Sorry Snit... your plan backfired
Steve Carroll
about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
--
"I would not be a good liar, being that I have little if any practice." - Snit
Steve Mackay
> Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
> about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
> 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
> better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
> bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
>
He's getting desperate now :)
macsuc...@yahoo.com
Steve Carroll wrote:
> Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
> about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
> 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
> better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
> bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
>
Why not post a transcript of this e-mail? Being that you are not always
the most honest person in the world this is difficult to believe
without some sort of documentation.
Maybe you can even upload it as a PDF.
Snit
noone-02431C....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 11/15/05 7:46 PM:
> Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
> about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
> 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
> better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
> bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
What e-mail? Oh, you are just full of it again.
In any case I would love to see this alleged e-mail posted to CSMA with all
the headers even. LOL... oh, hurry up and write it, Steve... you now are
being asked to support your BS... again.
And you never, ever will.
Keep in mind that *all* of this is because you were never able to *really*
refute my argument against Bush and you have been piling lie upon lie for
well over a year in an effort to obfuscate that fact.
What a pathetic troll you are.
--
I wrote:
It has become so easy to point out Steve's lies...
Tim Adams replied:
if you read what snit posts, you'll see all the proof you need.
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
Elizabot v2.0.2
> Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
> about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
> 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
> better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
> bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
>
And how did he get her email address? Inquiring minds want to know. Do
you think he got it from a police report? Snit has totally screwed himself.
Elizabot v2.0.2
I want to see it! If it's an "anonymous email", then I don't see the
problem with it being posted to this forum. I'd like to see the IP
address on the headers too.
Steve Carroll
"Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote:
Well, there is one way he could have gotten it... but divulging that
info would get what I believe to be an innocent party in trouble. Police
report? What are you insinuating:)
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> noone-02431C....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 11/15/05 7:46 PM:
>
> > Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
> > about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
> > 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
> > better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
> > bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
>
> What e-mail?
The one that didn't do what you hoped.
Steve Carroll
macsuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Do you think I'm as stupid as you've just shown yourself to be? I just
stated I can't prove it was him... realistically, what proof would you
accept from me after seeing me state that? I'm not trying to convince
anyone of anything... least of all some Snit sock puppet or shill. I'm
just letting Snit know his plan backfired. I now expect him to forge an
email from me to him... he's not very original.
Snit
> In article <BF9FED92.3A14F%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
>> noone-02431C....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 11/15/05 7:46 PM:
>>
>>> Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
>>> about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
>>> 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
>>> better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
>>> bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
>>
>> What e-mail?
>
> The one that didn't do what you hoped.
You have made a serious accusation. Do you or do you not have *any*
support. Let me be very, very clear: your accusation is a lie... a bald
faced lie. You tell them often, but this one is big even for you.
Clearly this whole CSMA silliness has gone too far... you are now spewing
even bigger lies than is your norm. Let me repeat my oft stated request for
a halting of the silliness and the back and forth attacks.
At the very least admit that you are lying about your accusation about me.
For once, Steve, do the right thing.
--
Of course I posted as fretwizz - Steve Carroll
Steve Mackay
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> noone-46961D....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 11/15/05 8:07 PM:
>
>> In article <BF9FED92.3A14F%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
>>> noone-02431C....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 11/15/05 7:46 PM:
>>>
>>>> Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
>>>> about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
>>>> 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
>>>> better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
>>>> bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
>>> What e-mail?
>> The one that didn't do what you hoped.
>
> You have made a serious accusation. Do you or do you not have *any*
> support. Let me be very, very clear: your accusation is a lie... a bald
> faced lie. You tell them often, but this one is big even for you.
>
> Clearly this whole CSMA silliness has gone too far... you are now spewing
> even bigger lies than is your norm. Let me repeat my oft stated request for
> a halting of the silliness and the back and forth attacks.
>
> At the very least admit that you are lying about your accusation about me.
> For once, Steve, do the right thing.
>
>
Snit, what's the difference? If he does have concrete evidence, You'll
spend months throwing up strawmen, conspiracy theories, ya know, your
normal bullshit. So why bother?
Steve Carroll
Steve Mackay <steve_...@hotmil.com> wrote:
Exactly. Snit needs to work on that comprehension thing... I clearly
stated that I couldn't prove it. The problem here is, even attempting to
prove it might just get an innocent person in trouble.
Snit
PM:
> Exactly. Snit needs to work on that comprehension thing... I clearly
> stated that I couldn't prove it. The problem here is, even attempting to
> prove it might just get an innocent person in trouble.
Someone once told me:
If you were never worried... why did you go to the police? A person
that
was TRULY innocent (and KNEW it) would never have bothered. Guess
that
didn't occur to you:)
And yet now you are afraid an innocent person would get in trouble.
You need to look at your definitions of guilty and innocent again....
As I have told you, Steve, your lies have piled so high that your every
word leads to them collapsing on you.
Care to *really* bury the hatchet and stop your BS?
--
they aren't the only ones that can play their silly word games and
what-not
- Steve Carroll
Snit
PM:
> In article <1132109679.2...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> macsuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
>>> about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
>>> 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
>>> better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
>>> bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
>>>
>> Steve,
>>
>> Why not post a transcript of this e-mail? Being that you are not always
>> the most honest person in the world this is difficult to believe
>> without some sort of documentation.
>
>
> Do you think I'm as stupid as you've just shown yourself to be?
You are as stupid as you *want* others to be, Steve... and maybe even
think they are.
> I just stated I can't prove it was him... realistically, what proof
> would you accept from me after seeing me state that?
Yet, look what you say in just a couple of sentences:
> I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything... least of all some Snit sock
> puppet or shill. I'm just letting Snit know his plan backfired.
What plan? You admit you have no proof of the false accusation you are
making against me and then in the very same post you talk about some
fictitious "plan" I had as though you have proof of this "plan".
What plan? What e-mail? You are, of course, lying.
> I now expect him to forge an email from me to him... he's not very original.
And now you are making yet new accusations. Accusations you will
*never* support... being that you are lying.
--
I'm not denying I'm an asshole. What of it? - Steve Carroll
Snit
1132109679.2...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com on 11/15/05 7:54
PM:
Heck, if Steve wants he can e-mail the PDF to me and I will post it on
my site.
For the record: Steve is full of it. I sent no e-mail to him nor to
his "wife". For that matter I do not even know his or his unmarried
"wife's" e-mail.
Steve is spewing more garbage to try to dig his way out of his
accusations against Yobo and I. And, as is his norm, he is piling one
lie on top of another in order to obfuscate the first. It has been
like this ever since he realized he could not speak reasonably against
my argument against Bush. Pathetic!
--
I listen and scratch my head... listen some more... pound it, (my head)
on
the table for a awhile -- Steve Carroll
Snit
PM:
> Snit needs to work on that comprehension thing... I clearly stated that I
> couldn't prove it.
"You stated that your evidence offered no proof and that created 100%
doubt ... And THAT, my friend... is what a refutation feels like"
- Steve Carroll
Good to see you admit that your accusation has been fully refuted.
Will you go the one step further and admit that you lied ... most
likely to try to impress Elizabot. Do you think it worked?
Snit
11nl86g...@corp.supernews.com on 11/15/05 8:00 PM:
Steve is still... um... "finding" it. He will post it once he and
Mackay have finished with it and not a moment before that!
You used to fantasize about me calling you. Now Steve is fantasizing
about me e-mailing his unmarried "wife". Heck, he once asked me to go
on a road trip with his wife. Did you tell him he has to get rid of
her before he can have you? Whatever it takes I hope you two work out
your differences so I can be left out of your lover's quarrels!
--
"Of course Elizabot and myself are involved" - Steve Carroll
Elizabot v2.0.2
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> noone-8FA9A7....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 11/15/05 9:31
> PM:
>
>
>>Snit needs to work on that comprehension thing... I clearly stated that I
>>couldn't prove it.
>
>
> "You stated that your evidence offered no proof and that created 100%
> doubt ... And THAT, my friend... is what a refutation feels like"
> - Steve Carroll
>
> Good to see you admit that your accusation has been fully refuted.
> Will you go the one step further and admit that you lied ... most
> likely to try to impress Elizabot. Do you think it worked?
Actually, I've been enjoying watching you beg for Steve's attention.
Most entertaining.
Snit
How is Steve's bogus accusation an example of my doing *anything* to
myself?
Seems Steve's plan has worked... he pleased you with his accusation.
Good... now would the two of you leave me out of your lover's quarrels?
--
"the concept known as 'evidence' DIRECTLY EQUATES TO PROOF" - Steve
Carroll
Snit
Aha... good to see you have such insight into Steve's wee little brain.
I think you may be right - he made up this accusation not just to
please you (which you claim you are enjoying it) but also to get my
attention.
Thanks for providing the evidence of what a sick little man he is.
Elizabot v2.0.2
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Sorry Snit... your plan backfired
Date: 15 Nov 2005 21:38:54 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <1132119533....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <noone-02431C....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>
<11nl800...@corp.supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.116.66.67
Mime-Version: 1.0
Gee, how many times are you going to post this, Snit? haven't you
figured out how to use Google yet? LMAO!
Elizabot v2.0.2
From: Snit <brockmc...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Sorry Snit... your plan backfired
Date: 15 Nov 2005 21:42:41 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <1132119761.9...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
References: <noone-02431C....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>
<11nl800...@corp.supernews.com>
<noone-182BB2....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>
<1132118897....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<11nlhe3...@corp.supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.116.66.67
Snit
> Another nymshift. You're a stupid troll.
Oh no... I shifted my name from "Snit" to "Snit".
<SNIP />
>>> Actually, I've been enjoying watching you beg for Steve's attention.
>>> Most entertaining.
>>
>>
>> Aha... good to see you have such insight into Steve's wee little brain.
>> I think you may be right - he made up this accusation not just to
>> please you (which you claim you are enjoying it) but also to get my
>> attention.
>>
>> Thanks for providing the evidence of what a sick little man he is.
And, of course, you used that little ploy to try to avoid giving a real
response to the fact that you have shown - again - how sick you and
Steve are. Quick! Make up something good...
--
For more info on the following, including quotes and Message IDs where
Elizabot does what I state, see: <http://snipurl.com/bots_obsession>
* Elizabot posted information about my child that, as far as is known,
can only be found in the print edition of my local paper. When asked
about it she refuses to say where she got the info and begs to know
details she missed.
* Elizabot posted information about me obtained from the college
website
where I work, including what type of classes I teach and the days I
work.
* Elizabot followed me around begging me to tell her how "incest" made
me feel - after pretending that I wanted to talk to her about
incest and she did not want to.
* When Elizabot found out my wife and I were expecting a child she
repeatedly whined that I would not discuss family planning
options with *her*!
* Elizabot posts more posts that deal with me that she does *anyone*
else by a long shot (likely 10x as many about or to me).
She is clearly obsessed with me.
* Elizabot repeatedly insinuated that I have called her on the phone
When I brought it up, she whined, "I have not brought up the phone
call issue in three months and only briefly at the time."
* Elizabot publicly accused me of being a rapist (with her as one of my
"victims")
* Elizabot fantasized I returned any romantic interest in her, "Reality
shows I rejected you in mid-December, 2003."
* Elizabot threatened to call the police and make false allegations if
I
cross some imaginary line (what has she not accused me of? Rape and
perversion do not cross her line!)
* Elizabot tracked me down to my place of employment and made thinly
veiled threats to send her, um, "views" there.
* Elizabot, along with Steve Carroll, have tried to dishonestly and
repulsively tie my completely unrelated health concerns with my
pointing
out their trolling, lying, and outrageous behavior.
* Elizabot has taken at least one image from my site (owned by someone
else) and edited it (including adding feminine hygiene products to
the
image) and reposted links to it in a public forum (CSMA).
Snit
>> How is Steve's bogus accusation an example of my doing *anything* to
>> myself?
>>
>> Seems Steve's plan has worked... he pleased you with his accusation.
>> Good... now would the two of you leave me out of your lover's quarrels?
>
> Gee, how many times are you going to post this, Snit?
I will make a deal with you - I will stop posting to you completely if
you *and* Steve leave me out of your lover's quarrels.
You will not, of course, take that deal... you enjoy Steve begging to
get your approval too much to do so.
--
"Toasty is still missing. If you see him, please send him home... it's
bath night at the chicken farm." - Steve Carroll
macsuc...@yahoo.com
Steve Carroll wrote:
> In article <1132109679.2...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> macsuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
> > > about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
> > > 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
> > > better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
> > > bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
> > >
> > Steve,
> >
> > Why not post a transcript of this e-mail? Being that you are not always
> > the most honest person in the world this is difficult to believe
> > without some sort of documentation.
>
>
> Do you think I'm as stupid as you've just shown yourself to be?
I would not go so far as to call you stupid -- deficient in common
sense and logical reasoning capabilities, perhaps. Glue tends to do
that to a person.
> I just stated I can't prove it was him... realistically, what proof would you
> accept from me after seeing me state that?
I don't expect you to provide absolute proof... But the full e-mail +
headers would be a good start. If the e-mail was really so funny, why
not share it with the rest of the group? We could all have a good laugh
at Snit's expense, presuming that this isn't just another of your
delusions.
> I'm not trying to convince
> anyone of anything... least of all some Snit sock puppet or shill.
Why, what's wrong with being a sock puppet all of a sudden?
> I'm just letting Snit know his plan backfired. I now expect him to forge an
> email from me to him... he's not very original.
Seems to me that your plan backfired, since no one seems to believe
you. It's like you just keep trying to lie but everyone is just too
smart for you. Are you sure you even know how to be honest?
Steve Carroll
macsuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> > In article <1132109679.2...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > macsuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > > Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > > Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
> > > > about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
> > > > 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
> > > > better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
> > > > bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
> > > >
> > > Steve,
> > >
> > > Why not post a transcript of this e-mail? Being that you are not always
> > > the most honest person in the world this is difficult to believe
> > > without some sort of documentation.
> >
> >
> > Do you think I'm as stupid as you've just shown yourself to be?
>
> I would not go so far as to call you stupid -- deficient in common
> sense and logical reasoning capabilities, perhaps. Glue tends to do
> that to a person.
I've just told you there's no point in me offering up proof of something
I've already stated I couldn't prove and you're telling me that *I'm*
deficient in common sense and logical reasoning? Snit's sock puppets are
getting awfully stupid these days.
> > I just stated I can't prove it was him... realistically, what proof would
> > you
> > accept from me after seeing me state that?
>
> I don't expect you to provide absolute proof...
Where did you get the idea that I'm concerned with your expectations?
Snit's sock puppets are getting awfully narcissistic these days.
> But the full e-mail +
> headers would be a good start. If the e-mail was really so funny, why
> not share it with the rest of the group?
Why do you assume the email would be funny to the general public?
Oppps ;)
> We could all have a good laugh
> at Snit's expense, presuming that this isn't just another of your
> delusions.
>
> > I'm not trying to convince
> > anyone of anything... least of all some Snit sock puppet or shill.
>
> Why, what's wrong with being a sock puppet all of a sudden?
>
> > I'm just letting Snit know his plan backfired. I now expect him to forge
> > an
> > email from me to him... he's not very original.
>
> Seems to me that your plan backfired,
"Seems" to you? You're the guy that believes your expectations are a
concern to me... the guy who just finished proving that he is the one
who is "deficient in common sense and logical reasoning"... the guy who
leaped to the assumption that the email would be found funny by others.
Obviously, how things "seem" to you have no connection with reality.
> since no one seems to believe you.
"No one"? "seems"? Nows let's see... who else uses such vague language
in situations like this?
> It's like you just keep trying to lie but everyone is just too
> smart for you.
"everyone"? Interesting... (you jumping to absolutes). I know that
someone around here does this... I just can't 'seem' to remember who it
is;)
> Are you sure you even know how to be honest?
Don't you know?
Steve Carroll
"Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote:
Here Snit is, caught nymshifting once again... as he claims that *I*
made this up to get attention.
The gluehead doth protest too much, methinks.
Steve Carroll
"Snit" <brockmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> noone-8FA9A7....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 11/15/05 9:31
> PM:
>
> > Exactly. Snit needs to work on that comprehension thing... I clearly
> > stated that I couldn't prove it. The problem here is, even attempting to
> > prove it might just get an innocent person in trouble.
>
> Someone once told me:
>
> If you were never worried... why did you go to the police? A person
> that
> was TRULY innocent (and KNEW it) would never have bothered. Guess
> that
> didn't occur to you:)
>
> And yet now you are afraid an innocent person would get in trouble.
Care to explain what one situation has to do with the other? Scratch
that... you've flung enough delusions around already.
> You need to look at your definitions of guilty and innocent again....
>
> As I have told you, Steve, your lies have piled so high that your every
> word leads to them collapsing on you.
>
> Care to *really* bury the hatchet and stop your BS?
What? Do your delusions have you believing you've delivered me a near
fatal blow with this juvenile prank? The other one, the address crap was
a bit much, but not unexpected. Guess what? Neither of them had any
effect on my life. Disappointed?
Elizabot v2.0.2
> In article <11nli1b...@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Another nymshift. You're a stupid troll.
>>
>>From: Snit <brockmc...@gmail.com>
>>Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
>>Subject: Re: Sorry Snit... your plan backfired
>>Date: 15 Nov 2005 21:42:41 -0800
>>Organization: http://groups.google.com
>>Lines: 36
>>Message-ID: <1132119761.9...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
>>References: <noone-02431C....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>
>><11nl800...@corp.supernews.com>
>><noone-182BB2....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>
>><1132118897....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
>><11nlhe3...@corp.supernews.com>
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.116.66.67
>>
>>Snit wrote:
<snip>
> Here Snit is, caught nymshifting once again... as he claims that *I*
> made this up to get attention.
>
> The gluehead doth protest too much, methinks.
Methinks he's trolling as hard as he can now while he still has his account.
Snit
>
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>> In article <1132109679.2...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>> macsuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> Sending the e-mail to my significant other with all that bullcrap in it
>>>> about Elizabot only made her laugh. I know you're pissed that your
>>>> 'sweet tomato' dropped a dime on you, but seriously, can't you do any
>>>> better than this? No, I can't prove it was you but who else would
>>>> bother? Who else would show such a limited imagination;)
>>>>
>>> Steve,
>>>
>>> Why not post a transcript of this e-mail? Being that you are not always
>>> the most honest person in the world this is difficult to believe
>>> without some sort of documentation.
>>
>>
>> Do you think I'm as stupid as you've just shown yourself to be?
>
> I would not go so far as to call you stupid -- deficient in common
> sense and logical reasoning capabilities, perhaps. Glue tends to do
> that to a person.
And, of course, Steve is obsessed with glue. That is easy to show in the
Google record... or in Steve's case we could call it the Glugle record. :)
>
>> I just stated I can't prove it was him... realistically, what proof would you
>> accept from me after seeing me state that?
>
> I don't expect you to provide absolute proof... But the full e-mail +
> headers would be a good start. If the e-mail was really so funny, why
> not share it with the rest of the group? We could all have a good laugh
> at Snit's expense, presuming that this isn't just another of your
> delusions.
And if Steve has *no* proof or even mild evidence of his accusation - which
he does not... how can he claim some plan of *mine* backfired? What plan?
He has made a completely unsupported accusation and then is claiming it is
some plan of *mine*.
Well, hmmmm... I have been responding to Steve. Part of that "plan" is I
*know* Steve will spew a bunch of BS only his cretin crew buddies will
accept. And that "plan" has worked perfectly... but it is so predictable
that it hardly counts.
Steve will *never* support this accusation of his. Never. It is a lie.
There likely was no e-mail at all, but if there was it had nothing to do
with me. My "involvement" in this is nothing but a complete and total
fabrication created by Steve and spewed into a public forum by him.
And, of course, Steve has repeatedly claimed that if one does not have proof
of one's argument then one has been fully refuted. It is a stupid claim, of
course, but one that shall be biting Steve on the ass in this silly game of
his. I have repeatedly told Steve he does not understand the concept of "a
lack of proof AND a disproof"... and now Steve will have to do a complete
flip flop and argue why his 100% lack of proof is not a complete disproof of
his claim. It is hilarious.
Of course, some of the fun will be taken away by Steve's cowardly snip and
run trolling. It is all he really has left... his pile of lies is just too
big these days.
>> I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything... least of all some Snit sock
>> puppet or shill.
>
> Why, what's wrong with being a sock puppet all of a sudden?
Hey, you quoted Steve. He *must* be your sock puppet... just ask he, Wally,
and Elizabot. LOL... do they not realize how transparent their lies are
these days?
Again - the perfect storm hit Elizabot... and she and her puppies have
imploded over it. I love it.
>
>> I'm just letting Snit know his plan backfired. I now expect him to forge an
>> email from me to him... he's not very original.
>
> Seems to me that your plan backfired, since no one seems to believe
> you. It's like you just keep trying to lie but everyone is just too
> smart for you.
Hey - Elizabot's whole gang of idiots is sure to believe him. They always
support each other... no matter how big their lie is. That is just what they
do.
> Are you sure you even know how to be honest?
"I'm not sure I even know how to be honest" - Steve Carroll
LOL!
--
"you really outsmarted me this time" -- Steve Carroll