Quotes! 14-JAN-2006
CSMA_Moderator
Fact is most csma posters have noticed that Snit is different. Many cola
posters have noticed too. Here is what over 70 different posters have to
say about him.
----- NEW CSMA_MODERATOR'S FAVORITES! -----
fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to CSMA I
have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides the typical
Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like being in a room
of really young children trying there best to best the other person. The
one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like this,
but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a great percentage of
arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more about "look
everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all this picking at each
other on such a personal level. CSMA has always been al little adversarial
but you have personally crank it up to the point that this place is no
longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making this place your own
personal circus."
Jeff B. : "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."
Jim Polaski: "Thanks for starting a three-ring circus act where it wasn't
indicated."
Lars Träger: "Yes, you are stupid."
Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote Mayor
McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell of a
tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of looking
ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's your goal,
you're on the right track, and more power to you."
Stuart Krivis: "Dude, the way you act sometimes makes me think you _like_ to
be fucked with and encourage others to do so."
-------------------------------------------
--------- (DIS)HONORABLE MENTIONS ---------
Alan Baker: "And back you go into the killfile..."
ed: "why must you act as if you're disagreeing w/ a point i'm making if
you're not? weird."
Elizabot v2.0.2: "Now stop following me around the newsgroup and trying to
impress me with your newly discovered knowledge. I don't really care what
you might have to say about the topic."
Sandman: I think it's curious that Michael really has jumped on me since I
removed the killfile (and even when I did have him killfiled) and thrown
all kinds of insults and accusations even though I have treated him very
good. I have kept a good tone from day one and he has been quite the
contrary.
I think it's fun to see his posts about wanting to make "peace" with the
ones that call him troll, when this is what he does without being
provoked :) "
Steve Carroll: "The 'IT teacher' calling itself 'Snit' has been trying to
hack into my computers for over a year and a half with no success (not that
he is representative of a person with a working brain and the capability to
do so). I'm not too worried."
Steve Carroll: "It's also interesting that Snit is talking about me (and
some imaginary "crew") before I (or any of this imagined "crew") even
entered this thread. Of course, it's not as interesting as him stealing my
ID and admitting to it (gee, I wonder if this would meet the "annoying"
requirement) or using multiple sockpuppets and admitting to that... or
writing that sex webpage about you and admitting to that. Amazingly, Snit
is so brain dead that he thinks *he* can use such a law to his advantage.
I'd bet my house that a first year law student could get any case that Snit
could talk a drunken prosecutor into taking on thrown out of court based on
the fact that Snit isn't using his real name and that he antagonizes people
the way he does. Snit would go to court in the morning as the plaintiff and
before lunch he'd be in cuffs standing at the defendant's table. LOL!"
Steve Mackay: "But, to be fair to Snit...
He has given up a large portion of his life to become the best
liar/troll/sockpuppeteer/scumbag that C.S.M.A. has ever seen.
Congrats on a job well done there Snit!!!! "
TheLetterK: "You're not capable of sustaining a decent argument, so it's
best to just have fun at your expense, Shit."
Tim Adams: "Steve - I found it real interesting the snit kept track and knew
when you (and Elizabot) stopped posting around the holidays and then
started up again. And he says the two of you are obsessed with him. More
like he's stalking the two of you."
Wally: "If Sandman made any mistake at all it was in responding to you in an
extremely honest way, this will always be a danger when dealing with
someone such as yourself that has such a tenuous grasp on reality, where
you see such honesty as a weakness to be exploited! fortunately the vast
majority in this place have no such leanings!"
------------------------------------------------------------
----------- CSMA_MODERATOR'S ALL TIME FAVORITES! -----------
1- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour and
not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave too.
Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I have never
made the same wish of him."
2- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you are
flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the newsgroup."
3- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
troll. Otherwise, maybe.
Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but it's fixed now."
4- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but since
Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent discussion
about anything.
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people just
can't stop feeding him."
5- °b° unny: "snit makes me sad."
6- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
7- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him "shit", and rightly so, for they way
he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and simply
refused to die, despite repeated flushes.
It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..."
8- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility.
Maybe it's time for you to learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming,
of course, that your Usenet browser has a kill-filter."
9- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win" an
argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep this
up? What results are you expecting?"
10- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already misread what I
had previously written. What makes you think that you're correctly
understanding what I'm writting now. You've got a history of reading into
things what you wanted people to have said instead of what they really
said. I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you look
foolish."
Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all of them
are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many diverse people
who share a common perception where do you think the problem lies? With
Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an advanced
degree to figure out."
11- Dave Fritzinger: "Snit, please shut up!
Thank you."
12- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and loser
you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i stop
responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up responding
as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the magnitude of
your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop
responding to you. you almost always start responding back in a semi normal
way, but inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time. i can only ask
that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child for having to
put up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a
loser as well, just pass those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not,
double condolences to her). "
13- Edwin: "The worst troll this NG has ever seen is playing the part of the
victim... you can almost hear the violins playing in the background as he
whines... hilarious..."
14- Elijah Baley: "If there's ever been a better example of a sociopath than
this Snit character I haven't seen one."
15- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in my
post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
childishly typical of you, Snit. "
16- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to CSMA
I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides the
typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like being in
a room of really young children trying there best to best the other person.
The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like
this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a great
percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more about
"look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all this picking at
each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always been al little
adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the point that this
place is no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making this
place your own personal circus."
17- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit (AKA
Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy with
his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any cost. He
will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into submission with his
endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger you and
feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!"
18- Greycloud: "I'm beginning to see what you people mean. Are we sure he's
a school teacher?? After all, school has started, so where does he get the
time to blow? "
19- Henry Flam: "Snit, your just a troll. It's irrelevant that you advocate
the Mac. Many folks in this group would be happy if you just disappeared.
But I guess it will never happen. Sigh... "
20- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
21- Jamie Hart (cola): "I was very deliberate in my choice of words, so far
in our exchange, you have claimed to say something you didn't, accused me
of deliberately removing context and accused me of calling you names.
You don't have a very good record so far, and I don't have the time to put
up with your posting style, so this is the last you will hear from me."
22- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on usenet
that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh your screen
endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either you're a
super troll, or you're a super mess."
23- Jeff B. : "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."
24- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve a
greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and those
kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this."
25- Jim Lee Jr.: "Troll."
26- Jim Polaski: "Thanks for starting a three-ring circus act where it
wasn't indicated."
27- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall - in a
few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at passersby
'sucky sucky, $2...'"
28- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
bitching about?"
29- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
30- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings since
I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I just
consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name."
31- John Slade: "Snit is full of shit and knows little about computers.
However I don't think anyone should leave based on how stupid they are.
Everyone has a right to say whatever they want. If Snit wants to display
his ignorance and lack of knowledge, he should have that right."
32- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks.You
make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a
liar and a hypocrite and you always have been."
33- Lars Träger: "Yes, you are stupid."
34- Lefty Bigfoot: "I am once again amazed at how quickly the mindless
parrots inside the RDF will change direction. You are a caricature of the
typical Apple zealot."
35- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been an
annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of trying
to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk about
Linux and you acting every bit the troll."
36- Linønut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
37- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous, I
would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-) "
38- Mark Kent (cola): "Snit is an uber-troll of the worst order... Snit's
as likely to admit error as E.Funkenbusch. If he really teaches (which I
strongly doubt), it must be awful to be taught by someone who cannot accept
when they're wrong, this being one of the fundamental methods for
learning..."
39- Mayor of R'lyeh: "Here's a hint. Whenever Snit is involved double check
everything. He's a major jackass and loves to do things like this."
40- Mike: "The evidence is overwhelming, and self-explanatory. You're not
smart enough to get someone *already there* to press the floppy eject
button - assuming, of course, that this Carefully Contrived Scenario
actually happened. Which we can only assume that it did not. All we
have is your word - hardly compelling."
41- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can only
say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to inhabit
CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged you actually
behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek professional help."
42- mmoore321: "Typical Snit response. Since you could not address that my
comment was about your message and not your sig you decided to do some
pedantic reply. This is a common tact you employ. Don't address the intent
of the message, but try to be "clever". It is a shame it is so
transparent."
43- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two about
social behavior."
44- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them are trolls,
if anyone here has issues it's not me."
45- Nashton: "This issue was beaten to death. I cannot imagine why Snit is
bringing it up and why anybody would bother to engage in conversation with
him on this topic."
46- Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that snit is a
total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am now. Why
bother responding to his stupidities anyway?"
47- news/Andy: "Snit you obviously need to be more precise when you argue
with some people, or are you doing it deliberately?"
48- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher:
Select offending Author, example Snit...
Go to the Filters Menu, Choose "Kill this Author"
Click "OK"
Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice.
Then to see your work...
Choose the Filter Menu again,
Then "Refilter Articles"...
Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!"
49- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher but I
thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten seconds later
and he's gone! Amazing."
50- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has told
me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence."
51- Peter Köhlmann (cola): "His extremely dishonest way of taking posts out
of context is nothing new, wintrolls have tried this since ages (and failed
miserably)
I don't think that there is a single regular poster in cola thinking that
Snit is *not* a troll"
52- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get superficial
snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions."
53- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long standing
war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you single out
persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously berate them
with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their acrimonious responses,
which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad infinitum.
Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing pompous nature
aside, this is what convinces me that your primary purpose for frequenting
this and other groups is to troll."
54-Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash people
that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous situation. And
you do it without the slightest idea of what is going on."
55- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a troll. I
am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a troll, he is ...
somewhat clumsy."
56- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote
Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell of a
tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of looking
ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's your goal,
you're on the right track, and more power to you."
57- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category. Starting
crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to generate a flame
war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and how it can help you and
your supposed users why aren't you requesting help from a more
technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group?
As the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts
seem to confirm that saying IMHO."
58- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY- of
csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news group
before.
He has the ability to turn just about any person against him in just a few
posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny part with Michael is
that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a troll - damn what
-EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are wrong.
Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour."
59- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're probably
dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to remove smut from
your harddrive."
60- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing anger, i
guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he thinks he's
making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's pretty smart.
indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and the iq tests and
he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well adjusted."
61- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll (or worse) by the vast majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."
62- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant dung,
and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus", but then
the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like elephant
dung."
63- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost all
self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses' when
referring to others.
Oh, how could the morally superior snit have fallen so low.. Please take a
moment out of your busy schedule to feel embarassed for him. Or perhaps we
should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the appropriate
plastic bags)."
64- Stuart Krivis: "Dude, the way you act sometimes makes me think you
_like_ to be fucked with and encourage others to do so."
65- TheLetterK: "I am not confused by your claim (I understand it, and the
fallacious argument that spawned it), but I am indeed frustrated by your
refusal to admit mistake. It's really quite simple--you simply have to
indicate that you were wrong. No shame would come from it, and the issue
would be totally forgotten. However, your instance on proving your own
inaccuracy brings the issue to the forefront and continues to degrade the
tattered remains of whatever credibility you had going into the argument
(which is not much)."
66- Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see, you
never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just the
other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in this NG
anyway) calling somebody else a liar."
67- Tim Smith: "Another troll attempt using a random redirector."
68- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
69- Tommy: "LIAR!!!"
70- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'.
Just what would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must
be some kind of severe mental illness."
71- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are nothing
more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to define the
rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend the rules when
inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this reason I doubt anyone
would be foolish enough to play your game."
72- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
apologies for this, PLONK!
Feel proud about that. You're the first person to be plonked from my new
computer! :-) "
73- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
74- zara: "ya know Snit, I am one of your fans. I also admit to being a
Troll- why don't you admit to being a Troll also?? That hoilier than thou
bullshit, dosen't flush. "
75- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to draw more
people into the debate I'm currently having with Steve/Elizabot/etc' tactic
is fairly trollish."
Snit
on 1/14/06 11:47 AM:
> Snit: "I do not believe in consensus reality. I believe in facts."
Gee, if I find this annoying does Steve Carroll go to jail? LOL!
Oh, that's right, you are back to denying your sock puppetry!
"> I am
...a hypocrite and delusional liar? Yes, I know." - Steve Carroll
"Snit... why do I need to hide behind a sock puppet to post that stuff? -
Steve Carroll
--
"I am not a number, I am a free year!" - '06
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "CSMA_Moderator" <x...@yyy.zzz> stated in post 42sva0F...@individual.net
> on 1/14/06 11:47 AM:
>
> > Snit: "I do not believe in consensus reality. I believe in facts."
>
> Gee, if I find this annoying does Steve Carroll go to jail? LOL!
IF you find this annoying? IF??? ROTFLMAO! This obviously annoys the
livin' shit outta you;) I really REALLY wish I could take credit for
it... but I can't, (other than what is included of mine in the post).
--
"The question is not about my behavior: the question is about your
admission about not being able to carry on a reasoned conversation."
Snit
noone-5B40A2....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 1/14/06 5:10 PM:
> In article <BFEED41B.4184F%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "CSMA_Moderator" <x...@yyy.zzz> stated in post 42sva0F...@individual.net
>> on 1/14/06 11:47 AM:
>>
>>> Snit: "I do not believe in consensus reality. I believe in facts."
>>
>> Gee, if I find this annoying does Steve Carroll go to jail? LOL!
>
> IF you find this annoying? IF??? ROTFLMAO! This obviously annoys the
> livin' shit outta you;) I really REALLY wish I could take credit for
> it... but I can't, (other than what is included of mine in the post).
You and your NAMBLA-like group insist all sorts of things about me. So I
look forward to your support that your sock puppet annoys me. LOL!
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> noone-5B40A2....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 1/14/06 5:10 PM:
>
> > In article <BFEED41B.4184F%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> > Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >> "CSMA_Moderator" <x...@yyy.zzz> stated in post
> >> 42sva0F...@individual.net
> >> on 1/14/06 11:47 AM:
> >>
> >>> Snit: "I do not believe in consensus reality. I believe in facts."
> >>
> >> Gee, if I find this annoying does Steve Carroll go to jail? LOL!
> >
> > IF you find this annoying? IF??? ROTFLMAO! This obviously annoys the
> > livin' shit outta you;) I really REALLY wish I could take credit for
> > it... but I can't, (other than what is included of mine in the post).
>
> You and your NAMBLA-like group insist all sorts of things about me. So I
> look forward to your support that your sock puppet annoys me. LOL!
What sock puppet? And why are you still babbling on about NAMBLA and
incest? Wasn't incest by itself a sick obsession for you? Now you have
to drag little boys into it? Leave your cousin alone, Snit.
Snit
> In article <BFEEE25C.41876%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
>> noone-5B40A2....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 1/14/06 5:10 PM:
>>
>>> In article <BFEED41B.4184F%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "CSMA_Moderator" <x...@yyy.zzz> stated in post
>>>> 42sva0F...@individual.net
>>>> on 1/14/06 11:47 AM:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit: "I do not believe in consensus reality. I believe in facts."
>>>>
>>>> Gee, if I find this annoying does Steve Carroll go to jail? LOL!
>>>
>>> IF you find this annoying? IF??? ROTFLMAO! This obviously annoys the
>>> livin' shit outta you;) I really REALLY wish I could take credit for
>>> it... but I can't, (other than what is included of mine in the post).
>>
>> You and your NAMBLA-like group insist all sorts of things about me. So I
>> look forward to your support that your sock puppet annoys me. LOL!
>
> What sock puppet?
LOL! Too damned funny. OK, Steve, your good buddy (*cough* *cough*) CDMA
Mod who is not, of course, your sock puppet! LOL! Of course not. How
could he be, right?
> And why are you still babbling on about NAMBLA and
> incest? Wasn't incest by itself a sick obsession for you? Now you have
> to drag little boys into it? Leave your cousin alone, Snit.
Poor little Steve, he now is trying to pretend that he and his sick PISS
group are not the perverts.
Remember, Steve, it is me telling *you* and your idiotic group of perverts
that sex and incest are not at all synonymous. You are part of the group
that insists the two concepts *are* synonymous, not me. LOL! At least you
have the sense to try to run from speaking too much about your perversions!
__________________________________________
| |
| PISS: Pedophiliac & Incest Sicko Support |
| Founders: Steve Carroll and Elizabeth |
| Members: Tim Adams and Wally |
| |
| Let this sick group know pedophilia & |
| incest are *not* synonymous with sex! |
|__________________________________________|
Elizabeth
> "CSMA_Moderator" <x...@yyy.zzz> stated in post 42sva0F...@individual.net
> on 1/14/06 11:47 AM:
>
>
>>Snit: "I do not believe in consensus reality. I believe in facts."
>
>
> Gee, if I find this annoying does Steve Carroll go to jail? LOL!
>
> Oh, that's right, you are back to denying your sock puppetry!
>
>
> "> I am
> ...a hypocrite and delusional liar? Yes, I know." - Steve Carroll
>
> "Snit... why do I need to hide behind a sock puppet to post that stuff? -
> Steve Carroll
>
>
>
Snit
11sk5jq...@corp.supernews.com on 1/15/06 2:31 AM:
You do. Deeply. And you simply cannot hide it. So do your PISS buddies.
__________________________________________
| |
| PISS: Pedophiliac & Incest Sicko Support |
| Founders: Steve Carroll and Elizabeth |
| Members: Tim Adams and Wally |
| |
| Let this sick group know pedophilia & |
| incest are *not* synonymous with sex! |
|__________________________________________|
--
Snit
> In article <BFEEE25C.41876%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
>> noone-5B40A2....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 1/14/06 5:10 PM:
>>
>>> In article <BFEED41B.4184F%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "CSMA_Moderator" <x...@yyy.zzz> stated in post
>>>> 42sva0F...@individual.net
>>>> on 1/14/06 11:47 AM:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit: "I do not believe in consensus reality. I believe in facts."
>>>>
>>>> Gee, if I find this annoying does Steve Carroll go to jail? LOL!
>>>
>>> IF you find this annoying? IF??? ROTFLMAO! This obviously annoys the
>>> livin' shit outta you;) I really REALLY wish I could take credit for
>>> it... but I can't, (other than what is included of mine in the post).
>>
>> You and your NAMBLA-like group insist all sorts of things about me. So I
>> look forward to your support that your sock puppet annoys me. LOL!
>
> What sock puppet?
LOL! Too damned funny. OK, Steve, your good buddy (*cough* *cough*) CSMA
Mod who is not, of course, your sock puppet! LOL! Of course not. How
could he be, right?
> And why are you still babbling on about NAMBLA and
> incest? Wasn't incest by itself a sick obsession for you? Now you have
> to drag little boys into it? Leave your cousin alone, Snit.
Poor little Steve, he now is trying to pretend that he and his sick PISS
group are not the perverts.
Remember, Steve, it is me telling *you* and your idiotic group of perverts
that sex and incest are not at all synonymous. You are part of the group
that insists the two concepts *are* synonymous, not me. LOL! At least you
have the sense to try to run from speaking too much about your perversions!
____________________________________________
|\____________________________________________/|
| | | |
| | PISS: Pedophiliac & Incest Sicko Support | |
| | Founders: Steve Carroll and Elizabeth | |
| | Members: Tim Adams and Wally | |
| | | |
| | Let this sick group know pedophilia & | |
| | incest are *not* synonymous with sex! | |
| |__________________________________________| |
|/____________________________________________\|