Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Tired of the Snit Circus?

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Sandman

unread,
May 17, 2004, 2:13:10 AM5/17/04
to
I am, so I killfiled him. I strongly urge the Steves and Elizabot to do the
same. This is an efficient way to expunge -everything- related to Snit from the
group, using MT-Newswatcher:

Create two filters (note the 'matches the regular expression' part):

Kill if "Message-ID" matches the regular expression "<[^
]*@nospam.cableone.net>"

Kill if "references" matches the regular expression "<[^
]*@nospam.cableone.net>"

This will killfile every post Snit makes and also all replies to his posts, and
this is how I set it up - this killed 146 messages from the group right away.

You're welcome.

--
Sandman[.net]

Sandman

unread,
May 17, 2004, 2:14:41 AM5/17/04
to
In article <mr-93C386.08...@individual.net>, Sandman <m...@sandman.net>
wrote:

Unfortunately, this message was wrapped in a negative way. The regular
expression should look like this:

<[^ ]*@nospam.cableone.net>

--
Sandman[.net]

Nashton

unread,
May 17, 2004, 6:38:30 AM5/17/04
to
Sandman wrote:

I'm going to wait and see, since it was the weekend and all. I expect
him to fully address the question we asked him and an apology PRN.
Subsequent to this, I will expect an apology from Steve and Steeve and
Ebot.
I am also taking this opportunity to apologies for anything I might have
said that was out of line and hurtful as this is not my MO. I just have
an innate dislike for mob mentalities and I perceived this hole snafu to
be mob mentality-ridden and driven, but I have been wrong before;)

Nicolas

Sandman

unread,
May 17, 2004, 7:10:32 AM5/17/04
to
In article <GC0qc.41177$Np3.1...@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>,
Nashton <na...@smash.cash> wrote:

> >>I am, so I killfiled him. I strongly urge the Steves and Elizabot to do the
> >>same. This is an efficient way to expunge -everything- related to Snit from
> >>the group, using MT-Newswatcher:
> >>
> >>Create two filters (note the 'matches the regular expression' part):
> >>
> >>Kill if "Message-ID" matches the regular expression "<[^
> >>]*@nospam.cableone.net>"
> >>
> >>Kill if "references" matches the regular expression "<[^
> >>]*@nospam.cableone.net>"
> >>
> >>This will killfile every post Snit makes and also all replies to his posts,
> >>and this is how I set it up - this killed 146 messages from the group right
> >>away.
> >>
> >>You're welcome.
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately, this message was wrapped in a negative way. The regular
> > expression should look like this:
> >
> > <[^ ]*@nospam.cableone.net>
>
> I'm going to wait and see, since it was the weekend and all. I expect
> him to fully address the question we asked him and an apology PRN.

What? Why would you think that? He has responded to all these posts but only
continue to troll. I made a lengthy post containing the actual facts about
sigmond and he -still. denies having used that IP, even though poosts from him
to usenet have that exact ip!

The only way he can address this is by admitting they are correct, which he has
shown he won't do. He continue to troll.

--
Sandman[.net]

Steve Carroll

unread,
May 17, 2004, 10:11:24 AM5/17/04
to
In article <GC0qc.41177$Np3.1...@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>,
Nashton <na...@smash.cash> wrote:

Thank you, Nic. I hereby apologize to you for any hurtful or insensitive
thing I may have ever said to you.

Steve

Sandman

unread,
May 17, 2004, 10:33:33 AM5/17/04
to
In article <fretwizz-4077C6...@netnews.comcast.net>,
Steve Carroll <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote:

> > What? Why would you think that? He has responded to all these posts but
> > only continue to troll. I made a lengthy post containing the actual facts
> > about sigmond and he -still. denies having used that IP, even though
> > poosts from him to usenet have that exact ip!
> >
> > The only way he can address this is by admitting they are correct, which
> > he has shown he won't do. He continue to troll.
>

> Like I've suggested for quite awhile now, fact is, Snit may not be sigmond.
> It is quite possible that sigmond was nothing more than one of his
> students... coming to what he perceived as Snit's defense. Isn't it?

No, that's not even plausible.

--
Sandman[.net]

Steve Carroll

unread,
May 17, 2004, 11:08:10 AM5/17/04
to
In article <mr-93C386.08...@individual.net>,
Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:

But doesn't this kill all posters with @nospam.cableone.net?

Steve

Elizabot

unread,
May 17, 2004, 11:10:59 AM5/17/04
to

That and any followups.

Elizabot

unread,
May 17, 2004, 11:11:36 AM5/17/04
to
Sandman wrote:

I will not killfile him, but I will do my best to refrain from playing
Snit's games. I make no promises, but I will try my best. I have stopped
responding to Snit in the past and I can do it again.

I also apologize to the group for the mass disruption I have helped Snit
create. It has been my goal all along to show that he is a troll of the
worst sort, but it has gotten out-of-hand. Sorry.

Steve Carroll

unread,
May 17, 2004, 11:13:53 AM5/17/04
to
In article <mr-0D9F58.16...@individual.net>,
Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:

Why not? Anyway... about your filters, I just asked you if they would
kill all posters with -...@nospam.cableone.net- and then I went to google.
It seems anyone with such info is Snit, under one name or another, so
there is no loss. Good job... at least... until he changes it:)

Steve

Bob S

unread,
May 17, 2004, 11:58:58 AM5/17/04
to
In article <mr-93C386.08...@individual.net>,
Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:

> I am, so I killfiled him. I strongly urge the Steves and Elizabot to do the
> same. This is an efficient way to expunge -everything- related to Snit from
> the
> group, using MT-Newswatcher:


I hvae missed the whole Snit-Sandman/Steve thing. I don't know why it
stayed below my radar. Guess I'll go back and Google the whole thing.

Only Mr. Elam and Pratt currently reside in my killfile folder, and I
wind up reading their comments anayway because other posters quote them.

--
Cheers,

Bob S

Sandman

unread,
May 17, 2004, 12:58:48 PM5/17/04
to
In article <fretwizz-76C741...@netnews.comcast.net>,
Steve Carroll <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote:

Are there more than one in this group?

--
Sandman[.net]

Martik

unread,
May 17, 2004, 4:20:26 PM5/17/04
to
If you want him to go away, just ignore him. Don't respond to any of his
posts. He thrives on feedback and is probably reeling in orgasmic delight
with everyone talking about him.


Sandman

unread,
May 17, 2004, 4:24:13 PM5/17/04
to
In article <e89qc.11417$RM.2252@edtnps89>, "Martik" <martik@_nospam_telus.net>
wrote:

> If you want him to go away, just ignore him. Don't respond to any of his
> posts. He thrives on feedback and is probably reeling in orgasmic delight
> with everyone talking about him.

Hence the killfile. :)

--
Sandman[.net]

MuahMan

unread,
May 17, 2004, 5:07:24 PM5/17/04
to
Snit's not the problem. It the rest of you lunatics.

"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
news:mr-93C386.08...@individual.net...

Alan Baker

unread,
May 18, 2004, 12:13:35 AM5/18/04
to
In article <jQ9qc.166256$f_5.98383@lakeread01>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Snit's not the problem. It the rest of you lunatics.

The best confirmation yet.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

Snit

unread,
May 18, 2004, 12:18:11 AM5/18/04
to
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in
alangbaker-00B86...@news.telus.net on 5/17/04 9:13 PM:

> In article <jQ9qc.166256$f_5.98383@lakeread01>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Snit's not the problem. It the rest of you lunatics.
>
> The best confirmation yet.

Of what?

Edwin

unread,
May 18, 2004, 7:18:58 PM5/18/04
to

"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
news:mr-93C386.08...@individual.net...
> I am, so I killfiled him. I strongly urge the Steves and Elizabot to do
the
> same. This is an efficient way to expunge -everything- related to Snit
from the
> group, using MT-Newswatcher:

You finally met your match. You finally met a poster who's even loopier
that you are, who could out-clatter you, who could keep going until even you
are exhausted. Somebody ought to tell the Ripley's Believe-It-Or-Not
folks.


> Create two filters (note the 'matches the regular expression' part):
>
> Kill if "Message-ID" matches the regular expression "<[^
> ]*@nospam.cableone.net>"
>
> Kill if "references" matches the regular expression "<[^
> ]*@nospam.cableone.net>"
>
> This will killfile every post Snit makes and also all replies to his
posts, and
> this is how I set it up - this killed 146 messages from the group right
away.
>
> You're welcome.

Thanks. Now tell us how to filter out the Sandman Carnival...

--
Edwin


Sandman

unread,
May 19, 2004, 8:11:43 AM5/19/04
to
In article <CRwqc.2481$tW5...@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

> > I am, so I killfiled him. I strongly urge the Steves and Elizabot to do
> > the same. This is an efficient way to expunge -everything- related to Snit
> > from the group, using MT-Newswatcher:
>
> You finally met your match.

Ok.

--
Sandman[.net]

Steve Mackay

unread,
May 17, 2004, 8:56:54 AM5/17/04
to
On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:38:30 +0000, Nashton wrote:

> Sandman wrote:
>
>> In article <mr-93C386.08...@individual.net>, Sandman <m...@sandman.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am, so I killfiled him. I strongly urge the Steves and Elizabot to do the
>>>same. This is an efficient way to expunge -everything- related to Snit from
>>>the group, using MT-Newswatcher:
>>>
>>>Create two filters (note the 'matches the regular expression' part):
>>>
>>>Kill if "Message-ID" matches the regular expression "<[^
>>>]*@nospam.cableone.net>"
>>>
>>>Kill if "references" matches the regular expression "<[^
>>>]*@nospam.cableone.net>"
>>>
>>>This will killfile every post Snit makes and also all replies to his posts,
>>>and this is how I set it up - this killed 146 messages from the group right
>>>away.
>>>
>>>You're welcome.
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, this message was wrapped in a negative way. The regular
>> expression should look like this:
>>
>> <[^ ]*@nospam.cableone.net>
>>
> I'm going to wait and see, since it was the weekend and all. I expect
> him to fully address the question we asked him and an apology PRN.
> Subsequent to this, I will expect an apology from Steve and Steeve and
> Ebot.

I have appologized.
http://tinyurl.com/33ypt
But I don't expect Snit to hold up his end of the deal. I will however
continue to now ignore Snit's trolling posts. This has gotten out of
hand.

Sandman

unread,
May 17, 2004, 1:00:43 PM5/17/04
to
In article <Bob_S-917B89....@newsclstr01.news.prodigy.com>,
Bob S <Bo...@NoSpam.Com> wrote:

> > I am, so I killfiled him. I strongly urge the Steves and Elizabot to do
> > the same. This is an efficient way to expunge -everything- related to Snit
> > from the group, using MT-Newswatcher:
>
> I hvae missed the whole Snit-Sandman/Steve thing. I don't know why it
> stayed below my radar. Guess I'll go back and Google the whole thing.

Google my "official sigmond faq" post, which will give you the gist of his
dishonesty, although not all of it - by a longshot.

> Only Mr. Elam and Pratt currently reside in my killfile folder, and I wind
> up reading their comments anayway because other posters quote them.

Adapt my filters for Tom and Pratt, and you will not have to read any followups
either.

--
Sandman[.net]

0 new messages