hours or more different than you?
Listen, you have been caught red handed. Give it up already.
Someone said they were going to deconstruct the PDF in question and find the
original IP. I look forward to seeing that being done.
Do you? :)
Steve Mackay
> "Steve Mackay" <steve_...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> pan.2004.08.12....@hotmail.com on 8/12/04 10:54 AM:
>
>> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:49:55 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> "Tim Smith" <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> wrote in
>>> Z1OSc.22476$Jp6....@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net on 8/12/04 10:46 AM:
>>>
>>>> On 2004-08-12, Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
>>>>> Before he can change it, click on the following link:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
>>>> ...
>>>>> I also notice that the font difference has been corrected... as if by
>>>>> magic... on this copy *also* on his site:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm.... why the change? Did hotmail suddenly change fonts.
>>>>
>>>> Since email.pdf is the older file, it is hard to see how it has been
>>>> corrected, unless Steve has developed some form of backward time travel.
>>>
>>> Well, he has claimed to be able to go back in time over 7 hours and find
>>> proof for files that do not yet exist.
>>
>> No, that's your lie, and conspiracy theory. Other people realize the
>> truth. You're not fooling anyone, sockpuppet boy.
>>
> Explain, please, how you went back in time 7 hours.
I didn't.
>
> Even if I hacked your site and uploaded the images, as you seem to claim,
> the date would probably not be based on *my* date... and if it were, where
> am I that is 8 hours or more different than you?
Where did I *EVER* say, or even HINT that you "hacked" my site. I've been
over this with you already. I put those PDFs on my RR site last night. The
date/time shows when I *UPLOADED* them. You're looking more and more like
the fool you are by continuing this line of conspiracy theories. I'd give
up now if I were you, before you look like a bigger fool.
> Listen, you have been caught red handed. Give it up already.
No, you're lying again mikey.
>
> Someone said they were going to deconstruct the PDF in question and find the
> original IP. I look forward to seeing that being done.
>
> Do you? :)
Of course. I don't have anything to hide. The deconstructed PDF will be
exactly as I have my email.pdf on my site.
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
That's the original. Always has been. Never been edited. Now the other two
PDFs up there have been edited by you, downloaded from your site, and
reuploaded to mine, for all to see last night.
Snit
LOL.... what a silly troll you are.
Please read your posts from the last 24 hours. Can you find the big gaping
hole in your story?
Your are flip flopping like a fish out of water.
"Steve Mackay" <steve_...@hotmail.com> wrote in
pan.2004.08.12....@hotmail.com on 8/12/04 11:01 AM:
Steve Mackay
> Wow... Steve... can you find your flip flops?
>
> LOL.... what a silly troll you are.
>
> Please read your posts from the last 24 hours. Can you find the big gaping
> hole in your story?
No, but I'm sure you'll make something up. You're not very good at it
though.
>
> Your are flip flopping like a fish out of water.
Nahh, that's your job.
Tim Smith
> Even if I hacked your site and uploaded the images, as you seem to claim,
Stop lying. He never claimed that. He never implied that. He never said
anything that anyone could even remotely read as even hinting at that.
He posted a PDF. It showed you were lying. You copied the PDF, edited it
(poorly, using different software than he uses) to make it look like it had
been altered, and put it up on your site. He copied that to his site.
> the date would probably not be based on *my* date... and if it were, where
> am I that is 8 hours or more different than you?
You may want to investigate a phenomenon called a "time zone".
--
--Tim Smith
Snit
I would love to see your explanation of how a time zone would account for
the 7 1/2 hour difference.
Have fun.
Bet you that you can not do it.
Snit
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:15:53 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Wow... Steve... can you find your flip flops?
>>
>> LOL.... what a silly troll you are.
>>
>> Please read your posts from the last 24 hours. Can you find the big gaping
>> hole in your story?
>
> No, but I'm sure you'll make something up. You're not very good at it
> though.
You are much better at making things up. I agree that I am not... you just
have more practice.
>
>>
>> Your are flip flopping like a fish out of water.
>
> Nahh, that's your job.
Wow... what an utterly powerful reply you have.
I notice you do not even comment on your flip flopping.
Snit
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
Notice how this is from mackay's website. Notice how he has the file titled
"email_snit_lie1.pdf".
Now look at the PDF. Closely. Look for where it says:
(unverified [24.117.214.36])
This is supposedly in reference to an unverified IP that the e-mail was
supposedly sent from.
Look real carefully at the IP though. Zoom in if you have to. Look at the
font for that IP vs. the font for the IP above it.
I have a zoomed version of that section, here:
http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/csma/zoom_of_mackay_lie.pdf
This is nothing more than a zoomed in screen shot from mackay's site. Get
the original before he removes it.
Ok... hopefully you have it. Hold onto it. Do not throw it away. As many
people as possible should have a copy of this.
Now look at the font. The 24 for the lower IP is clearly different than the
font for the upper IP. The two bends down more, the 4 is "sharper". The
6's in the two IP's are also clearly different. While not in my zoomed
image, the 7s are also clearly different... and it is that IP... and only
that IP... that has the different font.
Again, *before* Steve can claim I edited the screen shot, get the PDF from
*his* site.
The more people who grab a copy the more evidence that he is clearly lying.
I also notice that the font difference has been corrected... as if by
magic... on this copy *also* on his site:
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email.pdf
Hmmm.... why the change? Did hotmail suddenly change fonts.
I look forward to hearing what stories Steve tells about this one.
Red handed, Steve... you have been caught. And, for that matter, you, too,
Sandman. You claimed to have verified it.
How do you explain the different font?
ed
Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> typed:
> "Tim Smith" <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> wrote in
> 2JPSc.22564$Jp6....@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net on 8/12/04
> 12:40 PM:
>
>> On 2004-08-12, Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
>>> Even if I hacked your site and uploaded the images, as you seem to
>>> claim,
>>
>> Stop lying. He never claimed that. He never implied that. He
>> never said anything that anyone could even remotely read as even
>> hinting at that.
>>
>> He posted a PDF. It showed you were lying. You copied the PDF,
>> edited it (poorly, using different software than he uses) to make it
>> look like it had been altered, and put it up on your site. He
>> copied that to his site.
>>
>>> the date would probably not be based on *my* date... and if it
>>> were, where am I that is 8 hours or more different than you?
>>
>> You may want to investigate a phenomenon called a "time zone".
>>
> I would love to see your explanation of how a time zone would account
> for the 7 1/2 hour difference.
>
> Have fun.
>
> Bet you that you can not do it.
um, do you want to think about that a little harder, or would you like
someone to spell it out and embarrass you a little more?
Sandman
Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
> Before he can change it, click on the following link:
>
> http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
Your forged PDF.
--
Sandman[.net]
Snit
http://home.wi.rr.com/mackays/email_snit_lie1.pdf
Notice how this is from mackay's website. Notice how he has the file titled
Alan Baker
Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
Because you changed it, hoping to create this way of impeaching the
veracity of the email. If Steve had changed it, it would have had a
different email beneath, but it doesn't.
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
Snit
alangbaker-44172...@news.telus.net on 8/13/04 10:18 PM:
I would like to see evidence of this. While I think it is possible that
Steve edited it to have the same IP with a different font, it makes no sense
unless he were doing it to frame me.
Alan Baker
Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
Wrong. It makes no sense for him to do it, but it makes all kinds of
sense for *you* to do it.
Snit
Are you suggesting that if the IP is the same underneath it looks *good* for
me. Of course not. Since he and I both knew that someone would be able to
rip the file apart, there is no sense in me making myself look bad... and
all the reason in the world for him to.
While we are on the topic of faked files: why do you think Steve fakes the
snit.jpg on his site? I do not think he even claims to have gotten that
one from me, yet it is clearly a fake.
I look forward to hearing his answer on this one.
Steve Carroll
Possible? You have already created a thread stating that he did this.
Where is YOUR proof?
> that
> Steve edited it to have the same IP with a different font, it makes no sense
> unless he were doing it to frame me.
You think everyone is as disingenuous as you. Boy, have you missed the
boat with your whacko projections. Even if Steve WAS like you, at this
point, he knows he doesn't need to try and frame you... no need to take
such a risk. If there is any question of who did something disingenuous
between the two of you, people are GOING to believe him... even if he's
lying. Just one of the perks of a ruined credibility. Unfortunately, for
you, this isn't left up to question. You stepped on your dick so hard
with that track shoe that you left an imprint this time.
--
"I may just be the primary topic of this group"
"You really need to learn the whole concept of context"
- Michael Glasser (AKA Snit)
--
Steve C
Steve Mackay
A track shoe? No, he ran over it with a dump truck! Even Tim Smith has
caught him changing it yet a 3rd time, LOL WAY WAY WAY funny!
Oh, yeah, and he keeps changing email.pdf on his site. He re-uploaded
it this morning :)
steve2% telnet myweb.cableone.net 80
Trying 24.116.1.130...
Connected to myweb.cableone.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD /snit/csma/email.pdf HTTP/1.1
Host: myweb.cableone.net
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Microsoft-IIS/4.0
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:18:10 GMT
Content-Type: application/pdf
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Last-Modified: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 06:32:17 GMT
ETag: "1a5cc171c881c41:18e0"
Content-Length: 310396
See the last modified date on the file? Why would it be from this
morning do you suppose?
This is too funny for words to describe.
Steve Mackay
Want to tell us all why you keep changing email.pdf on your site?
steve2% telnet myweb.cableone.net 80
Trying 24.116.1.130...
Connected to myweb.cableone.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD /snit/csma/email.pdf HTTP/1.1
Host: myweb.cableone.net
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Microsoft-IIS/4.0
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:18:10 GMT
Content-Type: application/pdf
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Last-Modified: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 06:32:17 GMT
ETag: "1a5cc171c881c41:18e0"
Content-Length: 310396
What's wrong mikey? You have to keep changing things, to try and fool people?
But the problem is, there have been far too many people watching this
scenerio go down, yet you're not bright enough to just walk away from
it all after being caught.
Snit
Wow... this is a new claim so I suppose I will respond.
First, though, when I show you to be making up more stories will you admit
you have been lying? If not, what is the point of my pointing out your
error... one I assume is purposeful?
Steve Mackay
Sure, I'll bite. What's your new explaination?
Snit
So you will admit to lying when I point to your error.... just to be certain
I want to make sure we are in agreement.
Steve Mackay
Well, I was going to bate you and say sure. But I just can't. I wasn't
lying, and I wont lie, just to hear another one of your conspiracy
theories.
Steve Carroll
Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
Why should he admit to lying if he made an error? LOL! Put down the glue
and bag, Snit:)
Snit
fretwizz-86690D...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/14/04 8:40 AM:
>> So you will admit to lying when I point to your error.... just to be certain
>> I want to make sure we are in agreement.
>
> Why should he admit to lying if he made an error? LOL! Put down the glue
> and bag, Snit:)
His error is thinking his lies made sense.
Steve Mackay did, however, finally admit that even when I point out his lies
he does not admit to them.
Then he killfiled me.
I think that is for the best.
So, Steve Carroll, what do you think I am guilty of? LOL.
We can always go back to your focusing on your pack of lies on that topic...
you know... the real reason you hate me. :)
Steve Carroll
Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in
> fretwizz-86690D...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/14/04 8:40 AM:
>
> >> So you will admit to lying when I point to your error.... just to be
> >> certain
> >> I want to make sure we are in agreement.
> >
> > Why should he admit to lying if he made an error? LOL! Put down the glue
> > and bag, Snit:)
>
> His error is thinking his lies made sense.
>
> Steve Mackay did, however, finally admit that even when I point out his lies
> he does not admit to them.
>
> Then he killfiled me.
>
> I think that is for the best.
>
> So, Steve Carroll, what do you think I am guilty of? LOL.
I think you're guilty of being a NG rapist, moron, and disingenuous,
lying sack of shit. Other than that, I have no problem with you driving
away the people in this NG that won't do anything about you:)
> We can always go back to your focusing on your pack of lies on that topic...
> you know... the real reason you hate me. :)
Where have I ever said I hated you? You're projecting again, Snit. What
topic?
Snit
> In article <BD438277.5C491%snit-...@cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in
>> fretwizz-86690D...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/14/04 8:40 AM:
>>
>>>> So you will admit to lying when I point to your error.... just to be
>>>> certain
>>>> I want to make sure we are in agreement.
>>>
>>> Why should he admit to lying if he made an error? LOL! Put down the glue
>>> and bag, Snit:)
>>
>> His error is thinking his lies made sense.
>>
>> Steve Mackay did, however, finally admit that even when I point out his lies
>> he does not admit to them.
>>
>> Then he killfiled me.
>>
>> I think that is for the best.
>>
>> So, Steve Carroll, what do you think I am guilty of? LOL.
>
> I think you're guilty of being a NG rapist, moron, and disingenuous,
> lying sack of shit. Other than that, I have no problem with you driving
> away the people in this NG that won't do anything about you:)
Please define the word "guilty".
LOL.
>
>> We can always go back to your focusing on your pack of lies on that topic...
>> you know... the real reason you hate me. :)
>
> Where have I ever said I hated you? You're projecting again, Snit. What
> topic?
Yeah... you just call me a rapist. Are people you think are rapists the
type people you like?
Krinkle Frys
Your comments are made solely to offend, though they are at least supported.
Krinkle Frys
Your comments are made solely to offend.
Steve Carroll
Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in
> fretwizz-FF1850...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/14/04 9:38 AM:
>
> > In article <BD438277.5C491%snit-...@cableone.net>,
> > Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
> >
> >> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in
> >> fretwizz-86690D...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/14/04 8:40 AM:
> >>
> >>>> So you will admit to lying when I point to your error.... just to be
> >>>> certain
> >>>> I want to make sure we are in agreement.
> >>>
> >>> Why should he admit to lying if he made an error? LOL! Put down the glue
> >>> and bag, Snit:)
> >>
> >> His error is thinking his lies made sense.
> >>
> >> Steve Mackay did, however, finally admit that even when I point out his
> >> lies
> >> he does not admit to them.
> >>
> >> Then he killfiled me.
> >>
> >> I think that is for the best.
> >>
> >> So, Steve Carroll, what do you think I am guilty of? LOL.
> >
> > I think you're guilty of being a NG rapist, moron, and disingenuous,
> > lying sack of shit. Other than that, I have no problem with you driving
> > away the people in this NG that won't do anything about you:)
>
> Please define the word "guilty".
Don't you know what the word means YET? Damn you're a slow student.
> LOL.
> >
> >> We can always go back to your focusing on your pack of lies on that
> >> topic...
> >> you know... the real reason you hate me. :)
> >
> > Where have I ever said I hated you? You're projecting again, Snit. What
> > topic?
>
> Yeah... you just call me a rapist. Are people you think are rapists the
> type people you like?
I don't think you are a rapist... nor have I ever said I hated anyone in
csma, including you. That would be like hating a retarded kid (thank the
Mayor for this one)... what's the point?
Krinkle Frys
Krinkle Frys
Snit
Go easy on yourself...
Krinkle Frys
Krinkle Frys
Krinkle Frys
Your comments are made solely to offend, though at least they are supported.
Krinkle Frys
Your comments are made solely to offend.
Krinkle Frys
> In article <BD438277.5C491%snit-...@cableone.net>,
> Snit <snit-...@cableone.net> wrote:
>
>
>>"Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in
>>fretwizz-86690D...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/14/04 8:40 AM:
>>
>>
>>>>So you will admit to lying when I point to your error.... just to be
>>>>certain
>>>>I want to make sure we are in agreement.
>>>
>>>Why should he admit to lying if he made an error? LOL! Put down the glue
>>>and bag, Snit:)
>>
>>His error is thinking his lies made sense.
>>
>>Steve Mackay did, however, finally admit that even when I point out his lies
>>he does not admit to them.
>>
>>Then he killfiled me.
>>
>>I think that is for the best.
>>
>>So, Steve Carroll, what do you think I am guilty of? LOL.
>
>
> I think you're guilty of being a NG rapist, moron, and disingenuous,
> lying sack of shit. Other than that, I have no problem with you driving
> away the people in this NG that won't do anything about you:)
>
>
>>We can always go back to your focusing on your pack of lies on that topic...
>>you know... the real reason you hate me. :)
>
>
> Where have I ever said I hated you? You're projecting again, Snit. What
> topic?
>